TreehuggerKyle's Replies


During the credits, they show the actual guys playing. You saw the ending, right? Morty did all that just to teach Michael a lesson, then he let Michael redo it all. Don't listen to 'isaacjamil'. A lot of people do it. :-) I don't think it was a dream. I think Morty was real, and all of that actually happened, and then Morty undid it all to give him a second chance. Have you seen it? He does a great job in it! I think they were confident that even if he could get their DNA again (since he worked with them), he wouldn't be able to get the one guy's son's DNA again. It only killed 3 people who were hated. Then it killed hundreds of thousands of haters. Someone in the episode stated it well, something like, "the hated were the bait, the haters are the real targets". So the OP's question could be asking "would you fall into either category", but I think it was asking "would you have voted/participated in the hashtag, and been killed during the final phase?" I suppose we could answer both since it's all hypothetical. I'm not popular enough on any platform to worry about becoming hated in a widespread fashion, so no to that. Although the third girl went viral for doing something dumb, and that could happen to anyone with a lapse in judgment. And I'm careful not to actually wish physical harm upon any public figure, no matter how much I hate them. I'm a bleeding heart, so I don't believe in the "eye for an eye" mentality. And even if I did hate someone to that extent, I'd never post it on social media, because I know there can be legal ramifications to that. I don't want to end up on some sort of watch list! TL;DR My answer is "no" :-) The IMDB trivia says the director has stated that there are Easter eggs (including one big one apparently) which explain why it's happening. So I was wondering if anybody caught it. His kids, and his inner circle, like him. But most people don't, including some close to him, like Melania and Putin. So I don't think he's very Homer-esque at all, because Homer, despite his personality, was liked by almost everyone. Actually the butler shows them both sides of the coin quite clearly before flipping it. If anything, atheists have the moral high ground over theists. When theists do the right thing, it's because they think they're being watched; they think they'll be rewarded for good things and punished for bad things. When atheists do the right thing, it's simply because it's the right thing to do. I don't know if in a court of law she'd be found guilty. Based on what they'd been through, if I were on the jury, I don't know if I'd convict her. She could make the defense that she was pretty sure that if she didn't shoot him, then Lucas would be given the same choice. Sure, the game *probably* would've ended with them both being alive, but she had no way of knowing. The people guilty of murder are the hosts and the staff, not the guests. The guests were hostages acting in self-defense. I think French is his native language, and the language he's most comfortable speaking, but he's still fluent in English. I don't know about the "Cadillac of twist endings". I was starting to think it might not be her. My guess was that it was either (a) his work buddy, who was sick of being in his shadow and wanted him out of the way, or (b) his friend's girlfriend, who thought he was a sleaze bag and wanted revenge on him on behalf of all scorned women, something like that. But the real culprit was better than either of those, I smacked my head for not guessing it! So I agree, great twist. Dude! I love it. Obviously Yuri knew there were people out there, and I figured (for a while) he wasn't really dead. That would've been a great ending. It would've been a much better fit for his character. I think the idea was that it had affected him too much mentally to go back physically, like they said, that he had gone "full walrus". But I was confused by that. It had only been a few days, right? So while I think that's supposed to be the answer, I had the same question as you. They could have removed the suit and that would've helped bring him back mentally. I thought it was a good ending. I agree it was sad, but that doesn't make it bad. It was a good twist. And it left me respecting the Mom much more. I thought it was selfish of her to have lied about who their father was; but we find out she was lying to protect them. How would you know it's not horror if you only watched the beginning? A lot of horror movies don't start off scary, they ease into the scariness. I think this was a sci-fi/horror mix. Not the scariest movie I've ever seen, but it is a horror movie. Solid ending? I thought the very ending was very disappointing. We find out that the cure is the main character's blood, for no reason. Teresa wants to use it to cure everyone. But when she dies, Thomas and the others - knowing that his blood is the cure - just leave? It's so against their nature to not want to help save everyone, now that they have the cure. That ruined the whole trilogy for me. Someone pointed out that the fact that there was so much blood in the bathtub after the birth scene might say that something about the birth was irregular, explaining why the baby wasn't crying. I'm no doctor, I have no idea how accurate that is. But they had to somehow explain why the baby wasn't crying while it was being born!