MovieChat Forums > beermonkey70 > Replies
beermonkey70's Replies
Guess I'm not the only one who saw the similarity..
https://twitter.com/nbcsnl/status/1335446396191772675?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1335446396191772675%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftvline.com%2F2020%2F12%2F05%2Fsnl-rudy-giuliani-crazy-blonde-witness-cecily-strong-video%2F
but ... but the voice-over said so and that's pretty conclusive. So that's that.
It's disturbing us how easily people are influenced by spooky voice overs
https://www.justice.gov/usao-mn/pr/self-described-member-boogaloo-bois-charged-riot
"deep state" lmao
I wonder if they think that their local PD's homicide division was created to commit murders
"Who made.them the adjudicators of truth? Who bestowed them with the right to censor a president?"
The 1st amendment
No, it was only a day, not 4 years.
Impeachment is not an attempt to overturn an election, that is not how an impeachment works
Its a joke. The narrator is basically trying to create a narrative out f thin air. Another nothing burger
No. It doesnt work like that
Fareed is wrong about what happens if neither candidate gets 270 electoral votes because a state doesn't send electors.
The constitution doesnt require 270 votes , it requires a "majority of appointed electors". The 270 number is based on 538 appointed electors. If , for example , PA doesnt appoint a slate of electors (they get 20) then only 260 electors are needed to win.
they were referring to Russia using social media to spread misinformation to influence voters not voter fraud.
If you were going to "rig" an election you do it by influencing voters with misinformation. That's very effective.
The idea that you can rig an national election with voter fraud is nonsense. To0 high-risk/low-reward to work n a national level.
This post screams "lives in moms basement"
You've never heard of Bill Burr?
its trailer park scientology
FDR over Hoover by 7 million
22.8 m to 15.7 m in total votes
This was 1932 , Hoover was president during the stock market crash of 1929 and ensuing great depression
Clinton beat Bush by 200 EVs and 5.5% in popular
FDR beat Hoover by 400 EVs and 18% in popular
it's 200 or 0.1% of the top two vote getters, whichever is smaller.. 200 would always be smaller unless the top 2 vote getters got less than 200k votes combined
let me know when one of those affidavits gets admitted into evidence into any case
never said being an eyewitness is hearsay. They aren't eyewitnesses
how many affidavits are there again? asked and answered
The number doesnt matter ..watch
0+0=0
and..
0+0+0=0
and ..
0+0+0+0+0+0=0
that works no matter how many zeroes you add
lol @ this moral victory
The segregated ballots only amount to ~10k and they were never counted. The lead is currently ~54k