Even CNN admits Trump can still win
Fareed Zakaria's take on how Trump could lose and still win.
https://youtu.be/ObuA1gROvWY
Fareed Zakaria's take on how Trump could lose and still win.
https://youtu.be/ObuA1gROvWY
This is exactly what SHOULD happen, but I don't think it will. It's undisputable that there have been irregularities, which is not the same as cheating, but they are there nonetheless. This is both a result of a calculated effort, and trying to implement the massive process of a mail-in ballot without the time to see it done properly. Regardless who wins, this election was not conducted 100% correctly. I doubt elections ever are, but I also doubt the percentage of incorrectly counted votes (for whatever reason they might be incorrect) has been anywhere near the rate of this election in the past 70 years.
shareTrump's way to win is exactly the same as Hillary's way to win in 2016. She could have taken it to the states to go around the electors. The establishment DNC and RNC never do it because it's an assault on democracy and creates a constitutional crisis.
That's why Trump is focusing so hard on this TV circus of trying to get people to agree there was fraud without providing evidence that he actually won.
If he butters up enough people, he can possibly steal the election from Biden by going to the states. If he doesn't butter up enough people, and the vast majority continues to believe Biden won, then Trump has to give up.
I love the clips where he goes to some podunk, supposedly RED stronghold and disparages the people who showed up.
"I shouldn't even have to be here. Oh well ...."
The guy is SO clueless, and people still eat it up like the popcorn and peanuts that have been swept up off the floor from the last rally.
He makes Hilary look like Shirley Temple and Joe like Fred Astaire, that is to say, eminently more likable.
That's two weeks old.
Trump is 1-39 in court.
The election is over and has been for a while.
Trump only claims fraud when he, or someone he supports, loses.
Only the rubes can't see through his clumsy, childish mendacity.
0 for 39
shareA minor win it should be noted
"Their one victory was shortening the cure deadline in PA for a small subset of rejected mail-in ballots from 9 days to 6 days. That is it."
https://twitter.com/marceelias/status/1329252472754368513
Wrong clip buddy, this is the one you should be linking:
https://youtu.be/aNZo_eakCgQ?t=349
Fuck Fox news, sista!
shareof course he can!
shareFareed is wrong about what happens if neither candidate gets 270 electoral votes because a state doesn't send electors.
The constitution doesnt require 270 votes , it requires a "majority of appointed electors". The 270 number is based on 538 appointed electors. If , for example , PA doesnt appoint a slate of electors (they get 20) then only 260 electors are needed to win.
Put a fork in it already.
shareListen, in California someone put out fake ballot drop off boxes.
They think it was the Republicans. Why isn't that fraud being investigated? This happened in several states, from what I understand.
Trump will be out of the White House next year.
share