beermonkey70's Replies


There won't be a recount in Arizona unless its within 200 votes. Yes.. 200 votes and a candidate cannot request one stop it before you hurt yourself. You throw around terms that you clearly dont understand Allow me to school you some more.. A sworn affidavit is a sworn statement in writing and signed by a witness. That's it. An affidavit being sworn does not mean it has been admitted. In fact it doesnt even mean it has been submitted to the court as evidence. The attorney would decide whether to attach the affidavit to the case. The judge then would decide if it can be admitted. The atty will often decide not to submit the affidavit if they know it wont be admissible so you are suggesting that a Supreme Court justice would make a ruling based on spite? but none that are admissible yet there is a nonzero number of affidavits here is what the judge said "This “supplemental evidence” is inadmissible as hearsay. The assertion that Connarn was informed by an unknown individual what “other hired poll workers at her table” had been told is inadmissible hearsay within hearsay, and plaintiffs have provided no hearsay exception for either level of hearsay that would warrant consideration of the evidence. " Yes I know what hearsay is. Obviously you don't It's when you didnt witness the wrongdoing yourself but were told about it from another party. The latter was the case . Hearsay is not admissible unless there a valid exception to the hearsay rule not a new account, First posted 8 months ago was also a poster on the old imdb boards Yes, I did read a lot of them and a number of the motion responses such as the Ostegren v Benson case in Michigan inadmissible hearsay is nothing. My statement ... "is going about as well" stands sounds nice until you actually read them. second hand hearsay with no direct evidence they called Florida for Gore at around 730 and retracted the call 2 hours later, before results came in from the west coast. Gore was never referred to as President-Elect The "mountain" is currently being laughed out of court Judge Diamond: Are your observers in the counting room? Trump lawyer: There's a non zero number of people in the room. Diamond: Are people representing Trump for president in that room? Lawyer: Yes. Diamond: I'm sorry, then what's your problem? Project Veritas... LOL . You might as well cite footage from the Blair Witch Project "So he out-performed Obama and only in these five states (Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, Arizona, and Nevada)." Verifiably false, not even close You mean .. its not rape rape