MovieChat Forums > beermonkey70 > Replies
beermonkey70's Replies
"What to do about receiving more ballots back than were sent out?"
that's just false. Someone made this claim based on the number of ballots sent out for the primary
what's next .. appeal to the Galactic Federation?
they would prefer to obey the will of the dear leader
opt a is the only way viable way to rig a national election
getting more votes == chicanery
"You are talking in a thread with the evidence in the OP, with a position of there is no evidence."
You think the video in the OP is "evidence"?????
How can anyone take anything you say seriously when you make such ignorant statements?
The video shows NOTHING
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/3e/a0/3e/3ea03e2ba19c1dcd5d5cff888501f442.gif
I'm not on your property , my sign is
Quit censoring me
also unless you seeing a saucer was a material fact in actual court proceeding then there is no perjury even if you admit to lying about it
This whole "they go to prison if they are lying" posturing is nonsense. Nobody is risking prison here
Perjury only exists if a statement under oath (such as an affidavit) so support a matter that is material to an actual court proceeding
The second part is what you guys aren't getting. These affidavits are NOT subject to perjury if they are lying simply because they are not being used in any case. They were only collected for SHOW.
you are violating my first amendment rights
I'm going to make a sign that says "Trump is a Pedophile" and post it in your front yard.
Are you going to leave it up or will you censor me?
If you were more informed you would already know.
The report was an investigation of Russian interference in the election
Do you seriously not know what the Russian interference entailed? It wasn't voter fraud. It had nothing to do with the voting process itself. That's not how you rig a national election.
clearly you do a lot of meth. What's that like? .. just out of curiosity
I take your inability to respond as a concession of the point. So we agree there is no evidence
"signed affadavits" .. doesnt mean you think it means
No one was claiming voter fraud in 2016
what level of bitterness is the inability to admit you lost?
there is objectively NO evidence.
Most of these affidavits were NOT submitted into evidence. So , by definition they are NOT evidence. Ones that were submitted were rejected as hearsay.
SCOTUS says otherwise, unanimously