MovieChat Forums > Ticketsplease > Replies
Ticketsplease's Replies
I don't consider Bond to be a British film as it takes place all around the world with a diverse cast.
I'm 20.
Definitely an amazing creation. Their flexibility, speed, climbing ability, jumping ability, etc. The Egyptians thought they were divine or a representation of the divine.
Tyson was a terrible friend I take it.
I know of him but not a fan. Tax cheat.
They're hard to get into is all.
People don't have the vocabulary to discuss music.
And if anyone did look like Richie Valens the movie wouldnt have appeal. Lou Diamond has movie star looks, Richie Valens did not.
Patent courts would disagree.
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/04/how-the-aussie-government-invented-wifi-and-sued-its-way-to-430-million/
Maybe because they don't want to look at the field in between plays and our news feeds can be exciting places?
Some I suppose, didn't they invent wifi?
Playing music is actually like learning to read. I once asked how professional string players can play a piece at first site, they said it's just like reading a book and you're told at what speed to read it.
Of course, it's an amazing ability but apparently most could learn this with enough practice.
Yes I am not afraid to say the obvious, those three groups invented basically everything.
Chinese don't invent, they copy.
Japanese don't invent, they engineer, they refine. Look at all the "japanese technology" we use, they're all refinements of inventions white people made. TVs, music players, cameras, etc. They've made huge gains and I acknowledge that, but none of these things were invented by them.
Even their celebrated Walkman was found to infringe upon a white man's invention and they eventually lost in court.
Asians aren't smart. Specific asian cultures (Chinese and Japanese) put a strong emphasis on good grades. So they're not lazy. They do what we all could do if we applied ourselves.
The smartest people are actually white Americans and White British, followed by Italians. I say this purely on their inventiveness and creativity.
They created the modern technological world.
We live in 2022. We interact with things using our phones. So as long as it is an actual interaction with the movie you shouldn't scorn it.
True man, I have a very limited attention span. I don't enjoy exploration of characters if it's self serving or just a monologue for some actor to show us his chomps.
Your beliefs are weird.
Good looks are shown to be a huge advantage in life. People instinctively trust good looking people.
I saw a hidden camera test where a very handsome man approached kids in the park and played with them and the mothers were fine with it.
It's crazy how much leeway good looking people get in life.
Women get out of tickets from cops if they're sexy and flirty.
So to answer your question, I'd say it's the opposite, good looks makes people more tolerable.
I didn't say those of child bearing age should have sex.
And child bearing age is also old enough physically and mentally to have a child. Agreed?
https://youtu.be/BHeZS3mGDKY
Sorry to burst your bubble. He was a bad man.