MovieChat Forums > Palanador21 > Replies
Palanador21's Replies
You're whining precisely because you don't like seeing a female hero.
You have a problem with accurate portrayals of history
You don't like the fact that this is one of the few times where white men are made to look bad in a movie with a none white lead.
First of all you fucking nimrod I said that through the eyes of Native Americans in 1719 there were very few "good white men".. I even brought a few historical facts to showcase that point.. That is why through the eyes of Native Americans they would be seen as evil. This movie is a period piece told through the eyes of natives(Naru in particular).. Your argument that Hollywood does nothing but make white men look evil today also holds no salt since white men are the heroes in 95% of all movies made in Hollywood. Look at this trailer for upcoming movies:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0VwoYslTFv4
Most all of the heroes are white except for the aliens who are voiced primarily by white people.. Like I said, your problem is with the accurate portrayal of history within this film.
2. I said that she was never FORBID from hunting. Sure her mother wanted her to give up hunting and focus on her many other skills in order to help the tribe. But nobody ever FORBID her from hunting. Her brother even gave her a chance when they went after the lion and she failed.. So though some might have suggested that she not hunt. It was never forbidden as I stated. Now here is your point that is just freaking braindead. People use the fact that someone says they can't do something as motivation to go out and get it done all of the damn time. Five, foot four inch Spud Webb used the fact that people said he had no business being in the Slam Dunk Contest to go out and win the damn thing. That is just called proving the haters wrong. There isn't a damn thing woke about that.
And it has nothing to do with caring about what others think. It's about knowing what you are capable of and going out and achieving it no matter what others think. So would it have been competent and virtuous to just bow her head and go do the woman's work like everyone was telling her to do including her own mother?
Again. There is nothing woke about this movie.
What you are doing is whining..
If you are trying to be sarcastic.. It should be obvious that the star of the movie is going to beat the predator. That's not giving anything away. Saying exactly how she did would be spoiling the ending; don't you think?
That was really good.. It's based off of a story in this audiobook.. It also has a bunch of other pretty good tales... Check it out:
Predator: If it Bleeds
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QCrAi-GJSoM
No, because that gives away the end of the movie.. Watch it..
1. This movie took place in 1719 around the time when white men were doing things like giving Native Americans diseased blankets, slaughtering whole tribes and taking slaves on a regular basis. Through the eyes of the natives there were very few good white men at that time. There was nothing "woke" about that it was just a fact of history. Your problem is with the accurate portrayal of history, not this movie.
2. I also wouldn't say that their society was necessarily bigoted.. The women had a very important role to play in their tribe as doctors, cooks and care givers.. These are very important roles. They just weren't typically huntse the men didn't think that they were built for it. It would kind of be like saying American society is bigoted because we don't think that women should be playing football,, They did have respect for her skills as a tracker and nobody necessarily forbid her from hunting. At no time did I feel compelled to root for the other tribesmen's deaths.. They never treated her that bad. Also none of the male warriors were necessarily weak. In fact they were quite fearless when it came to fighting the Predator.
They got killed because they didn't have time to form a plan. Her brother in particular was a very good warrior.
It really just seems to me that you don't like seeing female leads in these types of movies..
I just see the people who are always calling everything woke as being unintelligent and having very little imagination. There is no way to tell a great story without having some sort of messaging in it.. The message in this movie was for the young woman to always believe in herself and never give up.. Now how in the hell can someone have a problem with that?
Watson was never charged with or even accused of rape, so what in the hell are you even talking about Joogle83..
First off calm down.. I respect women as well.. I also respect the rule of law and the law spoke and stated that Watson had done nothing wrong.. In fact it was a women(likely a feminist) who looked over the evidence; lack thereof and gave him the six game suspension. Do you know more about this case than she does?
Being a creep is not a crime and considering he was never found guilty of anything one could say that the six games were too harsh. It was more to appease feminists than anything.
Black is only a derogatory term to insecure white incels who feel threatened whenever Black superheroes or righteous characters are portrayed on screen.. See any Star Wars thread which stars a Black actor..
What exactly do you have against learning about other cultures?
I also liked learning about that.. I had no knowledge of The Partition at all before this show..
Fool I have I saw the video and know exactly what happened just like the rest of the world.. The only one swallowing a bullshit narrative is you.. But hey if it makes you feel better you can alwayse write Chauvin some love letters..
Ah Floyd didn't OD on any drugs that day...he was murdered. That is why the swine is doing 20 years hard time.
Let's see them put the ex-cop in general population and we will see who has the death sentence.
They can get rid of her by simply by kicking her out of the country and making certain that she never returns.. The fact that they are trying to get back an international terrorist who tried to murder Americans shows me that Griner is just a pawn. The fact that you don't seem to care about a man like this potentially being turned over to the Russians.. And think that it's more important that this American citizens suffers for years in a Russian prison for something that is as small as less than an once of weed even if she did do it, says an awful lot about you...none of it being good.
No she couldn't deny it in the letter that she sent to Biden if the Russian authorities read the letter before it was even sent to Biden, now could she? Any denial of her "crime" and the letter isn't sent. Griner had been playing ball in Russia since 2014, she knew the law; why would she try to break it now? If this were truly about some sort of Russian law why are they willing to trade her for an international criminal? Again, some of you people really need to think..
Ninety percent of the people charged with a crime in Russia get convicted. This in and of itself speaks to just how corrupt the countries "justice" system is.. She plead guilty because she was forced to plead guilty. She is in Russia. Putin is using the woman to get back some terrorist that we are holding in this country. So of course his people can manipulate Britney Griner into saying anything.. Any justice system that was actually concerned with justice wouldn't be trying to trade "criminals" for other people. The woman is a pawn in this game. The problem with people like you is that you refuse to think.
Griner is obviously a political prisoner.. I doubt she even did what the Russians say she did. Putin is just using her to try and get one of his pathetic cronies back.