MovieChat Forums > TheCatman > Replies
TheCatman's Replies
It has nothing to do with Rogan.
It's the people who think they are Liberals, but aren't. They will attack anyone, without knowing anything about them, if they support anyone the media says isn't Liberal.
You could serve ice cream to a Republican and they they would want to burn down your shop because you're now a Nazi.
He played an intelligent but deranged criminal, who was in love with his sister, on a TV show called Wiseguy and he was great. Since then I have been a big fan.
I was kind of shocked to find out he was gay, but it wasn't a big deal to me, since that's the norm for Hollywood. I also wasn't shocked that he was accused of bothering young guys because I'm sure that's nonstop in Hollywood. Rock Hudson used have his butler go out and find young heteros to get drunk and rape like 70 years ago, so hitting on guys now is not amazing.
I assumed someone set him out.
Whatever the case, I would like to see him back in shows.
Objectively, he doesn't.
If you look at drawings of Superman this guy doesn't look much like him.
However, the recent TV show about Superman had an actor who doesn't look like Superman and he did a great job because his acting was very much like the character should be, so there's that.
When Holmes was written cocaine was legal.
If you have modern versions of the story with Holmes using coke, it's supporting sociopathic and criminal behavior, which Holmes would not engage in.
Also, Holmes wasn't addicted to cocaine. He was addicted to solving crimes.
When he didn't have crimes to solve he got depressed. So, he would use a "7% solution" of cocaine to get artificially excited.
Also, cocaine was a much different product when Doyle was writing than it is today.
All of that is true.
There are about 14 million jews in the world, many are going to be children, so even a smaller percentage of 14 million is in charge of a majority of very important industries.
That's because judaism is a mafia organization, not a religion.
All religions are a type of "hate group" as they segregate people based on fantasy beliefs.
With all of that being said, Superman, one of my favorite characters, was invented by two probably very positive people who were technically jewish.
At the time, Neitzche was popular with Nazis. His idea was that a real man is ruthless and does what he wants when he wants and will make people go along with him. It wasn't for negative purposes but Nazis liked the ideas because they wanted to force their society into change, but their ideas were not positive.
Meanwhile, jews have communist ideas about people cooperating. So, a real man is a "man of the people" and uses his "powers" to help everyone, selflessly. As a result, he is loved and gets help from the people.
Also, the guys who invented Superman were trying to say something about immigrants and being another "species" compared to everyone else. Supremacist jews think they are superior to others and even that their "souls" weigh more than infidels. However, Superman is about not caring that you are different and superior and just trying to be a normal human.
So, the Superman authors were probably ethnically jewish but were trying to bring positive jewish ideas and humanistic ones into popular culture. I am tired of jews running things through nepotism and jewish people dominating the media, but a jew playing Superman is not horrible as I love Superman and he's a positive American-jewish creation.
However, I don't think the actor looks enough like Superman to sell the character, but we will see.
That's not true.
I listen to the show occasionally and it's a mixed bag.
Mike Rowe was on recently and talked about how he was once and opera singer and didn't know Italian. So, there's stuff like that then there's political material, stuff about aliens, drugs, comedians, and so on.
I'm been working out for decades and Rogan's show is like the kind of stuff you talk about at the gym with dudes. It's also like internet forum convos.
It's not just about one thing.
On YouTube, there's a show called Report of the Week.
A young guy who reminds me of Johnny Twenties, the main character of this film, reviews fast food.
The host tends to wear retro clothing and speaks in the clipped tones of a 1930s, 40s reporter.
I have no idea if there's a connection between him and this movie but it's all fun if you like the concept.
The father dying is bizarre.
However, I have been a comics fan my whole life and when I read them as kid they were very dramatic. That's why we have the films we do today. They were epic stories.
Everything doesn't work out for superheroes and so stories are reflective of life.
There's a lot of Japanese stories like that about heroes. When, you put yourself out there you invite danger and tragedy. So, Superman destroying the city to fight people he attracted is a good message.
Your comment is moronic.
Hitler lived in a country with a court system as did most kings.
Use your brain.
People in the US aren't taking CEOs to Chinese court but rather they would be taking them to American courts.
Trying doing some thinking.
It doesn't matter.
People fighting Hitler didn't have to have Hitler do anything to them to fight him.
What about taking a king or Hitler to court?
They control the courts and it will do nothing.
In the US "business" is seen as being good and up to the decision of the business owner. Also, if you don't like that business, go to another one, is the common phrase.
Online businesses can use censorship, because it's up to the owner, but we hate censorship, but it's okay because it's a business.
This kind of no win situation will get people murdered and court will not help because court is part of the oppressive culture.
I'm not for it but know why they do it.
Sun Tzu was an ancient Chinese General who wrote the book, The Art of War.
He believed that fighting physically was a waste. That's because people die, you waste resources and so on. He believed that the best kind of "fighting" was with spies, bribery, diplomacy, culture, and so on. That way you take over your enemy and they don't even know you're doing it.
So, foreign aid is like taking over a country without fighting it.
Country X gets 10 billion from us and they barely make much money. So, the leaders "steal" that money and live like kings. Then, when the US wants something from them they better comply or else they lose their paychecks.
So, the US is now in control of that country.
Foreign aid is "Bribery" done for positive or negative reasons depending on who is in charge of the US.
Correct.
Read my new one below.
I am.
I'm not a violent person and don't want anyone to be harmed.
I used to work in prison psychology with serial killers and whatnot and didn't want to see them killed.
However, if someone tried to directly hurt and kept trying they would be in for some violence.
I'm sure you would be okay with hearing that someone tried to kill me and I killed them.
Hitler said that killing one person is a tragedy while killing many people is a statistic.
Royalty used ideas about genetics mixed with magic to oppress and kill people. Politicians used political philosophy and now CEO use the idea that "business" and "profit" are legit reasons to oppress and kill people. So, they are the latest people doing the same thing as always and do deserve to be scared or die.
They are attacking people and what happens when you do that you will get the historical logical response.
No.
They are science fiction adventures.
I'm in my late 50s and when I was a kid they were more exciting and dramatic than anything on TV or movies.
Stan Lee made a lot of comics to teach mental health ideas and so the stories weren't silly, they were interesting and dramatic.
The progression is king royaly, kill politicians, kill CEOs.
CEOs are the new royalty because they are untoubable due to the belief that "business" is a right.
Royalty was a right, and that fell out of public belief, a leader elected was seen as a right, and now that is not believes, and now we have businessmen have a right because they are in charge of a business.
So, the new progression is to kill them because they have no right.
That's a lead in to communism.
Now Silver Surfer is a woman who wears a suit.
It's insane and I will not watch.
That is likely true in real life.
However, the movie is based on an Austrian book and TV movie.
There's nothing mysterious about it.
Yes, but they have made deals before.
So, it would have been wise to share profits vs making a bomb and further disappointing people.
The upcoming Fantastic Four movies looks heinous AGAIN and all of these people are idiots.