MovieChat Forums > TheCatman
TheCatman (282)
Posts
Did George Lucas Write This?
Dumb Opening Premise.
Dumb Opening Premise.
The Cat Story is Somewhat True.
View all posts >
Replies
Then Batman would be a serial killer in a costume and Superman would be an alien monster.
When comic movies ignore source material they are doomed.
Superman was played well.
Batman was horrible via Afflect and the director.
Batman is a dead serious calculating Sherlock Holmes Ninja. Also, he doesn't murder people. But, in the movie he was jokey, murdered people, and didn't have the demeanor of the animated/comic character.
Lex Luthor is a cold and jealous super genius, not goofy and insane. The actor played Luthor like Joker, which was just bizarre.
Flash is another genius who is a super fast thinker and witty. The actor played him like an awkward Woody Allen type, which makes no sense.
Doomsday is a creation from Krypton not a medical experiment done on General Zod. So, what fans expected from Doomsday was ignored and replaced with a story no one loved.
Epic stories exist about Darkseid, who predates Thanos, and so the goal would be to immediately lead in with his character as the villain. One good story I recall was that Darkseid was flooding Earth with advanced weapons to undermine there Earth, but whatever.
Darkseid and his planet were discussed much in the film but the main characters encounter the technology from the planet like "motherboxes" and what average person knows what that is?
So, we had a film with MANY violations of known character AND it was decided to gloss over what Darkseid and his world was but feature a side character of Darkseid as the main villain. I'm a huge comic fan, of older ones, and had no clue who the villain with the horns was and still forget his name.
So, the movie was another case of a director making up their own version of characters that are nearly a hundred years old and that people love. It's like a cook at McDonalds deciding to make goat burgers because he thinks people will like them.
They lost the chance to make epic movies. Meanwhile, the animated DC films are epic and respect the source material, which I find extremely bizarre.
I'm waiting for the new films to be "funny" ruining it more
I explained this already.
You have no education about drugs and didn't think of the dangerous drugs I did, so you are not informed about the topic but are just reacting.
My original question was if you knew why Kennedy held that position and it turns out you don't and are just reacting to the way a sentence sounds.
I'll bet they have an age range though.
Correction: I researched it and a 16 year old can have sex with a person of any age.
That seems too young to me.
This is moronic.
The rioters were burning down cities, murdering, and assaulting people. That's why he went there with a gun.
Meanwhile, the people he shot were criminals themselves, so we can assume that they weren't trying to have a sociopolitical conversation with him.
Not if many drugs have negative side effects.
They aren't "drugs" in that case.
Like many people, you are reacting to words you don't understand.
Many films seem to be made by people with no life experience or education.
There was a fairly good TV series called Banshee. It took place in PA where I grew up.
The show was supposed to be near Danville, PA which is a rural area. The story centered around an Amish mafia, there's no Amish in that area, and a Native American reservation and there's none in PA.
Also, the main character robs the Museum in Harrisburg PA and it looks like a NYC museum with fine paintings. In reality, the museum is tiny and dedicated to PA history, not paintings.
It was as if it took place in an alternate universe.
In reality, the writers probably did zero research and just heard about things in PA. I find that pathetic.
Yes, back then I recall thinking that you could not get a relationship with a girl your own age.
Boys were like "kids" to pretty girls who were the same age.
As you've said, that's jail material now.
In my state, you can be four years older than someone under 18 and get away with it.
You need to learn to explain yourself as do many on here.
You can say something is great or horrible without an explanation.
Anyway, I will watch anything with Arnold but the theme of the film was dumb.
If I died and there was a clone ready to roll out to keep a version of me alive I'd be greatly appreciative.
The goal was to be lame and disturbing rather than overtly funny.
So, his goal was to annoy and disturb the audience. If you get it then you will laugh at his attempt to be purposely annoying.
His comedy was passive-aggressive.
It was unique but not genius.
A genius comedian would be funny in some way know one had thought of before.
View all replies >