This is quite difficult to imagine ha?Maybe Johnny Depp? or Tom Cruise?...or Will Smith with Morgan Freeman as his father?Pitt's performance is out of this World one of his best if not the best he deserved the Oscar that year
The rest are actual real actors. Not too sure Pitt playing a goofball outclasses any of them - Cromwell as the pig farmer in Babe included...
reply share
That's very interesting, they were all extremely memorable roles. Rob Roy is a criminally under-rated movie, much better than the other Scottish period piece that won best picture. Like any movie about a hero, it's usually the quality of the villian that can make it truly great, and Roth did just that.
Pitt was great. Maybe others could have done it as well, but none better. Maybe crazy has been done as well, but when it is, it gets nominations and wins awards.
Ed Harris was solid as usual, but i think a lot of actors could have done as well. Cromwell appeal was that he totally underplayed his part to perfection. It was charming but isn't the type of performance that will win many awards.
Spacey - it was very unusual (no pun intended). His parts in flashbacks was so-so, but what got him the award was the scene where he's just sitting and talking. I think the script won that award more than the acting performance.
Playing insane isn't that hard. Jim Carrey would have been just as easy but a Brit actor like Michael Sheen or Gary Oldman could have done just as well. Pitt's overrated performance was just that; Overrated, just like his "Mickey" schtick in "Snatch"
Yeah, but I was talking specifically about Pitt's performance in 12M's. I actually think Pitt's a solid actor and in roles like Early from "Kalifornia" he was far more visceral but that performance went unrecognized for the most part.