Would you put this among Hitchcocks best?
I personally would. It is one of his most ambitious films. The characters are 3 dimensional, the script is cracking and the story is so Hitchcockian. My 3rd or 4th favorite of his.
Cheers
I personally would. It is one of his most ambitious films. The characters are 3 dimensional, the script is cracking and the story is so Hitchcockian. My 3rd or 4th favorite of his.
Cheers
[deleted]
Wait, wait. Rope lacked SUSPENSE?
Sorry, but what were you smoking when you watched this movie? The ENTIRE plot revolves around a dinner party eating around a chest containing a dead man's corpse, all in one continuous take. It's probably the most suspenseful premise in cinematic history.
Would you put this among Hitchcocks best?
[deleted]
[deleted]
I agree with Buddy Love. I am bewildered by the very high praise bestowed upon this movie on IMDb. Hitchcock is one of the greatest of all time, no doubt, but he had a bit of stinkers, and this is one of them, though it may be the most interesting one. The long take technique was at first a bit interesting, then became awkward and dull. James Stewart was miscast, although Dall and Granger were good. There are a few great moments, but it is mostly awkward. Many Hitchcocks better than this!
My 100 Favorite Movies: http://www.imdb.com/list/LY8qyzdq3-I/
[deleted]
Yes! I would also add "Frenzy" and "Shadow of a Doubt".
shareI definitely put this in his upper tier mainly for the same reasons you've just listed, a wonderful film...
shareNo.
Born when she kissed me, died when she left me, lived whilst she loved me