MovieChat Forums > jimmyjuliano > Replies
jimmyjuliano's Replies
i was talking about doogiedaday, genius
he'll win in 2020, and for the next 5 years you'll be telling us every 2 weeks "but they're going to impeach him this time! really!" hahahahaha!!
when will you loons learn that you can't impeach a president just because you don't like him?
thats what you told us 3 years ago, when the left wing media manipulated you hahahahahaha i'd pay 3 grand to have a life stream of your face on election night.
and you were rolling on the floor at the sci-fi film reference?
star wars! hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha! try and live in real world, you beta! where your feelings don't matter so much.
more fascist speech censorship from the "liberals" all in the name of pretending to be offended. aren't you supposed to say "personal point of priviledge" before having an opinion? surely thats a hate crime too..
you see trump when you close your eyes don't you?! you need to write "t-rump" like that because you've broke your keyboard typing his name so much?
you're obssesed, and i like it
that episode was a little deeper and more complex than that, rememeber that sometimes these things, like kevin treating his father badly is just a way of driving the episode towards something.
you mention a great episode, kevin really starts to worship the basketball player, the guy is a hero, then he loses a game and kevin loses faith in him, thats what klds think like! they don't understand that tomorrow is another day, that one loss isn't the end of the world. they can't understand the complexity of these things, maybe this basketball player went on the be an NBA star....
this episiode allows kevin to learn something, he worships the basketball player then loses faith based on one loss. but over supper with his father, he sees the bigger picture, he sees in jack a hero, a hero that puts food on the table, that has raised a beautful family, and is a hero every single day. he sees the bigger picture.
and believe me! you did something that dumb! so did i!
no thanks, i'm not really into putting a wig on and calling myself erica. maybe you are...
who do i think he married? or should he have married?
when older kevin narrates what happen, he's exactly that, he's older, i don't know how old you are, but would you still be attracted to the same girl you liked when you was 16? kevin grew, he married and had kids with someone i would assume was better than all these girls.
i adore this show because it tells us something about childhood and life, kevin started off being best friends with paul, they were inseperable, as the show nears it's end he's closer to his other friends, the twists and turns of life, changing schools, whatever... took their natural toll on the relationship, the same thing happened to me, with my two best friends, we'll be friends forever, like kevin and paul, but it's different...
and it's the same with winnie, at some point in his life, paul thought he grown old with her, and maybe he thought it about another girl, haven't we all?! kevin arnold like all of us is a complicated person, who changes his mind and what he wants, he didn't end up with winnie, although that seemed the perfect ending, but life isn't like that. but thats ok...
as for your question, older kevin didn't marry one of those girls, he married some beautiful girl who he met one night totally at random, her name is unimportant.
i'll never understand why people come to these boards complaining about these things, the show is very very realistic, we can identify with it, because 75% of what happens in the show happened to us. the show tells the story of a kid growing up, thru puberty, love, loss, hope, expectations, failure, win, loss... whatever...
Kevin was a kid, kids don't know how to handle relationships like adults do, their brains aren't as developed, did kevin know how to react when pauls dad was doing better than jack? no! because he's a kid, so he gets jealous and reacts in ways he shouldn't.
thats what the show was about, the awkwardness of growing up, learning from your mistakes. if you expect every single character on shows to be nice guys and perfect in everyway then i dont know what to tell you! you must be very young too!
i've said that in GENERAL, libs want this story to go away, they aren't reporting on it, your friend steve is getting all agressive, calling people "loony" anderson cooper too. but am i so radical like you that i believe that every single liberal journalist is pushing an agenda? no, i'm not that radical like you. i'm not as brainwashed as you, to hate people, not to see there are different degrees of these things.
i believe that generally the left wants this to go away, i'm just not brainwashed enough to believe that the whole of the left is supporting pedophiles. try and understand that, try and be less extreme. or you're one step away from shooting up a school....
so you're saying that every liberal reporter is a biased nutjob like you? and i can't cite someone from a liberal paper?
i could do that with anyone and with anything, i saw AOC in new york, near this correctional facility 2 minutes before epstein died, and my friend works at a apple store that fixed her laptop and there was "how to make a murder look like a suicide" on her search history...
you see? the democrat strategy with trump has been "throw enough shit and something will stick" you can see videos from protect veritas, of people, important people at CNN saying "we know the whole russian thing is BS, but anything we can do to undermine him...."
and thats all it is, thats the new democratic strategy, "yeah yeah i know it doesn't look good for clinton, but trump, but trump, but trump, but trump...."
we have to decide if we want truth or political bias.
come back with something inteligent instead of childish "loopholes" to discredit something. it's boring
it's a shame sarcasm doesn't get people off child rape charges, you'd make a good lawyer.....
trumps name isn't coming out, and i know you'd love it to come out, but there aren't pilots talking about seeing him on the plane.
i'll put it like this, the clintons are the democrat party, if they are running in this election or not, so lets see, we're 14 months off an election, to get rid of maybe the most hated president (for the democrats) in american history, the clintons like i say are the democrat party, bill was president, and hillary has been a major player and the nomination for the last 12 years ok? so lets say this went to trial and we had 14 months of "clinton was seen here, this girl says this, this girls says that, we have a pilot that says.. clinton clinton, clinton clinton clinton, clinton clinton clinton clinton"
it affects the democrat brand, forget the clintons, it affects the democrat brand as we near an election year, so thats my point!
and linking trump into this, because he was in a picture with him 25 years ago?! is like linking my grandmother with the kennedy assination, because she had her picture took with bobby kennedy in a beach in hyannis during the 50s. it's politics, and not truth. and believe me if it does come out that trump is linked? hang him. straight up, i'd be the first to call for his impeachment, jail too, but you know what? naaaa i don't see it, and deep down you don't either
sam you'e trying to win petty arguments to deflect from the big picture. and it's telling, very telling, i'd never be that stupid enough to say "EVERYBODY on the left is trying to hide this" that would be ignorant. i believe that in general the left wants this to go away, it's another pizzagate for them, it's a loony conspiracy, when we know it isn't, so yeah, most liberals do, but is every single liberal newspaper journalist like that? no, of course not.
but well done, if you've ignored the most important part of it all to try and win some petty little argument. well done. but like i say, i'm very worried about the lefts link with pedophilia, maybe they aren't ALL actual pedophiles, but this delection that leads to innocent children being abused is all part of the same hypocracy.
we don't know what epstein could have said, and i'm not just talking about the clintons, this could be anything and everything. we don't know how this would have played out, taking it to trial, names coming out.....we're 14 months off an election. to have another 14 months of this, of names coming out well maybe it would affect certain people, certain naratives....
it goes deeper than the clintons, who would have knew matt groenings name would have come out? i think that no epstein means no trial, no trial and certain things get put to bed, yeah they have got the 2000 page court documentary, but with something like this, theres always a dominio affect, like the me-to movement, weinstein.... anything like that, it starts snowballing. but no trial, and this just all may be put to bed by the end of the month. get what i'm saying?