MovieChat Forums > agentalbert > Replies
agentalbert's Replies
Definitely. Levy is smoking.
Some prudes find anything with sex to be "soft porn". There was nothing remotely porn about this movie.
She flat out tells him that she isn't his mother anymore. What she is now isn't the woman who gave birth. Now whether she was really trying to seduce him, or just trying to get him off guard to get the advantage is up for debate. But I thought it (and Sanaa) was pretty hot.
Update: Reply from Shout indicated the run time on their DVD is 81 minutes, 32 seconds. So probably the same as your Italian DVD. They also provided the below review link which is about the version they sell:
https://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/54278/roger-cormans-cult-classics-lethal-ladies-collection-vol-2/
Ooh, the scary sex and girl boobies! Watch out!
Don't be such a prude...
She is spectacular. For being slim, she has really great breasts. She's very sexy.
The full 108 minute uncut version streams on Amazon Prime right now. Lots of nice Sylvia Kristel eye-candy!
I agree. She looked absolutely milf-a-licious! With there were some good pictures of her from this movie.
Really disappointing that Amazon has the short (88 minute edited cut) of this. This is way too common with movies on Amazon, where they have edited versions with no warning. Anyone who would appreciate a movie like this wants it intact.
Thanks. I wrote Shout Factory to see if they could provide the runtime for their version on that DVD. Maybe the 90 minutes listed at IMDB is wrong.
What I would like to know (and the review doesn't mention) is whether the DVD has the full length version of "The Arena". It's listed with a runtime of 90 minutes at IMDB. There is a version streaming on Amazon, but it runs only 80 minutes, and seems like one of those typical choppily edited US versions.
Definitely Alma Garrett.
They should have gone with Bridget The Midget.
He's a white male, which tells you pretty much all you need to know these days when it comes to gleaning whether a character is a villain or not.
[quote] Will be 7.0 soon: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt7713068/ratings?ref_=tt_ov_rt [/quote]
That's really super awesome that it will be a 7.0 soon! What an accomplishment!
Who gives a rats ass? I don't get why people follow IMDB ratings and Rotten Tomato %'s as if they are sports scores.
Original post is complete b.s. However, if Helen Mirren wants to get nude for a sex scene (even in her 70's), I'll watch. She's still sexy to me.
Sadly, there is nothing remotely approaching that in this movie.
LOL at the article calling this "surprisingly feminist". How is that surprising at all? The reversed title clues you in to that, and a feminist take/feminist version of anything is completely rote now.
Because putting a hashtag in a movie title is retarded. It's be a good way to prevent anyone over 25 from going to see it, though. Not that too many went to see it anyway. I didn't either.
I expect actors not to take parts they aren't willing to do. A stunt double for safety is one thing. But a body double just because you don't want to show skin? No. Then don't take the role.
From the Kurt Loder review:
"...some of the women actually strip, but the leads don't."
https://reason.com/2019/09/13/review-hustlers/