MovieChat Forums > eYeDEF > Replies
eYeDEF's Replies
I asked you the other day what you thought he lied about because you appeared so upset and you couldn't tell me.
The only thing I saw was when he admitted to misspeaking about Netanyahu's indictment which I frankly found ridiculous for you to insist he lied when he admitted his mistake. Everyone knows a sitting PM can't go to trial while in office so it was obvious he wasn't trying to lie about Bibi being found guilty when logic dictates that can't happen while he is still the Prime Minister.
But like I said, none of it matters because you clearly don't care about lies or hypocrisy so long as the person adheres with you politically. That's why you constantly accusing doggiedaddy of lying when the president you support is such a MASSIVE and proven liar is a joke.
You know what's really weird? How you keep following doggiedaddy around and accusing him of lying when the president you support is the biggest established and proven liar of all.
It kind of takes the wind out your sails by proving you really don't care if someone lies as long as you agree with them politically. It exposes you as a massive hypocrite while making your accusations sound like a bad joke.
He's an admitted sexually repressed christo-fascist. The only way he can get himself off is by luridly fantasizing about other people's sex life.
You should have saw him in this other thread where he was going off describing how he imagined Clinton told women to "suck it". You can tell just how repressed he is by how much he gets his rocks off talking about it.
The kid should get a job so he can afford to buy himself a hooker. Too bad Jesus told him not to.
It really is bizarre. It really had me questioning whether the two here saying it can't be done while citing "science" are in fact dyslexic.
lulz ... well yeah it's his TV channel. He orders who he doesn't want to see on and his blowhards heil their führer and obey.
Interesting AP reported this yesterday:
<blockquote>The Trump administration has quietly released more than $100 million in military assistance to Lebanon after months of unexplained delay that led some lawmakers to compare it to the aid for Ukraine at the center of the impeachment inquiry.</blockquote>
No coincidence this happens just when Senator Chris Murphy alerted the public how aid was being withheld.
Best guess is this was being done at the behest of the Saudis. MBS has been at loggerheads with Lebanon for awhile.
The Blaze is Glenn Beck's fake news.
Let's not kid around. Trump really didn't give two shits about the quest of the protesters when he was ready to sacrifice them at the altar of a trade deal.
It's just that bipartisan pressure in the form of veto proof legislation made that trade-off no longer possible.
https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-china-promise-hong-kong-silence-trade-progress-cnn-2019-10
Not really seeing as how his interest is in getting a trade deal. This law isn't going to help him get one.
"I don't think there's one shred of proof Epstein ever made a single transaction on Wall Street"
In the early eighties when he became a limited partner at Bear Stems before getting canned for a reg D violation three probably is.
But you're right that since he struck it out on his own there is no evidence he was involved in any transactions.
LolZ! That would be THE scandal.
Has it made its way out of committee yet? Last I remember it was being stalled by his stooges in the Committee on Foreign Relations and prevented from a floor vote.
What about 28 years later?
That could be less contrived and more interesting.
When it's Kremlin interests and Russian oligarchs trying to cover its tracks of funneling dirty money to the President of the United States (Deutche Bank has shady history acting as front for Russian money laundering) anything is possible.
What lies?
You're the hypocrite here.
That's going to be hard when just from what we know now Rudy was a central figure but hardly the only guy on Trump's orders pushing for manufactured dirt on Biden. Rudy, Toensing, DiGenova, Parnas and Fruman were involved in the larger criminal conspiracy to secure illegal in kind campaign donations (in the form of Biden dirt) for Trump. These other side deals are a part of that conspiracy as none of them would have standing to push these deals but for their representation of Trump’s interest and awareness that each of these players was also demanding help for Trump as part of their entreaties. That’s the thrust of the flood of articles we're seeing now on Firtash, Ihor Kolomoisky, and Lutsenko.
As Jed Shugerman wrote, the issue is ‘felony coordination’.
<blockquote>
Obvious campaign felony by @RudyGiuliani & the lawyers negotiating these contracts to coordinate manufacturing dirt on Biden:
Soliciting foreign donations, 52 USC 30121.
Felony coordination.
Also adds to state extortion case.
@manhattanDA should indict.
https://t.co/B2UYP3TlSr </blockquote>
That we’re seeing these articles tells me SDNY is in fact looking to use a larger conspiracy wheel as a story line to indict and convict Rudy et al for the ‘spokes of the wheel’ crimes that Rudy, DiGenova, Toensing will be indicted for (along with Parnas and Fruman who have already been indicted). Like the Roger Stone case, the prosecutors will make Trump the focus of the trial (without actually indicting him) and prove to the jury that the accused did what they did for Trump and to protect Trump.
That sets Trump up to be prosecuted for these crimes post-term.
I think he's obviously willing to piss off allies and opponents (except Putin), he's just not willing to suffer the public humiliation and defeat of watching his veto be overridden by Congress.
Same thing happened in 2017 when Congress by near unanimous consensus passed additional sanctions on Russia for their election interference. He balked but didn't dare risk the early defeat of having his veto overridden, so signed the bill begrudgingly. But he did drag his feet kicking and screaming the whole way when it came to ordering Treasury to follow the congressional mandate and.enforce the sanctions.
What's funny is how his supporters later tried to point to sanctions as evidence he'd been tougher on Russia than any previous president when that was all due to Congress.
I love this interview with Andrew Welssman, perhaps the most renown and tenacious prosecutor formerly on the Mueller team.
My favorite quote is when Weissman responds to Maddow’s assertion that each day we get new evidence which reinforces or confirms the narrative that Trump extorted the Ukrainian gov for campaign donations. Weissman recounts that when he was “a baby prosecutor”, he used to go to his old boss, excited that he had found a new piece of evidence further confirming their theory of the case, and his boss would reply, “Why do you sound so surprised? THEY’RE GUILTY!”.
There’s only one story here and thanks to the efforts of the House Dems, a clear path: Trump is guilty and he will either go to jail when he is voted out of office or he will resign in exchange for a deal to avoid prosecution (possibly mixed w/some pardons).
https://youtu.be/1fYLTRyOr2o
Yeah what's especially hilarious about that are the magatards who think that's his real body.
Not the first former bank official associated with trump loans with Russian links to purportedly kill himself either.
It's not like these guys were homeless and broke. For all practical purposes they were set for life.