MovieChat Forums > Tabbycat > Replies
Tabbycat's Replies
Agreed.
I also thought they definitely did jell.
For about 30-40 minutes, I was getting more than my fill of Hathaway’s character resisting this guy’s obvious appeal. I don’t like people who chronically act guarded.
But then … cracks appear, and we realize she’s definitely got her reasons, mostly in the form of Reid Scott playing one of the biggest asshole exes to ever grace the screen. I don’t respect people who can’t see what’s important and always have a reason not to do the thing that they absolutely should do, and for the first half she was that. Her lowest point was claiming, in response to Hayes telling her all the things he felt, that she was ashamed. My opinion changed when she finally admitted that she did feel all those things also.
🎯💯
negro, n. — sumpn a outtatouch white guy thinks it’s okay to use as if it’s 1973
I liked the film up till the ending.
Then I hated her.
She actually looked at the cat on the bed, apparently thought nothing of it, and then left both creatures to die. For me that negates any point of view she might have had and just reduces her to just another uber-narcissist.
Definitely.
As in definitely not.
It was.
But why single that out when the entire movie was preposterous.
Uh, no.
She’s not “in this category.”
Bish was no great beauty but could actually act.
I don’t think there is.
Preposterous plots filled with events that could never happen in this world can’t be made convincing even with better makeup. This flick is pure Hollywood BS — the reason I steer clear of factory output today.
“How was I?”
“Fabulous. For a shit B-movie, I mean.”
Stupid ending.
Some kind of nonsense feminist fantasy.
Up till that point, Hanna had proven herself to be strong snd sensible. Lighting that fire and walking out flushed that all away.
Ruined what was, until then, a decent and tense drama. It even had a point.
“ The change in the milk shakes did not occur until 1965 after the brothers had sold their interest in the company. Not sure why they insisted on putting that in the film.”
I’m pretty sure why — to show that Kroc didn’t give one tin sh*t about food quality.
Powdered milkshakes?
Hey hon — let’s get the kids and all go out for strawberry Crystal Light.
Two ideas:
1. Punctuation
2. Complete sentences
Huh?
- everyone
Because you said so.
More evidence?
How about any?
Your reply “proves” that you confuse opinion with fact and are ignorant of the definition of “proof.”
No.
Fats even says so near the end: “It was you all along!”
The scene where Fats blinks and turns his eyes, apparently unaided by Corky, is simply a reflection of Corky’s twisted imagination. It happens near the ending when Corky stabs himself, an indication of his realization that Fats was always him.
Disgusting.
Glad they showed it though because I’m sure it happened.
No one doubts men can be absolute pigs.
Absolutely were.
Get glasses.
It’s a fair point that so many women in the film kept silent or justified the abuse.
All that is required for evil to triumph is that good men do nothing.
Same goes for good women.
“ Surely the scene at the meeting where the hall erupts in applause when Hank gives his speech shows that most of the men agreed that what had been going on was unacceptable.”
Surely you remember the men grabbing their crotches and saying GET THE FUCK OUT BITCH and worse *before*;his speech shamed them into silence?
And don’t call us Surely.