MovieChat Forums > FatherStack1987 > Replies
FatherStack1987's Replies
It would be nice to have a good user friendly app. I only own a tablet and it's easy enough to use for the most part, but an app would be way more convenient.
Yeah, he just got way too political. That shit is hit and miss with me. We get it, you're a Capitalist!!!
Same goes for the first one đŸ˜‚
This is miles better than Street Fighter. My brother and I used to watch this a lot when we were younger. My uncle taped it for us back in the day and I still remember the little advert that was on Sky Movies just before MK started.
I know it's a shitty film, but I happen to love a lot of shitty films. I'm not looking at this though nostalgia glasses, because I'm well aware of its many flaws. They CGI is atrocious, the acting is iffy at times, but it's still one of my favourite films and I have as much as I love the games, it's this movie that inspired my second tattoo the stunts are excellent, the action is non-stop, its endlessly entertaining and Christopher Lambert as Rayden is absolutely perfect casting. It also has one of the best theme tunes EVER!
I do honestly think it's a well made film. Would I have liked gore in this, just like the games? Of course I would, but I don't miss it and I think it is still incredibly fun without it. This is a very important film to me and I adore it, warts and all. I think it stands up very well nowadays and I probably enjoy it better now that I did back in the nineties.
DBS is a film that was so cool and awesome when I was about 12. I watch it now and it is laughably bad. This sequel will maybe be the same. Most people who say it is an incredible film is definitely looking at it through nostalgia glasses. It is really poorly made. I do like LL Cool J and SLJ in it though.
HAHAHAHAHA!
Fuck superhero movies. I was only mildly fond of them, to begin with, now they are like a plague.
I agree with you almost word for word. I love low budget B-Movies. I love gross-out movies. But I just didn't enjoy this. It wasn't nearly as entertaining as I expected it to be. I was actually kind of bored of it in a weird way. It was also far too long. It could have been trimmed by about twenty minutes and you wouldn't lose anything in terms of the plot. There is no plot whatsoever. It just seems like a bunch of gross ideas sewn together. I also don't care for that Troma-like humour. I do, however, really like the special effects and I did find the shoplifting scene quite funny.
It's a really good film and I'm glad to see a genuinely atmospheric film that doesn't rely on cheap jump scares the way most Hollywood films do, but it's just a possession movie. It is the scariest movie ever, only if it's your first ever horror movie.
Overall, it's very entertaining, just not nearly as frightening as everyone is making it out to be. This does not make it a bad film though. No doubt Hollywood will try and make a jump scare ridden remake in the future.
The CGI in the original is hilariously bad. Especially during that death scene. It was made in 1999, so I suppose it can be forgiven.
I haven't seen it, so can't comment, but the original is only about a 5/10 in my opinion, so the sequel can't be much worse :'D
To view, no. To buy, yes.
I'll definitely check it out.
Wow! She looks so much older.
As long as there's an audience for these kinds of films, probably never, sadly.
The first one was just okay. It's a decent shark movie, but nothing special. Why wait nineteen years to make a sequel to a film that wasn't all that great in the first place?
How about www.Moviechat.org ! :D
I absolutely hear it too!!!
Yeah, I said a similar thing in another post. It does have a sleazy vibe to it at times, even though he only co-wrote and produced it and never actually directed it. Still, it can't be a coincidence, can it?!
Not even in the top 100.
Could be "No Vacancy".