Why isn't the Hulk getting his own movie?
To date, the only one he has is Norton's Incredible Hulk. All the other Marvel characters have two or three sequels by now. He's treated as just a side character acting as filler for other characters.
shareTo date, the only one he has is Norton's Incredible Hulk. All the other Marvel characters have two or three sequels by now. He's treated as just a side character acting as filler for other characters.
shareI don't think Marvel/Disney ever got the rights from Universal to do another solo Hulk movie (probably why they put Planet Hulk into Thor 3)
shareI was just reading that there is basically a standalone Hulk movie being weaved into Thor 3, Infinity War, and Avengers 4.
I think that might mean that Avengers 4 will be the completion of the Planet Hulk / World War Hulk storyline that started in Age of Ultron when he left, and of course ended up on Sakaar in Ragnarok.
Maybe after his troubles in Infinity War, Hulk will take over Banner and his uncontrolled ego will make him into the villain.
I hope so!
It's not easy being green.
[none]
Universal owns the license to Hulk at the moment. Disney could do a collab like they did with Sony-owned Spider-Man, but from what I've heard, Universal just isn't interested, and Disney is doing fine without it.
shareHulk and Spidey were household names decades before many of these b-list super heroes got their own movies.
I'd love to see Ruffalo in his own Hulk movie, he's far better than Edward Norton.
Norton in all the Avengers movies would've been frickin mindblowing
shareNorton’s excellent, but “That’s my secret, I’m always angry” - that line only works from Ruffalo (who does indeed seem to be always angry)
Norton’s line might’ve been a more resigned, “that’s my secret, I don’t HAVE to be angry”
I can’t even imagine what Norton would’ve been like as Banner in Wakanda. Mildly annoyed? He definitely wouldn’t have been crowing loudly at Thor’s return
Issues with Universal over what rights Marvel has to the character and vise-versa.
share