MovieChat Forums > What We Do in the Shadows (2015) Discussion > Really bad but critics liked it-why?

Really bad but critics liked it-why?


The audience got only a handful of laughs out of this. Very disappointing-- especially considering RT critics liked it. Something rotten at Rotten Tomatoes. It has maybe 30 minutes of comedy, the rest was like a Saturday Night live skit gone too long. Why would the movie critics social clic review this so high?

reply

Critics are so annoying with what they like. I never go by them anymore. In fact, if they hate something, I usually like it.

reply

Continue liking crap like Paul Blart 2 then. That's your choice.

reply

it was a great idea and i loved the concept but it feels like the humor was really thin.
it looks like they had the basic premise but didnt focus enough

the fact that the movie has 120 hours of improv footage only proves that they did not have the humor perfected. and were just going by the motions

with a better script and a more focused story this could be amazing, i almost wish this got remade for the US because the concept is great

the execution sucked. i would have preferred the actors to follow a strict script than just improvising aimlessly like they did
improv can be funny but sometimes it can hurt a movie

reply

The US would crap all over this and make it completely unfunny. Our remakes have a way of doing that. A lot of this was subtle and amazing humor, which the US is terrible at.

reply

not if the guys behind Superbad and Pineapple express got behind it. Judd Apatow would be able to completely fix this movie and make it much better

reply

We'll have to agree to disagree on that. Apatow is very hit and miss with me. Aside from Freaks and Geeks, Undeclared, the first Anchorman, 40 Year Old Virgin, and the first half of Pineapple Express, I find most of the stuff he's involved with to be completely unfunny and repetitive. It's been nearly 10 years since I've fully enjoyed anything he's put his name on. I thought this was perfect the way it was. I love British, Aussie, and Kiwi humor.

reply

"The US would crap all over this and make it completely unfunny."

It's hard to say there's a single moment in the film as is. I don't see how a US remake could be any less funny.

reply

The US would crap all over this and make it completely unfunny.


You mean like how it already is?

BUGS

reply

There's some funny stuff in it but it wasn't consistent enough for me. A definite Python feel to it too (the mundanities of life but seen through extraordinary eyes). It was good but probably could've been better

reply

Critics always give higher marks to foreign films, just for being foreign. Probably they want to appear sophisticated and worldly.

reply

Because it's actually good?

CG GORE IS THE WORST THING THAT HAS EVER HAPPENED TO THE HORROR GENRE!

reply

Because it's awesome? Better than any comedy to come out of the US within the past 10+ years.

Burt Wonderstone sucked majorly, btw.

reply

Is that really necessary?

-Dad, who's that?
-Oh, that? One of my patients. He's...sick.
-Will he live?
-It's looking grim.

reply

Yes.

reply

I think this guy would find Jim Carrey comedy actually funny

reply

I loved it too. It's similar to FotC which doesn't appeal to a lot of people either.


FotC? I thought it was more like MouTP or maybe KFTW. It was nothing like DRoTV.

reply

[deleted]

I´m sorry i have to disagree mate, because TLB looks more like EpTLcD which is close to FRLM, but, despite similarities, FRLM is not as funny as DDPLwWM§§(has the highest score so far). All in all, i really appreciated Wwdits, very funny but, Wpptrlmnbsp takes the cake. Cheers.

reply

I was actually trying to undersatand what movies you were talking about.

reply

Hehe, sorry mate it was a simple sarcastic rant. :D
Because i find it ridiculous the amount of acronyms, that many times, makes reading a worthless/frustrating endeavor for us(readers).

reply

AMEN !

reply

Wtf are you people talking about, can't you spell the movies names or too lazy??

reply

Exactly! I was thinking what the hell are they goes on about, lazy little toerags.
+1

reply

Wtf are you people talking about, can't you spell the movies names or too lazy??

reply

Its times like this when I wish I could "like" posts cause that was fantasic

Pointing me out on spelling is just one hell of a poor argument..

reply

I dont know...it had sum TRC crossed w/BFG with a sprinkle of FEJ?..but the ending was more WPM than anything Ive recently watched

reply

[deleted]