MovieChat Forums > Wreck-It Ralph (2012) Discussion > Why did the villain have to be gay?

Why did the villain have to be gay?


What was the point of making King Candy effeminate? Would he have been any less effective a villain had he been straight?

reply

Why does there have to be a reason? What's the problem with it?

reply

He's the only non-hetero-normative character in the film. If they made the hero gay there would be some big public outcry that Disney were trying to indoctrinate children with positive gay images, but apparently it's just fine for children to be indoctrinated with negative gay images.

reply

Wow, I don't think that thought has ever crossed my mind. King Candy seemed like a regular villain to me, and if it's the voice people are picking up on, I didn't think it sounded gay, if anything, it reminded me of Doom from Roger Rabbit, when his toon character was revealed.

reply

I agree, though I'll the the voice reminded me more of Snacklepuss

reply

He's supposed to sound like Ed Wynn (Uncle Albert from Mary Poppins). He did a character referred to as "the perfect fool." King Candy was an homage, and a funny voice doesn't necessarily equate homosexuality. Something else does, but they wouldn't show that in a family movie.

A giddy cartoon character?

reply

He also looks like the Mad Hatter from Disney's cartoon " Alice in Wonderland", which I believe was also voiced by Wynn.

reply

Yes, Ed Wynn was both the voice and visual model for the Mad Hatter.

Misc. Trivia: The March Hare (Jerry Colonna)was a regular on Bob Hope's radio show in the 40's. And, Ed Wynn's firechief character in The Absent-Minded Professor was a nod to Wynn's character on radio in the early 30's, The Texaco Firechief. (I'm an oldtime radio nut)

reply

I agree. He sounded just like Ed Wynn. I had to look up who was doing such a great impersonation of him. Love Alan Tudyk.

I didn't once think it sounded "effeminate" or "gay". It was just a villain who sounded like he should have been on the side of "good".


"You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means."

reply

THAT'S THE GUY! Thank you so much for pointing that out for me here. I knew that voice felt so bloody familiar, and now i get why. Easily the stand-out performance in the movie, and the more I watch it the more I'm impressed with not only the voice acting but how maddeningly reminiscent the king is to other older Disney characters.

Then I saw who played King Candy and literally exclaimed "Holy ****!", twice. He nailed it.

reply

Guess again. Hollyweird liberals have no problem putting their agenda in kids movies. How to train your dragon 2 has a gay character. It was announced the other day Craig Ferguson's was gay.

reply

Yeah gay never crossed my mind either. The only person he reminded me of was the Mad Hatter.

65 Roses = Cystic Fibrosis

reply

I agree with DW. When I first watched it I thought he sounded like Burt's father on Mary Poppin's. I don't remember anything that made him seem gay.

reply

So don't have gay people in film. Isn't that worse, also gays can be good or evil like straights. Your ULTRA PC is borderline bigotry.

HI F-ING YA
Nicholas Cage Deadfall

reply

> gays can be good or evil like straights.

I agree. It would be great if there were some equivalence of representation of gays in both negative and positive roles. But where are the representations of gays in lead hero roles? Oh right, there aren't any.

> Your ULTRA PC is borderline bigotry.

Kindly explain how.

reply

Brokeback mountain, Paranorman, many art-house films(Go watch a Jarman film). You mean 50/50 most movies have men as villains, so does that mean films are sexist towards men?

HI F-ING YA
Nicholas Cage Deadfall

reply

Bruno? (Sorry can't do the umlaut.)

Sure he was an ass but you felt for him by the end.

And for the other guy, Paul may be the only recent flick I can think of that had a female antagonist.

There's a slogan written here. 'Happiness Will Walk Away'...

reply

He was just as camp as Fix-It Felix.

reply


I wish we could "like" or give a thumbs up to certain posts. If I could, I would give you a huge thumbs up. I was thinking the same thing. People get so damn offended at everything. We've become a nation of pansies, no pun intented.



"I've noticed that everybody who is for abortion has already been born." Ronald Reagan.

reply

Can I thumbs this up?

reply

Wow, I never heard anyone comment that the Toymaker in "Babes In Toyland" was gay or the Gatekeeper in the "Wizard of Oz." I thought the King Candy sounded just like them. All those characters were flamboyant for sure, but does that equate to gay? Maybe, maybe not. It doesn't make a bit of difference to the plot of the films, and if parents weren't complaining about it in the 30's and 40's and all the subsequent years those films have been classics, why the hell are we talking about in in 2013??

reply

It's not playing the villain as gay or straight per se. The characterization was based on Ed Wynn, who played the Toymaker in "Babes in Toyland," Uncle Albert in "Mary Poppins," and the Mad Hatter in "Alice in Wonderland," among dozens of other tv and movie roles, not to mention his large amount of time spent on the stage before moving to moving pictures. Wynn was straight, despite the vocal and visual cues that we now associate with being "gay."

reply

Well, we are talking about this in 2013, (whether you're referring to the old classics, or current movies,) because it is important to us. When these older classics came out it was tabboo to talk about them. Being gay was seen as a very negative traight. Those of us who are tired of the bigotry don't beleive that it is ok to brush it under the rug anymore. If things are going to be equal, then they need to truley be equal. I'm sure that many would say that I fall into that category of people who are just too overly sensative. Well, that's fine with me. Things will never change for the better, if we don't make them change. If that means bringing up "silly," things like the voice of a villian in a cartoon movie, then so be it. Those of you that think we are just being overley sensative.....well, just get the hell over it! Isn't that what you'd say to me!

reply

How do you know he's gay? I didn't see him involved in any gay activities. How do you know Ralph isn't gay?

I think what you meant to say is 'camp'... not necessarily an indicator of whether someone is gay.

reply

Why on God's Earth do you think he's gay? Did he suck a dick in a deleted scene or something? He's just cuckoo, lol. He's the stereotypical "King" in a sugary, gay (as in happy) environment. I mainly thought of him as some kind of Mad Hatter from Alice in Wonderland. A strong, normal, generic bad guy wouldn't have fitted the gleeful tone of the movie.

It's great how kids just see a sweet movie and adults immediately interpret everything as offensive, sexual, violent, abnormal.

reply

I have no issue. It's a movie, meant to be entertained, not to be offended by it

reply

It's an Illuminati thing. No matter the movie or show that's being made these days, they always throw in gay jokes/remarks/and/or characters. Or they put the obviously straight lead in some sort of awkward homosexual situation. They will always be there. It's part of the Occultist/Freemasonry homosexual agenda.

Also notice the Satan cameo during the Bad-Anon meeting and how he throws up the A-OK aka 666 sign right after Ralph acknowledges him. Another well known Occultist symbol used in almost every movie or show.

I'm sure there's a lot more in there, that's just the first two that stuck out like a sore thumb when I watched it.

Great movie though.

reply

Make sure that the tinfoil cover your head up to your ears when you watch this film! Or else the Catholic Satanic Chinese Russian Communist Fascist Corporate Jewish European Muslim Mexican Feminist Environmentalist Gay Black Canadian Yankee Redshirt Extraterrestrials will get you!

You make it sound like movies in Hollywood are all made by the same small coven of witches in a dark basement instead of something collectively undertaken by hundreds if not thousands of people.

Ironically, it's the people who go around calling other people "sheeple" who always seem to be the same people who will believe ANYTHING, no matter how crazy, as long as it comes from their shepherd of choice. And in this case, I believe yours to be Fox News?



reply

[deleted]

Your ideas are intriguing to me and wish to subscribe to your newsletter.

reply

Effeminate doesn't mean gay, he wasn't shown attracted to any male characters. Even if he was I don't see how it really matters.

reply

> Effeminate doesn't mean gay

True, although it's a pretty common stereotype used to indicate homosexuality.

> Even if he was I don't see how it really matters.

If they had portrayed the villain with stereotypical Jewish or Black mannerisms there would be a public outcry, but somehow it's OK if it's only anti-gay.

Would you think it didn't really matter if they had made the hero effeminate?

reply

He wasn't gay - you're missing the point. He was a tribute to Ed Wynn - especially the voice - the brilliant character actor. If you applied this logic you'd say why was the Mad Hatter in Disney's Alice in Wonderland gay or the laughing Uncle in Mary Poppins ...

reply

Definitely an Ed Wynn tribute. Now if it was Charles Nelson Reilly then we'd have more to talk about.

reply

exactly, he is not gay. how would you suspect a king in a world made out of candy to act?

reply

He's not gay. King Candy is modeled after the Mad Hatter from Alice in Wonderland and his voice actor, late comedian Ed Wynn. So, he's goofy like them. :)

reply

> King Candy is modeled after the Mad Hatter from Alice in Wonderland and his voice actor, late comedian Ed Wynn.

Thanks for this. I was not aware of the homage, but I checked out some clips at youtube and I see your point. But I'm sure I can't be the only person who doesn't know that reference who would thereby perceive the character as effeminate/gay.

reply

Maybe if you wouldn't be a bigot and wouldn't define this kind of behavior as gay you wouldn't have a problem.

"Nothing in this movie makes sense." said the narcoleptic.

reply

Yes, I also thought of the Mad Hatter the moment King Candy was introduced.
I didn't perceive his mannerism as homosexual nor effeminate.

reply

Who the hell thinks a CGI created character is gay? What the hell is wrong with you?

"YOU WANT THEM TO DO TRICKS!?!? I WANT THEM TO DROP OVER!!!!!!!"

reply

I agreed with you Harry. This is a family / children oriented for godsake, only a pervert thinking this way!

reply

Although OP might have brain damage, you're pretty deranged yourself, making the leap from homosexual to perverted.

----------------------
Boopee doopee doop boop SEX

reply

Thank you for that.

Ed Wynn was a well-known Jewish comedian. His mannerisms were what they were - if someone perceives them as "gay" - well, what are we supposed to do?

HOWEVER, the villain in this piece also reminded me in two ways of characters in the 1977 cartoon "Raggedy Ann": the acknowledged villain "King Koo-Koo" voiced by Paul Winchell looks an awful lot like the "Wreck-It Ralph" villain; additionally, there is a jester who talks alot like the "Wreck-It Ralph" villain - who is voiced by Alan Sues is TOTALLY GAY.

"Don't call me 'honey', mac."
"Don't call me 'mac'... HONEY!"

reply

This was exactly what I was thinking. He sounded like Ed Wynn, and acted a bit of a mix between the mad hatter and I thought a bit goofy like Uncle Albert from Mary Poppins.

reply

He's a takeoff on Ed Wynn. There is also gonna be a lotta people who joke about a lisping comic...

reply

I was going to bring this up too. You people need to get over your gay/effeminate hangups. Just because a character has a speech impediment doesn't mean he's even effeminate or gay. I thought it was just a perfect impersonation of the late great Ed Wynn, one of Disney's greatest character actors.

reply

Of course, now it makes sense. I could not determine why King Candy felt so familiar.

Ours is the Fury!

reply

I gotta say, at first I thought this was a joke or a troll post, but turns out you are serious. I did not even consider any sexuality with any of the characters because it's a cartoon and meant to be a fun time for all.

I truly do not believe the creators had an evil gay villain in mind when they filmed this. I think you're reading too deep into it.

reply

Totally agree, I thought it was trolling. Why would anyone even think that a cartoon is gay. I still dont even think he acted in any way gay not that it matters in the slightest.

Loved every character, every scene and put me in a great moood!

reply

I also thought this was a sarcastic question but if you are referring to his clothes & castle, then yes they are meant to be girly & pink. They belonged to "Princess" Venelope and he just replaced her with himself. He wouldn't be able to create new code for his king character so he just took her props and inserted himself.

reply

Did you notice when Ralph pointed out that it was pink, King Candy denied it saying "Salmon. It's obviously salmon."

"Frying pans! Who knew right?"

reply

I believe what he was supposed to be was neither gay nor effeminate, but rather foppish royalty.

He's a candy dandy.

Perhaps he was simply acting in a way that he thought royalty was supposed to act, not being true royalty himself.

reply

Not once during the movie did I ask myself; "is the king gay?". The fact that there is a lot of pink around him is because he stole the castle from princess Vanellope. Remembers that after she turns back into a princess, her dress is pink as well.
The king's/Turbo's car is white. If the castle was really his, that would have been pink as well (or the castle would have been white).

reply

The car is also Vanellope's. It is the car she is in on the picture on the side of the game console.

reply

I never noticed while watching the movie. I'll pay attention next tine I see it.

reply

Not gay...Ed Wynn. I can see how you might get confused.

reply