MovieChat Forums > Apollo 18 (2011) Discussion > Why didn't the US return to the moon???

Why didn't the US return to the moon???


Was there really some mysterious reason why the US didn't return to the moon... or did i take the movie too seriously???

reply

The US had won the space race with the Russians to land on the moon and return safely. There was nothing there to explore or discover. All future tests or research could be done in low earth orbit (i.e. the space station or the shuttle program). Plus the risk needed to leave low earth orbit to reach the moon involves going thru the Van Allen radiation belts which are extremely dangerous, and makes that kind of mission too expensive for the low payoff.

Don't try to be a great man, just be a man. And let history make it's own judgements.

reply

The Technology is definitely the primary reason why. Valorium, you have a point about the Radiation but with the right equipment, the moon might offer a lot of resources and they might mine it one day; once we begin to develop advanced space craft in the next 25 years.

reply

What are Van Allen radiation belts? Don't space shuttles cross that each time they go into outer space?

What if our whole life is a dream and when we die, we actually wake up!

reply

Indian space administration I.S.R.O. found water on moon's surface on 2009 and suddenly NASA piggybacked on this fact and started their research with ISRO's data,and planning for a close look at moon again

http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2009-09-25/us/28101776_1_c arle-pieters-moon-mineralogy-mapper-water-signature

reply

Indian space administration I.S.R.O. found water on moon's surface on 2009 and suddenly NASA piggybacked on this fact and started their research with ISRO's data,and planning for a close look at moon again


Try again. NASA's experiment was on ISRO's bus, but it was a NASA experiment. There was nothing "sudden" about it.

reply

What are Van Allen radiation belts? Don't space shuttles cross that each time they go into outer space?


Two belts of charged particles trapped by the Earth's magnetic field. The Shuttle does not go high enough to reach either of them. However they are not uniformly distributed around the Earth and there are lunar-insertion trajectories that avoid most of them as well, which Apollo used.

reply

Nope, they beat the Russians (that was the whole purpose after all) .They went there 6 times, discovered the place was pretty dull after all that effort and money, and never went back. No reason to unless you plant to set up a full time base.

reply

Is the website in the movie http://lunatruth.com/ for real?

Or is it just a PR stunt to promote the movie?

Especially when it says here on IMDB that the movie is pure science fiction, with the usual authentic camera shots from the real landing.

With all the blackened documents, it sure looks real...or maybe just another Conspiracy Theory hype!

reply

There's a Decepticon base there. It's too dangerous. I'm being DEAD SERIOUS...

reply

Ha good one...

What if our whole life is a dream and when we die, we actually wake up!

reply

Because we never went to the moon, and it was an elaborate hoax to get America's mind off the disaster that was Vietnam, and to get an excuse to get funding further for weapons in space, surveillance satellites, etc. The furthest anyone has ever been off the earth was 300 miles. That's why we never went, and no one else bothered. The upside was that it did create a beneficial union between countries for SkyLab and it continued funding for the Space Shuttle that had hundreds of flights .

Gus Grissom felt the whole thing wasn't going anywhere and an oxygen fire under suspicious circumstances kept everyone on board and not remotely thinking of blowing the whistle on the whole thing.

The Van Allen radiation belt made it a suicide mission for humans to penetrate through that amount of radiation, in addition to not having booster stages large enough to complete the mission and come back. Werner Von Braun once theorized it would take a rocket the size of the Empire State Building to make such a trip.

But thats just a conspiracy theory.

We actually did go to the moon....didn't we?

""A Columbian Enterprise to Endeavor for the Discovery of Atlantis. . . and all Challengers shall be destroyed."
-William Cooper

reply

No, they never went to the Moon.

reply

They returned 5 times.

What we have here is failure to communicate!

reply

Thats hilarious@!

reply

For the same reason we don't have a manned spaceflight program now -- we were going broke. It cost a ton, we'd already done it 8 times, and the economic consequences to fight in Vietnam AND push forward with all the Great Society programs were beginning to be felt by the time of Apollo 18 (hence the economic misery of the 1970s).

reply

Awesome to read so many opinion!.
Because i always wonder the same thing than OP!

Prostitute: What the *beep* are you doing?
Johnny: I'm gonna kill a bunch of people.

reply

After Apollo 11 landed on the moon and the U.S. had beaten the Russians in the Great Moon Race, Americans quickly lost interest in future missions. Even prior to the landing, Americans bitched and moaned about the money being spent on Apollo all during the 1960s. A frequent refrain was, "Why are they spending all that money on going to the moon when we need (fill in the blank) right down here on earth?"

As the movie, Apollo 13, illustrates, the Apollo 13 mission (which was only the third manned lunar landing mission) was not being closely followed by Americans until the near disastrous accident occurred. After the successful return of Apollo 13, Americans lost interest once again. The Apollo missions were so successful, except for 13, that they became viewed as routine, just as Space Shuttle launches were until the Challenger blew up.

By the early 1970s, the heady days and the pioneering spirit that JFK brought to the country were long gone. Visions for advancing manned space exploration, including going to Mars and beyond, ended in the filing cabinets and waste baskets at NASA. Instead of a mission to Mars, the U.S. pursued a mission to low earth orbit that continues until this day.

U.S. administrations since Nixon have had to justify the expense of continuing space exploration to an ever more skeptical and cynical public. In 2012, does anyone hear a drumbeat of public opinion demanding more expenditures on space exploration? The same was true in 1972.







reply