Earth should have been fine. PLOT HOLE


Near the end of the movie they say that the meteor will arrive a week early.

Pretty much means it's going to miss us. How the hell does the meteor still hit us?

Learn to science, hollywood.

reply

It's a MOVIE.........

reply

So true. It's really not a plot hole, though. There was something included in the film about how the government may have intentionally given the wrong date (we can presume various reasons the government would do that). So if they knew the correct date all along and knew for sure that the asteroid was on a direct course to hit Earth, then Earth would not have been fine.

People here say that the government wouldn't be able to fool everyone and that there would have been others out there trying to notify people of the real date of impact. This is completely true, however since forms of communication were already breaking down and since we're only seeing one local TV news broadcast and hearing news reports on one radio station, there's no way for us to say that there weren't people out there trying to notify the world of the correct impact date.



reply

Not a plot hole in the slightest. It even says at the bottom of the newscast "Conspiracy Theorists: The Government Knew!".

It's entirely plausible the government withheld the true impact date to prevent too much violence from happening, as the worst of it would probably be right before contact.

reply

It's funny how the OP and most people on this board missed the ENTIRE point of this film. Idiots.

reply

It's funny how the OP and most people on this board missed the ENTIRE point of this film. Idiots.


It's not a matter of "missing the point", it's a matter of knowing physics well enough that that kind of error jumps up and hits you in the face or not knowing physics that well.

For those who are on about how the government could easily cover it up, most asteroids are discovered by amateur astronomers who do not work for or receive any support from the government. As asteroids go, 75 mile diameter is huge--out of the more than 20 million asteroids, fewer than 200 are larger than that size.

For those who are on about how the stupid scientists can't calculate trajectories, remember that we have been using the exact same math to deliver payloads to other planets for decades. Shoemaker-Levy hit Jupiter right on schedule. Off by a second or two maybe, off by a week at two weeks to impact, no. For those who are on about "dim objects", once it's determined that it's going to hit, every effing telescope in the world is going to be pointed at it, including the Hale, the Hubble, the Keck, the VLT, and all the other glass monsters. And every radiotelescope in the world is going to be bouncing radar off it--Arecibo, the VLA, and all the rest of those. Its trajectory is going to be one of the most precisely known quantities in history.

reply

Yeah. If they couldn't come up with 3 weeks worth of stuff to write in the script, they should have made the timeline 2 weeks to begin with. Seriously, it makes no sense to suddenly say "Oops, we were off by a week." What purpose did that serve other than to lurch the plot forward.

reply

It's not a plot hole, they said in the final news cast that the government knew when it would arrive, but lied about it.

reply

Really? It is a story. It was meant to add dramatic effect. They all thought they had one more week left but their life was cut short once again. When will people stop looking at movies to see if they are realistic? A movie's purpose is not to be realistic but to bring a story to life and evoke emotion in the viewer.

reply

A plot hole can’t be reconciled with any explanation. The meteor arriving early was explained to the extent that was necessary by the suggestion of a government conspiracy. This wasn’t a disaster movie like Deep Impact or Armageddon, it was a relationship movie/love story set during end of world events. The timing of the meteor was irrelevant because the story unfolds under the context that the end is inevitable. It was done to add a sense of urgency and finality to the closing scenes and illustrated perfectly how fleeting time really is.

reply

[deleted]

I hate to assume but I have here. I Assumed that, there would be some scientific advisers around for a film such as this. And if it was in the script that they got their maths WAY wrong by millions of miles, then someone would have spotted it, especially if the likes of you and me have done.
So-I think that its taken that, it is a deliberate attempt by the authorities to soften the blow. To make a week of worry and riots, all of a sudden--
-a day.


Thoughts?

reply

The whole discussion here of the science involved is no doubt interesting. But imo too many posters on IMDb have a fetish about the whole "I found a plot hole!" angle.

Films are works of fiction for hte most part. The question should not so much be in discussing whether some development is a plot hole as to whether the occurence of such development is objectively probable or even likely. It should be whether in terms of the film's narrative arc the development in question is plausible. Plausible does not even mean likely, let alone probable. It means something that is reasonably possible.

IN this film its narrative arc was not upset by the development of moving up the impact date. Sorry.

reply

It doesn't matter to the storytelling, but to fix the hole, you can think about it this way, that the exact time of impact might have been withheld by those in charge intentionally to keep things orderly until the very end.

reply