MovieChat Forums > Public Enemies (2009) Discussion > Worst cinematography in recent memory.

Worst cinematography in recent memory.


I did not see Public Enemies in a theater, only on DVD, and what I saw on DVD was the worst cinematography and lighting I can remember in mainstream contemporary cinema. Not only was it shot primarily in closeups as if it were made for TV, but the lighting seldom allowed you to see peoples' faces. Lit from the rear, everything in shadow, and looking as if the film had been dipped in a pot of coffee. Nothing to do filming in HD, just BAD lighting and camera work. As for the script, where was the character development? Why did all the gangsters look alike to the degree you couldn't tell one from another. Johnny Depp's a fine actor, but he didn't have a script with which to build a character. And not only did every man in the film have the same haircut, but they all looked like they'd had those haircuts the day before shooting. As for the miscasting of Christian Bale, all I can way is "where did he get that accent?" This film makes me long for "Bonnie and Clyde," a film in which you could actually see the actors' faces and in which the characters actually had human interaction. If you want to see a good film about Dillinger, rent John Milius' "Dillinger" with Warren Oates, who actually looked somewhat like the man.

reply

I disagree completely.

It was much more classic, than todays style... and actually felt more interesting and dynamic.

This may have been odd to people, expecting somethign they are so used to seeing...

but i found it to be a visually interesting film. It was stylized like films before 1960s... with a bit of todays flare.

reply

I agree, this movie was bad. It was a disappointment. I was expecting a good movie with Johnny Depp and Christian Bale as leads. I think they both did an "ok" job, but the movie had absolutely NO character development. I had to force myself to finish watching it.

reply

Someone needs to look up the definition of the word "hyperbole". Enough of this "worst", "best" stuff regarding any and everything. Watch some horrible indie flicks, or even a piece of Gus Van Crap like Last Days to find out what horrible cinematography really is.

I had some issues with this movie in the editing and script department, but the cinematography wasn't anywhere near the worst, even among mainstream films released that year.

reply

[deleted]

The film was shot on film for some dark interior scenes that don't have any digital noise. But I agree with you Michael Mann needs to work with the right cinematographer.

reply

Having just now seen this I have to wholeheartedly agree with you ..

I can do better on my HD cameras and certainly edit it to a higher standard...

Mind you having a rubbish script and wooden actors in Bale and Depp does not help...

Mr Mann has gone the way of George Lucas...


Almost laughable...the soundtrack can't save it either which sometimes works , not in this case ...

cheers


Fitvideo

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]