MovieChat Forums > Public Enemies (2009) Discussion > Worst cinematography in recent memory.

Worst cinematography in recent memory.


I did not see Public Enemies in a theater, only on DVD, and what I saw on DVD was the worst cinematography and lighting I can remember in mainstream contemporary cinema. Not only was it shot primarily in closeups as if it were made for TV, but the lighting seldom allowed you to see peoples' faces. Lit from the rear, everything in shadow, and looking as if the film had been dipped in a pot of coffee. Nothing to do filming in HD, just BAD lighting and camera work. As for the script, where was the character development? Why did all the gangsters look alike to the degree you couldn't tell one from another. Johnny Depp's a fine actor, but he didn't have a script with which to build a character. And not only did every man in the film have the same haircut, but they all looked like they'd had those haircuts the day before shooting. As for the miscasting of Christian Bale, all I can way is "where did he get that accent?" This film makes me long for "Bonnie and Clyde," a film in which you could actually see the actors' faces and in which the characters actually had human interaction. If you want to see a good film about Dillinger, rent John Milius' "Dillinger" with Warren Oates, who actually looked somewhat like the man.

reply

It wasn't too bad, it was just not very well lit in places causing the frames to blur together which makes the use of digital quite obvious and distracting.

reply

[deleted]

You probably just needed to adjust your color, brightness, and tint on your television.
Just kidding...
But seriously, I agree. It was just kind of dry for my taste, but seemed like it meant well, and wasn't pretentious or anything. I just couldn't get into it.

Appearances can be...deceptive.

reply

I actually couldnt watch the movie the whole way through because of the terrible cinematography..
Couldnt stand the irritating camera work..

reply

[deleted]

Some shots looked very "digital video cam", which ruined the 1930s feel for me. Other shots looked good. A digital look is not necessarily bad, but in this case, it didn't fit.

___
"What does it do?"
"It doesn't do anything. That's the beauty of it."

reply

"As far as the camera work, Michael Mann can do no wrong" Trismike21 - you don't know what you're talking about!
OP is 100% correct about the TERRIBLE Dante Spinotti cinematography! Nothing to do with Mann. However - it is casting's fault that Crudup (Depp's twin) was Hoover! To deny that this film's photography ruined a great film is merely displaying a lack of intelligence! It looked like it was filmed on a mobile phone, especially in the final scenes! The dialogue was also INAUDIBLE - but that's just standard retarded BS for the last 20 years!

reply

I thought it was good enough.

reply