MovieChat Forums > Public Enemies (2009) Discussion > Worst cinematography in recent memory.

Worst cinematography in recent memory.


I did not see Public Enemies in a theater, only on DVD, and what I saw on DVD was the worst cinematography and lighting I can remember in mainstream contemporary cinema. Not only was it shot primarily in closeups as if it were made for TV, but the lighting seldom allowed you to see peoples' faces. Lit from the rear, everything in shadow, and looking as if the film had been dipped in a pot of coffee. Nothing to do filming in HD, just BAD lighting and camera work. As for the script, where was the character development? Why did all the gangsters look alike to the degree you couldn't tell one from another. Johnny Depp's a fine actor, but he didn't have a script with which to build a character. And not only did every man in the film have the same haircut, but they all looked like they'd had those haircuts the day before shooting. As for the miscasting of Christian Bale, all I can way is "where did he get that accent?" This film makes me long for "Bonnie and Clyde," a film in which you could actually see the actors' faces and in which the characters actually had human interaction. If you want to see a good film about Dillinger, rent John Milius' "Dillinger" with Warren Oates, who actually looked somewhat like the man.

reply

[deleted]

It looked more like a live broadcast than a movie. But I suppose it could have been worse - it could have been in 3D.

reply

It looked like a strait-to-DVD movie. The most disappointing movie of 2009.

The Expendables- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C6RU5y2fU6s

reply

[deleted]



. the fella that brought us the masterpiece that is heat, now down to shooting this crap with some of the worst cinematography ive ever seen. he has lost it, why shoot this way, its pure rubbish. could not believe what I was actually watching. I'll say it again, the guy that brought us heat.....now brings us trash from a 12 year old with a camera

reply

come on...

everyone here sounds like a jealous film student.

and obviously that is exactly the case.... being this is a Mann film and you're all studying it.. jealously.

reply

Here's a thought - if you're going to break the rules of film language be sure to have a REASON for it. There was no reason to shoot Public Enemies with such piss-poor conduct and then hide behind that feeble 'Artistic' parade that so many badly-made films claim to be.

reply

Piss poor is an opinion. It was unconventional, but that doesn't make it bad. Why do you imply that it's cinematography has no meaning behind it? If you study Mann's work, it's clearly something he's intentionally doing and not just the result of fumbling around with a camera.

A majority of the people who don't like the way the film looks, can't even explain their opinions past the fact that they just don't like it.

reply

Killer cast Great story. SHOT IN CHEAP VIDEO?! ! !?! ! ARE YOU KIDDING ME? ? ? the director and the DP should publically hanged.

reply

Yeah its poorly made. Looks like its been shot on Michael Manns youngest childs toy video camera. I do not see the point of making a film that looks as *beep* as this. Could have been a good movie, although as previously mentioned there wasn't much in story or character development. Johnny Depp is a great actor but even he couldn't do much with this.

reply

I have figured out a way to make this...whatever it is...viewable in 2010. Pick up an old B&W tube type TV from the thrift store and a RF modulator from Radio Shack. Plug your Blu-Ray into the modulator and hook it to the TV. Pretend it's 1955 and you are watching a live performance of Playhouse 90.

reply

[deleted]