One one the most underrated movies.....
i totally agree with the OP!... this is definitely the best film of 2002 (even though 'City of God' was very good to, but i find myself re-watching Road to Perdition MUCH more often. in fact, i still only seen City of God (8-9/10) once where as Road to Perdition i seen MANY times).
i give 'Road to Perdition' a 10/10, no less than a 9/10 for sure! it's a masterpiece and i don't fling that word around often either.
but it does seem like this film slipped under the radar on the mainstream level for some reason as not to many people seem to know about it unless you a movie fan like i am and others are on this site. because usually with actors like Tom Hanks that usually guarantee's it would be pretty well known but it seems like when people talk about Tom Hanks films this never comes into the picture when i personally think this IS his best film and he's had quite a few good/great ones.
It wasn't even included in Empire's 500 Greatest Movie list.
that's got to be a sad list. lol
here is the list
http://www.empireonline.com/500/.
i am going over the list now and while there's a good percentage of those i have not seen some of the GREAT films are WAY TO LOW on there list. take 'Braveheart' (1995) for example which is #320 on there list. so according to them there is 319 BETTER films than that? , NOT A CHANCE. lol ... heck, even 'The Green Mile' (1999) is in #331 which is also a joke (it's far better). because in terms of 'pure entertainment etc' there's pretty much ZERO chance that there is THAT MANY films better than those two and i think ALOT of people would agree with me on that much. i am sure there's lots of others that i could find to but that should be enough to get the point across about there list being questionable because ill bet if you took 'regular people' and asked them what's some of there favorite movies it would be quite a bit different from the lists shown here especially if you sampled people in the age range of 50's or younger... but to be honest there would not even be 500 movies worthy of me claiming 'best movies of all time' level simply because out of the 1100-ish films i had seen there's only a fairly small percentage of that, that i rated higher than a 8/10.
because there's NO WAY there is 500 movies that are better than Road to Perdition out there. i would say it's unlikely there is even 100 in my eyes. but for me personally it would definitely be within my Top50-ish (most likely higher) of all time off the top of my head.
BUT... it does seem most of those 'best movies of all time lists' are based more around how they effected the movie industry/getting oscar's etc etc more than just being a great film. (not saying Oscar films can't be great but there's LOTS of great films that are blown off by those Oscar award type people)
but then again i have to recognize that EVERYONE's 'all-time lists' will vary at least some and i am sure the people who made that list seen quite a few more movies than i have.... i seen roughly 1100-1200 range myself based on looking at my 'Vote History' although some of my 1200+ stuff aint all movies but even then i should still be around 1100-ish of that that are solely movies. but even seeing the amount of 1100 or so that i seen, that still ain't no small number and gives me, in imho, more credibility (at least a little bit) vs someone who might have seen 50-75 films tops because from my perception, people who have not seen many movies (but have at least some interest in films) tend to be entertained easier vs someone who has seen a lot. i am not trying to sound arrogant or anything but i am being honest here as i think i make at least a decent argument.
but seriously... i think films prior to 1960-ish just plain ain't nearly as good as stuff in the last 20-40 years or so 'ON AVERAGE' especially when your looking at GREAT LEVEL (i.e. 9/10 or higher) films. because from my perception stuff prior to the 1960's just seems plain DATED in general. (i know there is exceptions but 'generally speaking' i think i make a very strong point)... because i don't think there is a single film i would personally rate higher than a 8/10 PRIOR TO 1960's (i will admit there's very few films i seen prior to the 1960's but it's mostly because, even if they turn out somewhat good, they just aint nearly as good as THE BEST stuff out there imho). because the oldest film i had seen that i am a pretty big fan of is 1961's 'The Hustler' with Paul Newman in it.
p.s. there is one film i am a huge fan of that i would consider a masterpiece in the 2000's along with 'Road to Perdition' and that is 'Lord of War' (2005) (10/10, this film got better with repeat viewings. i seen it many times now) ... as like i said before, each have solid cinematography and great music that fits the film perfectly etc etc. those are two of the few films since 2000 to date i would consider a masterpiece myself as they have the 'art' side to them besides just being a great film.
---
My Vote History ...
http://www.imdb.com/mymovies/list?l=11026826---
reply
share