Putin has been saying out loud that Ukraine entering the NATO is a risk that goes beyond acceptable for Russia
That's very true, and makes a lot of sense, but then there's this....
Why looking for some hidden secret motivation when the stated one is absolutely logical? Sometimes a hat is only a hat.
Well, because of this...
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/13/us/politics/nato-ukraine.html
Basically, Ukraine couldn't and still can't join NATO because it's not a proper democracy (it's one of the most corrupt countries in the index ranking, so much so even Beijing Biden noted they didn't have an
actual properly functioning democracy back in 2014, which is one of the requirements for joining NATO). The country has also been in conflict with Russia for years, and NATO can't allow a country to join that's in direct conflict with a nuclear superpower.
So technically, Putin really had nothing to worry about so long as his troops stayed at the Ukrainian border and so long as Ukraine maintained a corrupt power index (both which seemed to be persistent enough to void allegiance with NATO).
However, to your point, just because Ukraine didn't
officially meet the NATO standards doesn't mean some hanky panky couldn't be pulled to force them into the fold, which would then have put Putin on the defense instead of the offense. So you could be right that Putin was simply being proactive and preemptive in striking first before strings were pulled to (illegally?) yank Ukraine into the NATO fold.
reply
share