MovieChat Forums > General Discussion > WHO,WHAT,WHY IS KOWALSKI?πŸ€”

WHO,WHAT,WHY IS KOWALSKI?πŸ€”


THERE SEEM TO BE THREE KINDS OF PEOPLE...THOSE WHO LIKE ME...THOSE WHO HATE ME...AND THOSE CONFUSED BY ME WHO WILL EVENTUALLY SETTLE INTO ONE OF THE FIRST TWO GROUPS...HAS BEEN THAT WAY MY ENTIRE LIFE...AND FOR GOOD REASON...I AM A STRANGE PERSON...I HAVE NO FILTER AND I ALWAYS INSERT MY HONEST THOUGHTS AT MAXIMUM VOLUME...I HAVE OCD...ADHD...AND I AM ON THE SPECTRUM...SHELDON FROM THE BIG BANG THEORY IS A GOOD COMPARISON...JUST SUBSTITUTE MOVIES/TV/POP CULTURE FOR PHYSICS AND COMIC BOOKS...MY FATHER'S FAVORITE SHOW IS THE BIG BANG THEORY AND HE RECENTLY TOLD ME IT'S BECAUSE SHELDON REMINDS HIM OF ME AND HELPS HIM UNDERSTAND ME BETTER...THE CAPS I TYPE IN ARE JUST AN EXTENSION OF MY PERSONALITY...AN EXTENSION I USED THE FIRST TIME I EVER ENCOUNTERED THE INTERNET 20+ YEARS AGO AND HAVE KEPT USING ON EVERY SITE EVER SINCE...

SO...IF YOU DON'T HATE THE BIG BANG THEORY...A LOT OF PEOPLE SEEM TO...THE SHOW HAS HELPED AT LEAST ONE PERSON UNDERSTAND ME BETTER.πŸ™‚

reply

I find the way you express yourself ignorant and off-putting, and I don't take anything you say seriously because you exhibit no evidence of thought or research.

That said, try watching, or having your dad watch the show "Atypical". It's pretty good about an autistic son in a family, or "The Good Doctor" about an Asperger's boy who becomes a doctor.

reply

[–] brux (12429) 10 hours ago
I find the way you express yourself ignorant and off-putting, and I don't take anything you say seriously because you exhibit no evidence of thought or research.

DITTO.

That said, try watching, or having your dad watch the show "Atypical". It's pretty good about an autistic son in a family, or "The Good Doctor" about an Asperger's boy who becomes a doctor.

THANKS.

reply

You're an odd duck, but in a good way.

reply

πŸ§œπŸΎβ€β™‚οΈ

reply

Idk you seem pretty normal to me, but maybe that says more about me than you. I do hate the Big Bang Theory, but I like you, you're alright. You liking VHS tapes, Wonderwall and cherry coke, and being able to annoy the shit out of certain posters while doing the bare minimum is a plus in my book.

reply

I DO LOVE THOSE THINGS...I ALSO LOVE ANNOYING DICKHEADS...I APPRECIATE YOU.πŸ™‚

reply

Cheers, I appreciate myself too. But I love that you love annoying dickheads the most.

reply

I'd like to understand the Hitch situation.

reply

THAT IS ACTUALLY MY DAUGHTERS...SHE IS GOING TO BE A LOT LIKE ME...IN GOOD AND BAD WAYS...THE COLLECTION STARTED AS A JOKE...IRONIC...IT HAS BECOME A GENUINE PASSION PROJECT FOR HER AT THIS POINT THOUGH.

reply

That's cool. Is there a specific number in mind or is it just as much Hitch as y'all can find?

reply

A DOLLAR OR LESS A COPY IS THE ONLY RULE...OTHER THAN THAT IT'S BEEN AS MANY AS WE CAN FIND ON OUR HUNTS...I AM ASSUMING SHE WILL GET BORED WITH IT AT SOME POINT...SHE IS ALMOST 15...BUT IT HASN'T HAPPENED YET.

reply

"This is a mission, not a small time thing." πŸ‘

reply

I always loved that show, don't understand the hate.

My first impression of you on here from many years ago was great because it was born out of humor. I can't remember if it was you or someone else spewing a story that your cap locks key was broken hence the always all caps. However, it's obvious that you just use it for attention. I find that rarely do you attempt to engage in the actual conversation, but rather just resort to bashing the people who have a conflicting view. Certainly in terms of bluntness you are like Sheldon so I can see that. Definitely don't hate you though.

reply

BLUNT IS A WORD I HEAR ALOT IN DESCRIPTION OF MYSELF...PERHAPS I SPEND TOO MUCH TIME SEEKING OUT OPINIONS THAT CONTRADICT MY OWN...TO BE FAIR THOUGH...IT IS SO SLOW HERE SOMETIMES OTHER THAN THE DICKHOLES WITH THEIR SHITTY VIEWS...THERES THAT BLUNT NON CONVERSATION AGAIN,HUH?...I AM GOING TO THINK ON THAT A BIT...APPRECIATE THE HONEST REPLY.

reply

After re-reading my response, my words are harsher than intended. Perhaps I was in a mood last night. I do want to follow-up and say that the bluntness is welcome most of the time. I rarely respond to the dickholes, rather just ignore them and move on, but I appreciate that you do!

reply

😘

reply

I fall into the third category. I don't know if "Kowalski" is an online persona you've created and the whole thing is an act or some type of (mostly benign) trolling. You do possess a sense of humor. I just don't know how many of your comments are real or should be taken seriously.

reply

WHAT YOU GET HERE IS WHAT MY FAMILY GETS IN REAL LIFE...POOR THEM,RIGHT?

reply

[deleted]

Not true. I, and others, care.

reply

[deleted]

Why don't you make me?

reply

[deleted]

And you are a disgusting peckerhead! Better yet…A disgusting peckerhead TROLL!

reply

[deleted]

Well, let’s look at the evidence…

The all-caps, the constant vapid drama posts and failed attempts to be funny, you want to turn yourself into a brand because you have no substance and crave attention above all else.

The fact that you made this topic speaks to your pathological juvenile attention-whoring.

You also urgently crawl out of your toilet whenever someone criticises Woke Hollywood, so not only do you have nothing of value to offer in the realm of movie discussion, you're actively part of a cult that’s in the process of destroying movies.

I think I speak for everyone on Moviechat when I say that you’re a cancerous, self-absorbed cunt.

reply

β€œI think I speak for everyone on Moviechat”

You do not speak for me.

reply

Don't you just hate this arrogant, presumptuous attitude? I've come up against it time and again on here.

reply

This is not the first time that this has happened.

reply

You went curiously silent the last time we discussed this so I assumed you were in reluctant agreement: https://moviechat.org/general/General-Discussion/62dde545da9ee750bb68432e/Wheres-the-testosterone-in-modern-movie-stars?reply=62e1bbc3cb27b91eaf732997

reply

Whether I agree or not is not the issue - I merely stated that you do not speak for me. If I have something to say, I will say it.

reply

I said β€˜I think I speak for everyone…’ and in your case I was right - you do agree.

reply

Not going to argue, life is too short, think whatever you like, it changes nothing.

reply

Yeah, you agree.

reply

I do not agree that Kowalski is β€˜a cancerous, self-absorbed cunt.’

reply

Well he objectively is so… why not?

reply

This is pointless, so I shall say, β€œGood day Sir.”

reply

So you admit you agree after all - thought so.

reply

I said, β€œGood day Sir!”

reply

And in doing so (ie not denying it and running away) admitted that you agree.

Anyway, why do you keep coming back after saying β€˜this is pointless’ and β€˜good day’?

reply

Someone didn’t get the Willy Wonka reference.

reply

"I think I speak for everyone on Moviechat when I say that you’re a cancerous, self-absorbed cunt."

No, you do not speak for everyone. I, and many others, like Kowalski quite a bit and do not agree with your description of him.

reply

[deleted]

Kowalski is my 3rd favourite person on this website. He’s a cool guy 😎

reply

[deleted]

Kowalski is cooler than you, that's for sure.

reply

[deleted]

Just cutting in line here, NO apologies, yes, KOWALSKI is very well regarded here.

He’s silly, honest, probably insane…he fits right in with the good onesπŸ‘

reply

I'm here to show support for Kowalski also. The man is tip top in my book.

reply

[deleted]

KOWALSKI is my favorite lunaticπŸ˜„

reply

A lunatic would be genuinely unstable and somewhat entertaining. Kowalski is just a tedious twat trying desperately to attract attention with unfunny all-caps troll posts, and desperate look-at-me topics like this.

reply

You seem to be in the minority here, KOWALSKI is a pretty popular guy on MC and he has good taste in movies and he’s often very funny.

That’s just my honest take on the matter, we are just here to joke and have fun, I’m sorry, no offense intended.

Anyway, go choke to death sucking your own dick loser.

reply

[deleted]

He’s not well regarded, he’s a tumour forcing itself into a movie discussion forum to incessantly talk about itself - this whole topic being a prime example. Everyone hates him apart from a few fellow Church of Woke members.

reply

β€˜Church Of Woke’ πŸ˜„
You sure don’t know me, nice try at a jab dude, you only missed by a mile LOL…act that way in the real world and you’ll likely get your bell rung by the first fellow you meet;)

reply

There’s no β€˜jab’, I’m just telling it like it is.

reply

You are a misinformed fool lol. β€˜Telling it like it is…’
You are a twerp and a flash in the pan is what you are😁

reply

[deleted]

🀑

reply

[deleted]

πŸ’©

reply

[deleted]

Hurt feelings?

Aww, get in line😁

reply

[deleted]

https://moviechat.org/general/General-Discussion/62bf823867ce5d69bb609c7d/PEOPLE-WHO-SAY-I-TELL-IT-LIKE-IT-IS

reply

[deleted]

🀑

reply

[deleted]

πŸ†

reply

[deleted]

Drooch sockπŸ‘

reply

[deleted]

I've probably endured the "Nobody likes you" allegation much more than Kowalski has.

reply

Yes, but in your case it’s both true and you earned itπŸ‘Ž

reply

Trying to worm your way back into the spotlight after I handed you your ass once again, dumb shit who thinks he's a Roman emperor with his stupid, overused thumbs up or down emojis?

reply

You are a deluded weirdo, go to your Doctor and get new meds tomorrow goofballπŸ‘πŸ˜„πŸ‘

reply

Is he obfuscating again? (eye-roll)

reply

Renfield obviously sees another opportunity to grovel again.

reply

You call me Renfield as if that's a bad thing.

reply

Ok then, how about petty fucking idiot? You think you've really got something on me because I chose to replace the phrases, "confusing the issues" and "muddying the waters", with the more efficient single word of "obfuscating."

reply

I don't care that you replaced it. I'm saying you overuse it. Notice I also included your infamous "(eye-roll)?

reply

I use it in proportion to how often you do it in an argument, so if you want to see it less often, do it less often. I've already pointed that out as part of your style, along with lies and denials. Of course I noticed the (eye-roll) shot. I'm actually perceptive, but considering how much time you spend on this board, you're not, because you seem to have missed where I already explained the origin of that.

reply

Which lies and denials?

reply

They've already been responded to. Fuck off!

reply

Oh, no. db20db told me to "fuck off". What ever will I do?

reply

Just that and lick your wounds, create more and more, back to back, shallow, attention seeking threads.

reply

That's the nicest thing you've said to me. Borderline heartwarming.

reply

Is it true in your case as well?

reply

You’ll be bones in two days dummy, is anyone supposed to take this troll account seriously?

reply

[deleted]

🀑

reply

[deleted]

πŸ‘

reply

[deleted]

πŸ₯–

reply

It appears you aren’t aware of MovieChat’s standards.

#2… No trolling, flaming, spamming

”Flaming or roasting is the act of posting insults, often including profanity or other offensive language, on the internet. This term should not be confused with the term trolling, which is the act of someone going online, or in person, and causing discord. Flaming emerged from the anonymity that Internet forums provide cover for users to act more aggressively. Anonymity can lead to disinhibition, which results in the swearing, offensive, and hostile language…”


Excessive profanity

#5 on the Prohibited Content list

reply

Here comes the thought police. I’m just answering Kowalski’s question. Don’t like it? Don’t read it.

reply

OK!

reply

Don’t respond to him. He’s only here to try to upset the regulars for some reason.

reply

He’s a troll. I’m through replying to him.

reply

Good deal. He’s obviously a sock account also.

reply

Sock it to β€˜em Drooch!

reply

"Don’t like it? Don’t read it."

That is illogical because how are you going to know if you don't like it unless you read it?

reply

Wait.... wut?

reply

If someone says words to the effect, β€˜if you don’t like it, don’t read it,’ my counter is β€˜well how do I know if I like it or not, unless I read it first.’

Surely, you have to read something before you can determine whether you like it or not, right?

reply

I was bein' silly. 😜

reply

Ah, ya got me 😘πŸ€ͺ🫠

reply

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/a/ad/You_Gots_to_Chill.jpg

reply

I just popped in to answer Kowalski’s question, what’s your problem?

reply

I wasn’t asking you, dumb bitch. Go blow your boyfriend that idiotic cunt β€˜Kowalski’ and fuck off.


Yeah you’re a clown with Kowalski’s dick jammed down your throat. What a pair of cunts.


Wants to make a comeback but can’t so posts an emoji, fucking faggot.


You’re linking to another of your utterly vapid attention-whoring mong posts, you’re so self-absorbed you're quoting your own bullshit. Nobody wants to watch you eating your own shit on an endless loop, fuckhead.

reply

I’ll ask again… what’s your problem?

reply

You're completely overreacting.

reply

[deleted]

You're entitled to your opinion, but that doesn't mean you're not overreacting. There's a reason why your posts are getting deleted.

reply

Yeah, the reason is because you Wokists always resort to censorship when you cannot handle/challenge a truth you’re being told.

So don’t pretend you believe β€˜you’re entitled to your opinion’ when you’ll gleefully censor any opinion you consider verboten.

reply

There's opinion and then there's insults. Those two are way different.

reply

Did you just call Samoanjoes a wokist? That's probably the most hilarious thing in this entire thread. He is definitely not a wokist, by any definition. He is right though about you. You are seriously overrating and out of line.

reply

First time I've been called that.

reply

Stop being so woke!

reply

Free Tibet! Silence is violence!

reply

Never! All of Tibet needs to be my slaves. Anyone who doesn't look and act like me must be quiet and do what I say! Troublemakers will be beaten!

reply

I’ve been called woke twice quite recently; once by Drooch, once by Quaid, both with similar posting styles πŸ€”

reply

You are wrong, Quaido. Kowalski is indeed pretty well regarded by most of the regular posters, except for a few angry and unpleasant weirdos.

reply

[deleted]

You are obsessed with Kowalski and his genitalia.

reply

Drooch sock.

reply

[deleted]

πŸ‘Ž

reply

[deleted]

Not had much interaction with him but the bit I have had he seems like a sound geezer.

reply

You think THAT πŸ‘‡ is a β€˜sound geezer’?

reply

are you from filmboards?

reply

No, why?

reply

BECAUSE YOU SUCK JUST LIKE A FILMBOARDS SCUMBAG.

reply

Here comes the little bitch to cry and rage-dump again because he didn’t get the answer he wanted from his own conceited, attention-whoring thread 🀣

reply

You are the one who is crying and raging and picking fights with people. Calm down, Quaid.

reply

[deleted]

You have a weird obsession with Kowalski's penis.

reply

[deleted]

WHO THE FUCK ARE YOU?...DAD?...IS THAT YOU?...RANDY QUAID?...I DON'T KNOW YOU...AND CONSIDERING HOW MUCH I POST HERE...THAT SAYS SOMETHING ABOUT YOU...YOU ARE NOBODY...STILL THOUGH...I ENJOYED YOUR POST...ITS CUTE HOW MUCH YOU ENJOY MY STYLE...WHAT'S YOUR FAVORITE MOVIE?

reply

I took the time to answer your question so what are you freaking out about? Just say β€˜thank you’.

reply

KOWALSKI just PMd me, he says for me to tell you thank you which I thought was sweet of him.
I say Fuck You.

reply

There's that Big Man on Campus schtick again, as if he really needs for you to be his spokesperson. He's always had plenty of strong rhetoric on his own. Why would he suddenly need a putz like you to represent him?

reply

Nice job sucking up to the only Reg that even bothers trying to be polite to you.

You are a pathetic wimp .

reply

[deleted]

Weak.
You add nothing of value to any conversationπŸ‘Ž

reply

[deleted]

Sock.
Grow a pair and be real or piss off.
Sock accounts are trash.

reply

[deleted]

Looks like you are getting deletedπŸ˜‰

reply

Oh what a shame.

reply

Proves the Mod Squad is on board! Thanks much Mod Squad! πŸ‘πŸ»πŸ‘πŸ»

reply

Now be ready for the next sock.

reply

His garbage mouth will give him away. He is incapable of replying without wanton profanity! I don’t know how he eats with his outhouse mouth!

reply

"Stop screwing around and start doing your job!" ;)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=67cdXuWnRKs

reply

LOL! 🀭

reply

"Is this all that Mods (paraphrased) do? Sit around in cars, waiting?" :)

reply

I don’t think so. :-) They exited their cars in order to jump on this. They solved the problem of the foul mouthed insolent jerk…Quaid!

reply

I don't either. I was just spoofing some of the ongoing bitching about the Mods I've been seeing here for awhile. ;)

reply

Sorry, about being dense and not catching your β€œspoofing”. πŸ™‡πŸΌβ€β™€οΈ I believe we have a good Mod Squad so I don’t understand the bitching.

reply

Of course, Wokists always resort to censorship when faced with truths they cannot handle/challenge. Entirely to be expected.

reply

🀣

reply

[deleted]

Just keep it up with the profane name calling from your garbage mouth and you will be banned! Oh Happy, Happy day when that occurs! πŸ‘πŸ»πŸ‘πŸ»

reply

🀑

reply

”I think I speak for everyone on Moviechat…”

Thee does NOT speak for me!

reply

[deleted]

I like him better than I like you. πŸ€·πŸΌβ€β™€οΈ You are β€œthe obnoxious, cancerous, self-absorbed, attention-whoring…”

You just don’t use all-caps! πŸ™„

For the record my distant relative Kowalski has been decent to me. His replies to me are not laced with profanity. Someone needs to rake a bar of soap over your teeth!

reply

Wrong, I’m not interested in attention. I rarely post (unlike the relentless diarrhoea-posting we see from Kowalski), I just came here to answer Kowalski’s question.

Instead of trying to police thought, just don’t read truths you cannot handle.

reply