MovieChat Forums > tlm555 > Replies
tlm555's Replies
Something is wrong with your brain if you think this pile of trash was good in any way.
This movie was garbage.
You must be kidding, right?
It was ridiculous and stupid. It doesn't even deserve a 0.
Everything about it was ridiculous.
Just the idea of a living body being able to read any type of media, such as videotape, is asinine. Anyone who thinks this is amazing just doesn't understand how anything works at all.
She was a normal size. No, she wasn't anything close to a 14-inch waist.
Just because she wasn't fat and bloated doesn't mean something is wrong or abnormal about her. It's crazy how people trash healthy people with shame and hate because they are actually in good physical condition.
Lots of people who drink hot tea put cream in it.
Tea should be iced only... but then I hate ALL hot drinks.
I can't imagine how any human being could give this any more than a 1. And that's only because we can't give it a 0 or a negative number.
Yep...
His voice was, by far, the worst thing about these two movies. Having it grating on my eardrums made it difficult to pay attention at times.
I was going to say how much I hate "fan fiction" and how offended I am by it --- by any that I've read previously.
But this one was VERY GOOD. :)
That's the case EVERY TIME a movie is made from a book.
It was horribly annoying.
We had to mute it... it is a disgusting moment in the movie.
Quit being an a-hole. Get a person's name right if you are going to use it.
It takes an extremely low person to intentionally butcher someone's name; it is extremely disrespectful. And it is unacceptable. If I ran this board, you'd be blocked indefinitely.
one to??
That phrase doesn't even fit here...
You're right, that is very unpopular.
I believe the first one was far better than this one. This one got so lame at times, I had to pause and resume it on another day...
Not sure what joke you're trying to make here...
I guess it isn't a joke because if it were a joke, it would be funny.
ALL movies should be a minimum of two hours; anything less is a crime. 3 hours would be perfect... There was a time when most good movies were 2 to 3 hours.
No, I'm not saying this is good at all.
But watching a movie shorter than 2 hours is like buying a novel to find out it is only 30 pages.
It is the strangest movie I've ever seen.
It's only 2 hours... that's the very shortest a movie should ever be. 3 hours would be perfect.
But, yeah, this one is garbage.
Not necessarily.
This was a very remote area...
What are you talking about? They didn't use handheld cameras to film this movie.
One was used BY A CHARACTER IN THE MOVIE, not to make the movie.