MovieChat Forums > eucalyptusandus > Replies
eucalyptusandus's Replies
well you can't carry a sword why carry a gun? swords are where its at, we got lost its all boring guns now
threads about guns don't kill people, beliefs about threads about guns killing people kills people. or not. who fucking cares. i'm saying i was delusional that i thought i could have a gun. i live in Australia. so its a delusion to think what you would be like with a gun to a degree, if you actually think that you can carry a hand gun you can't unless your a coppa so anyway all good i'm just having a joke with you. is it a touchy subject..?
hahahaha what the music didn't taste good for the heart? keep playing... who cares about what hateful hearts think....
Australia and America, different worlds
kids don't work in other industries in the Western World. its just an observation. of course to every rule there is exceptions.
yeh fair enough
for some people it might..
maybe the kids should work less... than 3 hours a day... less days...
i'm just saying that it should be fun for everyone.. and if other people want two year olds working for them... no that sounds friggen stupid. Hollywood is completely different.
yeh but is it fun for every one. or do you just think the ones that its not fun for is like sacrifice?
Does it matter? i dunno... I wouldn't want to work in a sweat shop all day as a kid, especially as a young child. I probably wouldn't want to work on a movie set either as a young child, not all the time day in and day out. just opinions
but we all know, hollywood is completely ridiculous, isn't it darling?
just too see if you put that into perspective did you recognise how ridiculous that sounded?
Yep. We should all have four year olds working for us mate. True.. this guy...
and i bet others bitch when some parents buy a family home with the money. there is nothing wrong with that.
i would say it could either be good or bad depending on the support around you and the crew you are working with.
like anything really.
i just think its a lot of pressure on children. even people judging parents on what they do with their pay checks.
its a bit much isn't it?
i'm just explaining why children should not have to work. and that also they are too young to say 'yes Mum and Dad I will take on a full time job. it could really help their family get a house or them for the future.
i'm just saying that some jobs are too big for young children to take on. sorry i'm trying to be clear here. Some jobs are too big for kids to take on especially for extended periods of time. yay?
i know the conditions are a lot better but what if they are like 5 or even 10 and are in a mind set that they work for a pay check all day every day. thats a lot. i would say that doesn't happen often. thats a lot of work for a kid. i'm not talking about teenagers who can handle a bit of work.
because it was proven that it was too dificult for children to work all day.
i thought so. <3
you should study the Industrial Revolution and child slave labour in England and see why they bought in a mandatory education system. Are there kids slaving for a pay check are there?
It sounds fine. I think they are saying so why can children not have arrangements like these in other fields? Only child actors have opportunity to shine professionally. Not children who are mechanically minded, scientific, artistic (sort of), good with languages. THAT is what ACTIONKAMEN WANTS PEOPLE TO THINK ABOUT. Why only the Child Actors and Actresses? Is it... IN FACT... to young.. as looking at other fields decision on the matter would show. Hollywood is granted a bit of silver light permission for the silver screen. What about children who speak multiple languages working in Intelligence? Or a horse rider in the Melbourne Cup at 14? ARE OTHER FEILDS NOT TRUSTED BUT HOLLYWOOD IS. I personally would QUESTION that. Actionkamen is right, they should be at school. Hollywood should only be an adventure for them. Not a full time job. Who do are other people taken for? Fools? Typical of society to do that in general.