MovieChat Forums > WhyNowTho > Replies
WhyNowTho's Replies
The IRS was targeting ALL political groups, both left and right, scrutinizing them to make sure they weren't for profit. You're such professional victims. You still believe the fallacy that only conservative groups were targeted. That's how much of an ill-informed moron you are.
And those that were trying to invoke the 25th amendments are lifelong Republicans, hardly leftists.
Satirical posts designed to make Trumpers look bad are INDISTINGUISHABLE from real Trumper posts that actually make them look bad.
And that's sad.
Even if all of these are real hoaxes -- the right wing still wins when it comes to committing actual hate crimes. That guy who drove his car into the crowd at Charlotesville. Killing that woman. Then the right-wing have the nerve to say she died of a heart attack. Tell me, dum-dums. Did all the people whose bones got crushed -- did their bones have heart attacks too.
And let's not forget the MAGA bomber.
And let's not forget the synagogue shooter, whose only bone of contention with Trump was that he wasn't racist enough.
But but but muh hoaxes! Hoaxes should be denounced, but they never physically hurt anyone. Unlike right-wingers.
I have to wonder. I really do. The degree of cognitive dissonance in somebody's fetid little mind. To predict the mainstream media will ignore a story [b]WHILE AT THE SAME TIME LINKING TO THE STORY BEING REPORTED IN THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA! [/b]
How the fuck do people like you function in society?
YOU picked the comment and hit reply on that comment and you proceeded to lie your ass off.
[i]"What woman lied about sexual assault because she didn't want a white man on the Supreme Court?!?
Did I miss something?
How do you know whether or not Dr Christine Blasey Ford was lying?"[/i]
It's funny how you now say you were only replying to the first sentence and not to the other two sentences that demand clarification and cite Dr. Ford by name.
HILARIOUS.
Did I miss something, the poster demands, after the first sentence. How do you know *DR. FORD* was lying, the poster follows up -- and this is the only part of the post that DEMANDS PROOF. So you're saying you completely ignored the follow-up questions in your reply: "She admitted to lying, so that's pretty strong proof."
You still insist you were replying only to this: "What woman lied about sexual assault because she didn't want a white man on the Supreme Court?!?" But but but - this question doesn't ask for proof. Just asks for a name.
[b]Answer me this, dummy. Which part of that question, which you now claim you were replying to, is asking for proof?[/b]
HILARIOUS.
The rest of your point is nonsensical, because ANY WOMAN can make baseless claims but only the credible Dr. Ford was vetted and allowed to testify. Whereas this other woman was not. Maybe she lied to cast doubt on Dr. Ford and make Ford's story less credible. And maybe it'll make it easier for some dum-dum on the internet to purposely conflate the two women, like you have done. In any case, moron, Dr. Ford testified -- if she lied, charge her with perjury. If she defamed, Justice Bretty Cocker should sue for defamation.
Something tells me neither is happening -- because both instances would involve thorough investigations into the accusations.
And Bretty boy doesn't want that.
As predicted -- YOU KEPT DIGGING. Now dig on further. Keep trying. You're funny to me.
Thought of something. A celebration of premarital sex -- this kind of party never happens. Why celebrate it when you can just do it? BUT what does happen a lot are baby showers - catered baby showers. With cakes.
Do these super Christian bakers ever ask if the parents are married before baking a baby shower cake? Then refuse to bake that cake if the parents are unwed? THIS. NEVER. HAPPENS.
It's all about discriminating against gays.
Then if they believe in the Bible so strongly, they should refuse to serve straight couples that have been having premarital sex and demand a certificate of virginity before baking the cake.
Pick and choose, pick and choose!
Thank you for walking into the trap.
We've now established you believe Liam Neeson. Does your belief extend to 5 seconds later when he says he realized the error of his ways and sought help and became a better man? Or do you only believe the part that makes him look bad, but not the part where he changes?
Uh, where is the evidence he ever went out hunting black men?
He didn't belittle the driver in anyway. He didn't even get that loud. We've all gotten madder and more irate at relatives and friends than De Niro got at his driver.
[quote]I just did asshole.[/quote]
Whose asshole did you do, asshole?
Your mother's?
Not surprised. He was likely a Republican in his college years.
I love when they say 79% of homicide victims are male, but then don't inform us what percentage of murderers are male.
It's 96%, by the way.
Poor, very corny response.