MovieChat Forums > MagneticMonopole > Replies
MagneticMonopole's Replies
It worked just fine. Even actual comic books have used non-linear narrative so it isn't as if Nolan using it here was anything remarkable or unusual for the genre.
MRA's are the most embarrassing, pathetic losers on the face of the earth.
TLJ is one of the best reviewed Star Wars films ever made and has brought in 1.269 billion dollars with more to come. It is a smashing success by every metric that matters. (Sorry, but losers like you just don't matter now and never will.)
It is simply a fact that butthurt losers have bragged about using social media to get fellow butthurt losers to artificially raise the number of online bad reviews and scores for the film.
It is also a fact that even the people who run these sites know the numbers are not reliable measures of audience reaction, and say so.
As for your bizarre thing about China, that's you arguing with the voices in your head.
Case close, deluded nitwit.
"And he used for that purpose 868 recent (!) votes. So everything at his method is fine. "
No, idiot, that's not fine.
A. Given that butthurt losers have bragged about organizing attacks on the ratings, the entire pool of self-selected ratings by users who could have multiple accounts and who don't even have to have seen the movie is contaminated nonsense. Even the former chief editor of Rotten Tomatoes has said that he does not trust the site's ratings as an accurate measure of audience reaction. Case closed.
B. Given A and common sense, a sample that is limited to only recent reviews is doubly garbage data. That's why it has to be random. That's like doing a political poll that only samples one county in a state.
Or course, since you are a deluded nutcase with no concept of how to understand objective reality, this will all sail right over your head.
"A sample of 868 reviewers is way more then you get even at election forecasts. "
Excuse me, pumpkin, but samples need to be randomized if they are to be valid at all. See what I'm talking about? You deluded nutcases have no conception of what evidence looks like.
And what bizarre random spasm of neurons firing in your brain makes you think that anything about this topic has to do with the alt-right's obsession with gender and race issues? You really need to step on your medication.
I can understand why you want to change the topic since you aren't doing very well, but I'm not playing that game.
" Eli made a lot of evidence. "
Apparently, like Eli, you have no sane or rational conception of what "evidence" actually is.
"You dismissed all the evidence that I presented because it is circumstantial."
No, puppy, I rejected your "evidence" because it was complete garbage. You took a non-random sample of just a fraction of the scores--garbage data--and tried to draw a conclusion from that data that no rational person would draw. And that's all you have to support your case: nothing.
"sing your precious logic, that only leaves the possibility that they want hide reviews from users to hide how they calculate aggregate scores. "
That's clown logic there, not the real thing. The fact remains that you have absolutely no evidence to back up your conspiracy theory. You have about the same relationship to objective reality as a creationist or Trump spokesperson.
Your failure to back up the BS you keep typing has been duly noted.
Again, you have no ability to reason from evidence to a rationally justifiable conclusion. The fact that you can't see the vast, vast majority of the reviews completely invalidates your argument and makes you look like a paranoid idiot.
"Why do you speak like a 14 year old trying to sound smart?"
That's your job, cupcake.
"Took me about 30 seconds to find evidence of industry collusion:"
None of which supports your case that there are ratings manipulations of the sort that your paranoid opening post suggested. You obviously have no idea how to reason from facts to justified conclusions.
Everyone knows that the internet is filled with fake reviews and discussion posts by paid shills. But there is zero evidence that studios collude with movie sites to prevent idiotic losers from writing stupid reviews or giving unjustifiable low scores just because they are butthurt babies.
In fact, the only evidence I saw suggested it was butthurt fanboys doing the manipulation.
Believe whatever you want. I say he had it coming, it is old news, and there is jack shit you can do about it a year after it happened. Grow up, get over it, and go back to your racist whining about black people getting parts in movies.
I only insult morons who make idiotic posts. Unfortunately, there are a lot of you around this particular site.
I note with great satisfaction and no surprise that you have offered zero evidence and no logic or reason to defend your ridiculous conspiracy theory. Typical.
Actually, in context, it did. Her reaction was on the more extreme end of acceptable responses, but it was legit.
Sorry that you are such a special snowflake that you need to whine about this old story on the internet so long after it was actually newsworthy. Says something about the state of your life, doesn't it?
He had it coming.
For you to call a movie the worst of all time is basically to suggest it might be one of the best. It's the highest compliment one can get.