MovieChat Forums > MagneticMonopole > Replies
MagneticMonopole's Replies
"good points and perspective. My goal claiming moral balance was how many peeps were deriding him waking her up and ignoring the total, big picture: EVERYONE was going to die, and they saved that chunk of civilization."
Still doesn't erase that what he did was morally reprehensible, though. It's a good thing for everyone on the ship that he was weak the moment he woke Aurora up, but it is just a coincidence (and very lazy script writing) that this ended up benefiting everyone in the end.
Please take your medication. You really need it.
I had no problem at all with the performance. Most rational people didn't.
Ha! I was getting that vibe, too! This troll is an idiot with some issues, that's for sure.
The only reason people like you make posts like this is because you are worthless pieces of sexist human excrement.
Another grunt. Got it.
If evidence and rational thought are things you value, consider the following:
1. His MO was to approach vulnerable young actresses who needed a break. The one and only time she worked for him, she had already received an Oscar nomination and had secured two high profile roles in two popular franchises, including a lead role that was among the most sought after in the business at the time. She needed nothing from him.
2. She got the role from a Skype audition that David Russell loved. He was the one who told Weinstein to hire her. This is will known.
3. Look at her personality. She is not a shrinking violet, but a strong minded, outspoken alpha who has been very up front about her feminism. She would not have tolerated abuse, especially when you consider that she was already becoming a powerful star the one time she worked with him.
4. She has said there was no abuse directed at her. Being one of the biggest movie stars in the world, she has no reason to lie.
Basically, when you look at the facts, your belief in a conspiracy theory to hide an affair or abuse makes zero sense. Do you have any evidence to contradict this judgement?
Can you articulate some more or are you basically going to post the equivalent of grunts?
Great post, Frogarama. Sums the situation up perfectly.
Aw, poor little alt-Right snowflake is so butthurt. How cute.
"I have not seen every Star trek, I have seen some of it, as far as I am aware sexual relationships were at the minimum and definitely not the focus of the show."
It's not the focus of the show. You're just being silly and hysterical.
"To even have to show homosexual relationship is shocking. . ."
Only to cultural neanderthals whose minds are stuck in the past.
i agree that she was really good in this, but I don't think the movie served her character very well. It's kind of like the filmmakers went out of their way to make her seem like a bitch, when in fact in her arguments with Ford her character almost always had a legitimate point that he should have listened to. Hope she comes back though it seems unlikely.
Acting ability has a subjective element and a popularity contest element, but it also has an objective element. When critical response aligns with awards volumes (including most importantly, awards put out by critics associations) and you have an aggregate consensus that someone is an extremely talented actor, that’s objective evidence that they are, in fact, extremely talented.
If you think this can be purchased, you are quite assuredly the one who is naïve, here.
Good luck articulating a single thing about my post that was naive.
Bias in your post and countless others like it means nothing more than this:
"I alone have the ability to objectively assess reality, so if anyone thinks differently, it can only be because THEY have a bias."
""Deserved"? Hmmm not all.
There is some biases."
Yeah--your biases.
It's so easy to make these snap judgments when you aren't in the position she and the other girls found themselves in, wanting to be actresses and thinking this is just how the business is run.
I don't think there's a chance in hell that would happen. At most they'll continue to deal with the issue of his mind being corrupted by association with the killers he's been interviewing, but it will never go as far as him becoming one himself.
More BS, no evidence. Gossip sites, tarot reading pundits: you have no concept of what a reliable source is.
How scumbags like you live with yourselves will always be a mystery to me. I guess that's because I only hang out with rational people who actually have a moral center, so creatures like you will always be an anomaly to me.
One of the Biblical plagues.