MovieChat Forums > aimc > Replies
aimc's Replies
I first saw Craig in a movie in which he was a professor. So seeing him as Bond was weird. But a few movies later, his bird-like face is getting less distracting and I guess he's got a good demeanor as Bond.
Cavill might be able to pull it off. He's got more of the typical Brit grille than Craig, crooked.
What about the broker chick?
When you own a business, sure. To varying degrees.
He was the outsourced facetime so that JPG didn't have to talk to Gail in person.
At least in the movie, he found III in a somewhat timely manner.
Not about him, who cares what it took for him, it's about the audience. We see him play the same fast-talking caricature every time. It detracts from the authenticity because Chace has been molded into a Wahlberg rather than the other way around.
Not really, only cost me 3.4GB down and 6.8GB up since I'm fair.
Did he ever donate anything to the guy he blinded when he was younger though.
According to the movie, JPG barely knew JPGII.
Putting all his energy into the company -> company does great.
Putting 0 energy into his kid -> kid is fvcked up.
Probably wasn't too surprising; he just didn't really care.
I've only seen Plummer in old guy roles so he fits better for me and he expressed JPG's tendencies perfectly. So, perfect choice for the movie IMHO.
While I would've picked Plummer for this role, I thought canning Spacey as separate matter was a douche move for the suits to no particular purpose. Maybe drop him from future consideration but when the movie was already done?
I saw both of her's and it was too long ago to remember but you really can't go wrong putting a tank top on Jolie and having her kick a55 in exotic locales. Will probably rewatch.
Probably nearly everyone here is from IMDB.
I tried to look up the info but can't find why Nate was acquitted?
The stories all say he banged the accuser while she was unconscious/drunk, as did his friend.
Both men eventually were found not guilty. News writers seem to neglect the obvious question of w-h-y?
I'm not sure I followed the plot or if it made any sense (private company with that amount of capability) but the presence of Rachel McAdams is sufficient to have enjoyed watching it.
depends if she has a chopper
Banished from the industry and 2 bullets to the head... GL with your wish.
Wonder why they even released the news that way. Conspiracy fodder.
Your life sounds so interesting, how interesting it must be to be so dense! You should write an autobio.
You proved to yourself that you don't know what you're talking about, maybe watch the movie before going to a forum about the movie?
I see what you did there.
No dude she rescued him from the sinking plane, in case you arrived 30min late to the movie.