I don't know if I would look for some deep significance in the choice of Russell as narrator. It might simply be that QT felt bad about his small role in the movie and compensated Russell with the narrator job..
---
That strikes me as a good possibility.
QT used these narrators in these two films:
Inglorous Basterds: Samuel L. Jackson in two segments: telling the backstory of the serial killer Nazi killer (Hugo Schtiglitz); and giving us background on how old fashioned nitrate film burns(with images from an old 30's Alfred Hitchcock movie to illustrate -- yes, QT meets Hitchcock, right here.)
The Hateful Eight: QT himself. Again, two segments. Once after the intermission(laying out the poisoning of the coffee) and once later on when some bodies are thrown into the well.
So it looks like this time, QT felt that neither Jackson nor QT would "fit" quite right. Why not use Russell who -- by the way -- has a great, grumbly, crisp voice(its part of the hidden reason for his stardom, and it usually sounds a little pissed off.) Russell is a character in the story, and as such, a Hollywood colleague of Leo and Brad.
reply
share