3.5 hours of white bashing


The Osage people weren't good people either. Will the movie cover that? I doubt it.

reply

Only 3.5 hours? To make it fair, it should be thousand of years long.

reply

Did you steal that line from Spike Lee who said 12 years a slave should have been 12 years long?
His line at least would make sense, cause the events in that movie lasted 12 years.

But the events in this movie dont last a thousand years so its weird that you think it should have lasted that long.

reply

White people still rule America, don't they? Indian reservations are still a thing, aren't they?

reply

What part of "...the events in this movie" did you not understand?

reply

If you think this movie is about 4 or 6 crimes, you missed the point, bro.

reply

How long should Schindlers List have lasted?

reply

80 years. Do you not watch the news?!

reply

Bro, you think the Jews have been oppressed only 80 years. Dude, seriously.

reply

What's the starting point of Schindler's List?

reply

What do you mean by starting point?

reply

Where is your film about how bad the natives are? Sitting on your hands impresses no one.

reply

Dumbest comment you can make when someone critisizes a movie is to go: How about you go and make a movie then. :D

reply

Not at all. In this case the OP had already decided that his prejudice could be an adequate substitute for an actual review and commentary.

Is it too much to ask that a person actually watch a film before criticizing it instead of opening their mouth prior to release?

reply

So instead of saying you shouldnt criticize a movie before seeing it you told him to make a movie about how bad the natives are? Okay, i guess. He was right though.

reply

Yes, why can't he produce a film about how bad some people are?

reply

Have you ever critisized a movie? Why did you do that, instead of making your own?

reply

I do make my own. They are not worthy of mass distribution though.

reply

So you're sticking to the idiotic statement that no one should critisize a film unless they make their own?

reply

No where did I claim that "no one should criticize a film unless they make their own". But if you need to make that false claim to win an argument, then I guess your argument is worthless.

reply

A quote from you: "Where is your film about how bad the natives are? Sitting on your hands impresses no one."

Why didnt you let this person critisize a film without you demanding that he made one?

reply

That quote must mean something completely different to you than to me.

I can make any demands I want; no one is under any obligation to fulfill them.

reply

So what does that quote mean to you?

Of course you can make any demands you want, but that just makes you seem like a little brat.

reply

I was at a party recently and this movie was brought up as an example of how bad America is.

I let it drop, because I didnt want to ruin the party, but wow. What an asshole thing to say.

BUT, imo, likely hte intent behind making the movie.

Woke hollywood hates America and white people.

reply

What it means to me is that he whines and does nothing else constructive. If someone like you think I'm a little brat, I can live with it.

reply

You mean he doesnt do anything constructive except comment on a message board? Guess what you're doing here?

reply

Res flash: the movie bashes the white criminals, not the white race.

reply

There was more than just white-bashing.

There's also an anti-vaccination message in there, just in case you didn't get it.

reply

[deleted]

Rather watch classic "F-Troop" episodes. Where everybody got along.

reply

Not really. Its a movie about a group of white people committing crimes and then another group of white people catching them.

reply

It was based on a true story though.

I enjoyed it but it certainly pushed my limits for a damn long movie!

The cast, cinematography and set designs were great, I really liked it and I’m an ‘evil white man’ 🤓

reply