WHACK!!!!!!


HOLY CRAP! This lame piece of *beep* makes VINYL look like Saturday Night Fever.

I could not believe my eyes (or ears). This is like some kind of ghetto After School Special. And a LOUSY one to boot! I don't know what Baz was smoking when he wrote this mess but it was of the poorest quality. Just like The Get Down. I grew up in the South Bronx and was there during the time in which this series is set. (NEVER saw piles of constantly smoldering rubble.) Not only does this idiot come NOWHERE NEAR telling the story of how rap and hip-hop started to become more mainstream, but the lame story that he does tell isn't even told well!

• LOUSY Acting

• LAME Dialogue

• CRAPPY Visuals (The SAME stock footage shown over and OVER!)

And it LOOKS like a tv show made with one tenth of the actual budget. The opening credits of Different Strokes looks better than most of this mess.

I was actually shocked at how bad this crapfest was. SHAME on you, Luhrmann! Hopefully one day a talented film maker will make a GOOD movie/show about the story of hip-hop.

reply

Bad troll, nothing to see here, move along.

reply

Hello, IDIOT. Sorry that you can't deal with the HONEST opinion of a NON-sheep like yourself. Btw... are you on the NETFLIX payroll or Mr. Luhrman's???

reply

2/10, too obvious, try harder little troll :)

reply

A shame when dolts like you can't accept the opinions of those with MUCH better taste than you. LMFAO

reply

Learned a long time ago, when someone resorts to the "are you on the payroll of ....?" routine, they actually don't know what else to say; their opinion is a blank, an empty, meaningless gesture, without rhyme or reason to back it up. Disagree with their opinion and they're lost cause they don't know what they're talking about. Discussion will always be impossible because discussion never was the point. Folks like ml-125 say stuff to provoke. They say provocative things, then sit back and enjoy the responses. WHACK !!!! is only half the story; "whacked out" fills in the blank: the space where a real opinion can be found when someone actually has something to say.

THE GET DOWN, according to ml-125, has LOUSY acting?
Well, if this is lousy acting, I wonder what ml-125 considers good?

Brilliant acting is more like it.

Jimmy Smits gives the performance of his life; if this was a movie, he'd be nominated for an Academy Award. The lead, Justice Smith, plays a boy becoming a man before our very eyes. He's morally complex and emotionally complicated. On top of which, he's called on to dance, rap, and sing.

The storytelling style does not attempt the kind of documentary realism that ml-125 says is missing. This is not a show about realistic street scenes. It's about the spirit of an era, 1977; it's about the merging of social and creative forces giving new form to old sounds, rearranged and reborn. In the process, this burst of vital creativity pushed against all those established rhythms of the status quo until the immutable social barriers keeping people, races, cultures apart, crumbled, turning the beat around for all time. Each of the characters represent an aspect of the era, and it's to the film makers' credit that we can relate to their hopes and dreams, their experiences, fears, conflicts, loves, but most of all to whatever it is that brings them to their own particular music, as human beings. (The acting is, across the board, excellent.)

What's really remarkable is how THE GET DOWN seems at first to be a drama but actually moves and plays like a musical, with its songs and dance numbers, not on top of the action, but emerging from within it. This is a world of sound, music, and motion; those things -- demonstrated even in the way the show is presented, edited -- are a reflection of that world's truth.

This is a remarkable show.

reply

Learned a long time ago, when someone resorts to the "are you on the payroll of ....?" routine, they actually don't know what else to say; their opinion is a blank, an empty, meaningless gesture, without rhyme or reason to back it up. Disagree with their opinion and they're lost cause they don't know what they're talking about. Discussion will always be impossible because discussion never was the point. Folks like ml-125 say stuff to provoke. They say provocative things, then sit back and enjoy the responses. WHACK !!!! is only half the story; "whacked out" fills in the blank: the space where a real opinion can be found when someone actually has something to say.

THE GET DOWN, according to ml-125, has LOUSY acting?
Well, if this is lousy acting, I wonder what ml-125 considers good?

Brilliant acting is more like it.

Jimmy Smits gives the performance of his life; if this was a movie, he'd be nominated for an Academy Award. The lead, Justice Smith, plays a boy becoming a man before our very eyes. He's morally complex and emotionally complicated. On top of which, he's called on to dance, rap, and sing.

The storytelling style does not attempt the kind of documentary realism that ml-125 says is missing. This is not a show about realistic street scenes. It's about the spirit of an era, 1977; it's about the merging of social and creative forces giving new form to old sounds, rearranged and reborn. In the process, this burst of vital creativity pushed against all those established rhythms of the status quo until the immutable social barriers keeping people, races, cultures apart, crumbled, turning the beat around for all time. Each of the characters represent an aspect of the era, and it's to the film makers' credit that we can relate to their hopes and dreams, their experiences, fears, conflicts, loves, but most of all to whatever it is that brings them to their own particular music, as human beings. (The acting is, across the board, excellent.)

What's really remarkable is how THE GET DOWN seems at first to be a drama but actually moves and plays like a musical, with its songs and dance numbers, not on top of the action, but emerging from within it. This is a world of sound, music, and motion; those things -- demonstrated even in the way the show is presented, edited -- are a reflection of that world's truth.

This is a remarkable show.




I don't do signatures. ^_^

reply

Learned a long time ago, when someone resorts to the "are you on the payroll of ....?" routine, they actually don't know what else to say; their opinion is a blank, an empty, meaningless gesture, without rhyme or reason to back it up. Disagree with their opinion and they're lost cause they don't know what they're talking about. Discussion will always be impossible because discussion never was the point. Folks like ml-125 say stuff to provoke. They say provocative things, then sit back and enjoy the responses. WHACK !!!! is only half the story; "whacked out" fills in the blank: the space where a real opinion can be found when someone actually has something to say.

THE GET DOWN, according to ml-125, has LOUSY acting?
Well, if this is lousy acting, I wonder what ml-125 considers good?

Brilliant acting is more like it.

Jimmy Smits gives the performance of his life; if this was a movie, he'd be nominated for an Academy Award. The lead, Justice Smith, plays a boy becoming a man before our very eyes. He's morally complex and emotionally complicated. On top of which, he's called on to dance, rap, and sing.

The storytelling style does not attempt the kind of documentary realism that ml-125 says is missing. This is not a show about realistic street scenes. It's about the spirit of an era, 1977; it's about the merging of social and creative forces giving new form to old sounds, rearranged and reborn. In the process, this burst of vital creativity pushed against all those established rhythms of the status quo until the immutable social barriers keeping people, races, cultures apart, crumbled, turning the beat around for all time. Each of the characters represent an aspect of the era, and it's to the film makers' credit that we can relate to their hopes and dreams, their experiences, fears, conflicts, loves, but most of all to whatever it is that brings them to their own particular music, as human beings. (The acting is, across the board, excellent.)

What's really remarkable is how THE GET DOWN seems at first to be a drama but actually moves and plays like a musical, with its songs and dance numbers, not on top of the action, but emerging from within it. This is a world of sound, music, and motion; those things -- demonstrated even in the way the show is presented, edited -- are a reflection of that world's truth.

This is a remarkable show.


Sounds like you're on the payroll of the producers! There are a few other posters on this board who also go into too much detail and provide too much commentary on the show..

reply

Well, like I said, when the only comment someone makes is, "You must be working for the producers," it's a sign they really don't have any other reason to disagree. The other sure sign is when someone brings up how much has been written. You, MiketheMechanic, made both comments in as many sentences.

The show is brilliant. I've said why I think it's so. Will add, "A shame when dolts like you can't accept the opinions of those with MUCH better taste than you."

reply

Well, like I said, when the only comment someone makes is, "You must be working for the producers," it's a sign they really don't have any other reason to disagree. The other sure sign is when someone brings up how much has been written.


Please don't make it up as you go along. If you're a fan of the show, fine, it's not a bad show and can be quite enjoyable for what it is. Brilliant isn't a word that I'd use to describe it.

But you sound and write like you're more than just a casual fan, something that is odd for a show that's only produced and aired six episodes.

The following sounds like a press release:

This is not a show about realistic street scenes. It's about the spirit of an era, 1977; it's about the merging of social and creative forces giving new form to old sounds, rearranged and reborn. In the process, this burst of vital creativity pushed against all those established rhythms of the status quo until the immutable social barriers keeping people, races, cultures apart, crumbled, turning the beat around for all time. Each of the characters represent an aspect of the era, and it's to the film makers' credit that we can relate to their hopes and dreams, their experiences, fears, conflicts, loves, but most of all to whatever it is that brings them to their own particular music, as human beings.




Also, please note that a true fan (or an employee who should know better) will realize and respect the opinions of others without having to resort to insults as you did.


reply

https://www.rottentomatoes.com/tv/the_get_down/s01/reviews/?type=top_critics

That's right troll, a true fan would respect and not call those who disagree with them "... an employee who should know better."

A true fan would have seen other movies and would have a point of reference for the paragraph copied above in the works of the creator and executive producer of the series. With that point of reference in mind, what I have written, and has been copied, would not seem so strange to you.

A true fan would be able to see what's on the screen and not simply what they believe is not.

A true fan would have a working knowledge of the way one writes critical pieces, reads reviews, think-pieces, and would be able to respond specifically to ideas the writer has expressed, instead of merely calling the way others perceive work "press releases."

A true fan would have pointed out what they disagree with in the piece you've copied. They would also have explained why the points of disagreement exist, instead of merely calling it a Press Release; which means, in my view, you have no objections to the content of the piece. Rather, in true troll fashion, you dislike the whole idea that anyone would disagree with you.

Yes, a real fan would not HAVE to resort to insult because the show itself would fill them with enthusiasm and a myriad of ideas to express. But when I responses to what I write that are condescending, that do not actually address the points I bring up, and cast aspersions on the honesty of my opinion, I WILL respond in kind. I will resort to insult.

I don't know what you mean by "a casual fan," but if you're an example, you're right. I am more than a casual fan.

Take a look at the review on rotten tomatoes.com, the link I've included above. Those articles are not written by "real fans," nor are they on the payroll of Netflix. Those pieces are written by reviewers. You will note that their articles express likes and dislikes; but more importantly, they all tell you WHY they like or dislike the show. You see, to do that, one goes into detail. Take a look. You might pick up something you can use instead of the tired, old "on the payroll" line. You might actually get the idea to talk about the show a little. Which is what I do in the part you copied.

reply

You're protesting way too much! Who's got time to read all that yang yang? 

Bottom line, if you're going to get this wordy every time someone disagrees with you, consider changing shows. Maybe there's an opening in Downton Abbey?

reply

Bottom line, if there are too many words for you to read, don't.

Not that you can read. Calling what I wrote "all that yang yang" and saying I'm "protesting" does not make a whole lot of sense.

I'm not lodging, organizing, or stating a protest. I'm taking what you wrote at face value and responding to it.

I happen to like DOWNTOWN ABBEY. I happen to like all kinds of show and movies and books. And guess what? I can tell you WHY I like them. If I write something on a message board I figure it should be more than just my own value judgement because, who cares about that? A judgment is the least interesting thing about any comment. It's the reasons that bring me to the judgement that will inform others. If I don't share those reasons - just share the judgement - I'm just being pompous, as if my yea or nay actually matters.

Oh my, too many words! This protest, or rather, statement. I know you won't get this far and if you do who knows what show it'll inspire you to suggest next?

reply

Bottom line, if there are too many words for you to read, don't.


You don't have to worry about that!!

Not that you can read. Calling what I wrote "all that yang yang" and saying I'm "protesting" does not make a whole lot of sense.


Being able to read and being selective in what one chooses to read are two different things.

I'm not lodging, organizing, or stating a protest. I'm taking what you wrote at face value and responding to it.

I happen to like DOWNTOWN ABBEY. I happen to like all kinds of show and movies and books. And guess what? I can tell you WHY I like them. If I write something on a message board I figure it should be more than just my own value judgement because, who cares about that? A judgment is the least interesting thing about any comment. It's the reasons that bring me to the judgement that will inform others. If I don't share those reasons - just share the judgement - I'm just being pompous, as if my yea or nay actually matters.


I'm glad to see that you enjoy Downton Abbey. At the end of the day though, again I state that if you post a comment, judgment, whatever....on a message board, expect to hear opposing positions and don't be so quick to get so defensive.

I've a feeling you're better than that, you're just not showing it.

Oh my, too many words! This protest, or rather, statement. I know you won't get this far and if you do who knows what show it'll inspire you to suggest next?


If The Get Down can inspire you to be such a wordsmith and if available I wait to hear with bated breath your previously penned review of the classic tv series M*A*S*H.

reply

Spoiler Alert: You're the idiot

reply

Multiple people, including myself, have posted damn near the same complaints. Stop dismissing this stuff as trolling. This show isn't that good at all. It has glaring faults. It pretty clear, the majority of people arent loving this and many of us wanted it to be better.

reply

the show was written with the hip hop fan in mind. If you didn't grow up a fan of hip hop music or was never in love with the culture, I wouldn't expect you to like this, so I understand. I'm not into Sparticus type shows, but I don't think they're horrible because I don't like them, it's just not my thing. I grew up in the 80s before hip hop was mainstream and I've seen all of the hip hop documentaries and movies from that era so I love this series.

reply

You don't mention what you think those faults are, or tell us who this majority is you're talking about. The reviews I've read are all good.

The guy who started this thread is a troll. His response to opposition is, My taste is better than yours; if you like the show, you're a dolt. Well, that's troll talk, for sure.

reply

@raymondjackso25


This IS a good show, and practically EVERY show has faults/flaws to some extent. Like I said in another post, certain people (like yourself) seems to be disappointed that the show dosen't live up to THEIR version of whatever the heck they wanted a show about the history of hip-hop to look like. Exactly what don't you like about the show? It's not perfect, but it kept me hooked and entertained almost from the get-go, and I've seen all 6 episodes. As someone who grew up listening to hip-hop in the early '80s---before it became completely mainstream, I enjoyed the show, and frankly, I feel that it's past time for a show like this to encapsulate the history of such a huge cultural movement like hip-hop---it's been around more than long enough (close to 40 years) to have one. Practically every other musical genre ever invented has one, why not hip-hop?

Thing is, even though the show has some flaws, but the positives (interesting characters with depth, a remarkable '70s cinematic look, great music with specific disco classics that I recall growing up listening to, the sheer fun and joy of seeing these young teenagers create their own unique order out of the dark and gritty chaos of the terrible environment they lived in, great acting by Justice Smith as Zeke and Jimmy Smits in particular) definitely outweighted the few negatives the show has.

reply

The show is entertaining (enough) but I wouldn't call it a good show. It's in its infancy and too all over the place and, if there is a second season hopefully it will find itself.

If you really, really enjoy the show as much as it seems, if I were you I'd try to spend less time trying to defend it and more time trying to promote it.

reply

I'm doing both,lol----telling people about it and everything. And,yes, it is a good show, even if you don't like it.

reply

Hahaha thirsty troll

reply

Hahaha Idiot troll chasing moron with NO taste.

reply

Everyone has their own opinion and yours just happens to be far from a popular one.

reply

I honestly don't care for negative opinions cause I find the show to be fantastically produced. It's not perfect but it's good. Don't like it, you'll find something else you like. Meanwhile I'm gonna go watch the show for the 3rd time. Bye.

reply

I was really disappointed, too.

It is poorly acted, the writing is ... chaotic? Many of the scenes are a bit cheesy, and their is too much contemporary influence on speech and action for my taste.

Not one of Netflix's better offerings.

reply

I appreciate that you don't like the show, but ghetto After School Special is a little offensive. I don't think it is a perfect show, especially if you are not a fan of Lurhman's style, which I really don't (never thought Moulin Rouge or Gatsby were all that great), but the show is a lot of fun and does a fine job of using an under mined cultural moment and context to tell a really solid coming of age story. I have read some posts here and other places that nitpick on specifics (like including an Atari 2600 a couple of months before it actually came out in '77), but the main points of the origins of hip hop are all there: the originators (Flash and Kool Herc), the styles, the bombed out Bronx, the visual elements (graffiti, b-boys, the frenetic pace of NYC). Is it a "smart" show like Breaking Bad or The Wire? Of course not! But it is fun, with interesting characters (except for Jayden Smith's character [I never liked his dad and he is well on that road]), and a family friendly narrative that can inspire more respect in what is arguably the most important cultural movement since the advent of rock and roll.

reply

Great post simply for the Diff'rent Strokes opening credit comparison.. gold!

reply

I was feeling more of a Welcome Back Kotter vibe... But I suppose 70's New York feels a little different to everyone...

reply

I did find it more entertaining to watch than Vinyl but I will admit it suffers from many of the same faults.

reply

Yep. People keep messing up series that really had the potential to be incredible. I don't like all these famous kid cameos too. Jayden Smith, Mick Jagger junior - horrendous "actors".

reply

Jaden Smith only plays a supporting role in this---don't know why people are still complaining about him---he's not even the star of the show to begin with.

reply

Because in both cases I mention it's a case of "oh that's Will Smith's son, that's Mick Jagger's son." Why cast them if not for parental influence? Would either have got the part based on acting ability? Unlikely. I'll say no more because I've only watched two and a half episodes. Just wanted to vent disappointment that it was the one series I'd anticipated the most this year and I'd give it 6/10 if I was being generous.

reply