MovieChat Forums > The Hateful Eight (2015) Discussion > So Samuel L. Jackson was gay in this one...

So Samuel L. Jackson was gay in this one?


Weird that they made him gay in this one. That was the one part that was a little too strange for me. Maybe I'm just not used to seeing him like that. He's a great actor, but I didn't see it.

GQ

reply

Please stop embarrassing yourself.

reply

I'll never be embarrassed to say Samuel L. Jackson is a great actor.

GQ

reply

Pretty sure you knew what I meant, genius. The fact that you thought enough of this borderline homophobic rubbish of a post that it deserved its own topic, after spewing the same ignorance in another topic says a lot. If his character *was* gay, that's just your interpretation. Most people on here would like to believe that flashback never even actually happened. If it did, he was clearly demeaning and torturing the son of a man he had every reason to hate. Why not just call the son gay while you're at it and tell us all how you didn't much care for that either. Are straight men in prison who engage, or are forced to engage, in homosexual activity gay? I realize that you're just trolling, but it's ignorant and starting to become a bit pathetic. I'm under the impression that you didn't care for the film, based on some of your other posts, and now you're just starting to make *beep* up for the hell of it, either to try and get other like minded ignorant individuals on your side, or to get a rise out of those of us who actually enjoyed this film. Grow up.

reply

Hold on. You mean to tell me he's not supposed to be gay in this? So he has another man perform fellatio on him for some other reason?

I never said there was anything wrong with it. I said I didn't think it worked for his character.

GQ

reply

Hold on. So you're telling me that you're not an ignorant, homophobic, trolling p.o.s.? So you make posts like this for some other reason?

There is something wrong with it, and I don't think you're doing anything to further advance the discussion on this message board or the human race.

reply

Hold on. So you're telling me that you're not an ignorant, homophobic, trolling p.o.s.? So you make posts like this for some other reason?

Wait a minute. Are you saying on this board that not only does everyone have to believe that one man sucking another man off is a wonderful thing as you seem to be think, but that we also can't be curious if a certain character is gay? Your bully tactics won't work on here you silly little deviant.

reply

I don't think you understand what he's saying.... He's not saying getting a blowjob from a man is a wonderful thing. He's saying that it wasn't a story about a gay man. It was he story of a man demeaning another man and that's all.

reply

You're wrong. The Major was enjoying it too much. It's not demeaning unless other people know about it. If he hadn't met the father, no one would have known what happened.

reply

I don't have a problem with gays. Live and let live, do whatever they do. The problem is when they try to SHOVE their lifestyle in your FACE . You go to see a violent western, you're not going to have two men having oral sex SHOVED in your face! After some googling, I'm just now realizing that Tarantino does this in a lot of his films. He's either straight up gay, switch hitting, or has some...odd...fetishes. I'll gladly watch two hot chicks going at it ! Two...men? Uh...no.

Amazing Fact: Thor 2 outgrossed Winter Soldier in 72% of the territories, and sold more Blu rays.

reply

You're pathetic and I hope you get AIDS off a toilet seat and succumb to the illness slowly.







who's scruffy lookin?

reply

Most people on here would like to believe that flashback never even actually happened. If it did, he was clearly demeaning and torturing the son of a man he had every reason to hate. Why not just call the son gay while you're at it.

The son was clearly sexually assaulted. That's pretty messed up to compare it to a consensual act.

GQ

reply

I'm done with you. You "win". Congratulations.

reply

LOL

Yes, nobody plays Samuel L. Jackson like Samuel L. Jackson ...

This year's award for best Samuel L. Jackson impression goes to ...........

Samuel L. Jackson!


reply

Please stop embarrassing yourself.
That's comically ironic, given that you unwittingly embarrassed yourself by using the word "homophobic", which uses the slur "homo" as a root word:
ho·mo
offensive
noun: homo; plural noun: homos

1. a homosexual man.
You + an idiot = 2 idiots.

I don't dance, tell jokes or wear my pants too tight, but I do know about a thousand songs.

reply

Idiot.

"Digital Filmmaking" is an oxymoron #film #realfilm #Super8mm #16mm #35mm #70mm #filmforever

reply

OBVIOUS TROLL IS OBVIOUS

reply

Assuming he actually did that, he's catching, not pitching. He made the guy do that to humiliate him. An evil thing to do (even if the guy was asking for it), but not inherently gay. If he had somebody he liked do that, when he had the option of a female doing it instead, THAT would be gay.

reply

You have your catching and pitching mixed up. Just thought you should know so it doesn't get you into trouble down the road. O.O

reply

I was misremembering a line of dialogue from The Sopranos.

If it wasn't for cable, I woudln't know any of this stuff, so don't worry.

reply

He was in the middle of nowhere, there was no one there to see it. Sure showed that guy!

No, it seems he did it for his own pleasure, to get his rocks off.

GQ

reply

GradyQ, if this is at all a serious post....it had nothing to do with him being gay. He did it because it was the most degrading thing he could do to his enemy at the time. He didn't get sexual satisfaction out of it.

Thats if the flashback actually even took place. Jackson could've fabricated that whole story just to get the general so enraged that he attempts to shoot him enabling SLJ to kill him.

reply

I'd bet on it being a fabrication. Warren shows himself to be a manipulator at multiple points in the movie.

reply

This troll is obsessed with SLJ's peen and keeps bringing the subject up every chance he gets. If you don't feed the trolls, they usually go away.

🐈 High Their!

reply

He did say he never went in for a woman regular.

imperial-klutz77 IS A C_NT. Go to makingstarwarsrumorssuck.boardhost.com

reply

SLJ was not gay in this. That story was most likely just a lie to get the general to draw his weapon on him. Even if it was a true story, still doesn't make him gay. It was just more of a demeaning act of torture..

reply

Where I'm from, if you like to have men give you oral, you're gay.

Otherwise, isn't he demeaning himself too if he engages in an act he doesn't enjoy?

If he wanted to torture the guy he could have pulled out his fingernails one by one.

I assume he had to get an erection to perform the act. He did have a big smile on his face when it was going down too.

All roads are leading to "gay" here.

GQ

reply

What a troll you are



"Digital Filmmaking" is an oxymoron #film #realfilm #Super8mm #16mm #35mm #70mm #filmforever

reply

Dude, you've been pwned and humiliated time and again on these boards. First you try to play the "film purist" card, but you were met with people who knew much more about the subject than you apparently do. Then it was discovered you went to film school then tried your hand in Hollywood but crapped out. So you left town a failure, tail between your legs. Yes, let's all listen to you about film. Or cinema, as you like to call it. You're an expert.

Now you've stooped to name calling and insults, adding nothing to the conversation. The troll here is you. Go back to working for your non-profit that is probably subsidized by tax payers. You're safe there. Here you might be met with differing opinions, which I know you can't stand.

GQ

reply

This post, particularly the second paragraph is hypocritical as all hell. This thread is CLEARLY meant to troll people and isn't adding anything remotely intelligent or meaningful to the conversation about the film at all. So, I guess it's apiece of 90% of the other threads on here. Congratulations, you are clearly a bitter and lonely little man, with the mentality of an immature bully. And if you are, in fact, Native American, then I imagine it must be difficult for you to watch your ancestor's plight take a backseat to that of the Blacks in this country.

reply

LOL. On the contrary, I've humiliated others, such as yourself, and I was never a production person, I earned my degree in film history, theory and criticism.

Now, how aboit you tell the world, what your story is, besides just being a troll and a homophobe, and a creep?

"Digital Filmmaking" is an oxymoron #film #realfilm #Super8mm #16mm #35mm #70mm #filmforever

reply

I'm a writer for film and television.



GQ

reply

> I'm a writer for film and television.

Lord, I hope not.

Although it would explain why the media has gone downhill so badly.

--
What Would Jesus Do For A Klondike Bar (WWJDFAKB)?

reply

And you just proved yourself wrong. Exactly....u don't have to be erect to have someone perform fellatio on you.

If he performed anal sex on the guy, you'd have an argument because he'd have to be erect for that obviously showcasing sexual stimulation. He made him perform fellatio because it's the most degrading/humiliating thing that could be done to a straight man. It shows absolute dominance on SLJ's part and he was laughing because of the vengeance he was receiving. Who laughs out loud when they're enjoying a blowjob?

reply

Who laughs out loud when they're enjoying a blowjob


Me. All the time, doesn't everybody do that?




reply

To me he was just going out of his way to provoke the General so he could shoot him and argue self defense.

reply

Then my what a fertile imagination he has!

GQ

reply