That Rugby vs American Football debate is full of more nationalistic bullsh*t than any other sports debate. One side is like "You guys are wimps for wearing pads" the other says: "Well rugby players wear booty shorts and stick their heads up each others a*ses!" etc.
The contact in Rugby and American Football are both violent and rough. But it happens a lot more, like A LOT more frequently in American Football. Rugby is a game of speed, movement and fluidity as much as it is about violent physical contact. American Football is about violent physical contact, violent physical contact, violent physical contact THEN speed, athleticism and agility. American Football is SO skill specific that there are guys who are paid MILLIONS to basically sprint head first into a brick wall 50-70 times a game. That takes it's toll. American Football is pretty much a human demolition derby. For the record about which player is more tough? I'll take a Hockey player over a Rugby or American Football player any day. Those dudes strap blades to their feet, skate around at 25mph, slam each other into walls and slap around a vulcanized piece of rubber at a guy standing in front of a net.
Last: Soccer players are incredible athletes. To say otherwise is absolutely insane. I watched a World Cup match once and got tired not because I thought the game was boring (the action around the net is every bit as thrilling as in any sport) but because those dudes were running so damn much. Respect that.
"Let's get out of here before one of those things kills Guy!"
reply
share