So is this a pro-communist movie?

As anyone who loves freedom should do, but ask yourself if it's more likely or less likely for you to have freedom if few rich that have arranged the global economy to a ponzi scheme for their benefit have control over the normative power or if there is working democracy?

The golden middleway is what i prefer (which is alot further left than core liberalism), where what right you are allowed and what burden you are meant to carry is decided by the majority of people together - that requires real democracy to function. Right now USA has fascism (which is far right of right wing extremism in its powerstructure).
So we'll see how the USA election goes - my money is that there will be inconsistencies in the votes (weren't there allready cointosses in primary outcomes (?) - which is basically stating that democracy is worthless).

Ignorance is only a bliss if you haven't reached awareness.
My imdb posts are getting altered.

like Communists believe in freedom in speech: Trumbo would have executed pro-capitalist screenwriters if he was in charge

Not back then. Now.

Hollywood's always been plagued by commies, progressives and general perverts but it's only recently that they've taken over the whole outfit

One thing I had not sufficiently addressed was what happened to Mozilla's CEO. There is no question he resigned. Only inflammatory "hate" blogs will say that he was fired. Some prefer to believe that he was pushed out for his beliefs. There is no evidence of that. The resignation was his decision. It is very likely that he felt damage he had done would affect Mozilla's profits, but I am speculating. Firefox browsers alone are non profit but they do make plenty of profits over their ads, etc. He had choices and he alone choose to resign. The unsupported belief that he was fired exists in the minds of those who try to use that "supposition" to support their faulty arguments. They are sure that only one thing could have caused his resignation. No one knows what went on behind the scenes unless they were present when conversations took place. The paragraph I am posting is kind of mild. Most other reputable media organizations used the word "resigned".

The situation just proves that everyone has freedom of speech but they do not have the right to escape the consequences of their speech. They cannot be prosecuted for that speech except in very narrow cases (such as hate speech which is proven to be directly related to the physical harm of someone who was the subject of the hate speech. See KKK cases). In this case the consequence of the CEO's speech was a Twitter storm. I have no problem with the principle that others can react harshly to what you have said. Say anything you want and then see where the chips fall. Then decide what you want to do next.

"Mozilla co-founder Brendan Eich stepped down Thursday as CEO, just days after his appointment. He left the nonprofit maker of the Firefox browser after furious attacks, largely on Twitter, over his $1,000 contribution to support of a now-overturned 2008 gay-marriage ban in California."