MovieChat Forums > Bone Tomahawk (2016) Discussion > Good acting and good directing. But it's...

Good acting and good directing. But it's a bad movie. I'll tell you why.


Because it commits the one, main deadly sin that destroys a movie. It's boring.
You could have William Hurt, Sam Rockwell and Philip Seymour Hoffman directed by Scorsese, it wouldn't matter one damn bit when the movie is boring.
Yes, I know it's a "slow buildup" but it's BORING. And it didn't have to be. Lots of good movies have "slow buildups" or are generally slow, but they are still good.

And here comes the bit that's going to pull everybody's panties into a collective twist:
I turned it off after about one hour. Because it was boring.
I like art films, I admire the works of Von Trier, Malick and Wes Anderson. I do not demand constant action. I demand not boring.

reply

I felt the opposite. I kinda enjoyed the slow build up, the characterisations, the long trek, and then it turned into a silly horror movie about a tribe that can scream like dragons and do enormous backflips when they're shot by a pistol. Did all the production team quit and give the last 30 minutes to Uwe Boll?

--------------------

Suburban Robot That Monitors Reality

reply

dsvart, you're a total fool. Nuff said.

reply

Never post a review of a movie that you didn't watch. Yes, that means all the way.

reply

I wasn't bored for a second with this one but Blade Runner 2049 - OMG, what a drag...

reply

Well boring may be one reason why it's a bad movie, but the main reason is that it is just dead stupid.

reply

I wasn’t bored and I am not big on westerns.

reply