MovieChat Forums > Jessica Jones (2015) Discussion > This is the worst Marvel series to date

This is the worst Marvel series to date


I'm surprised they even thought to make a series on this. Nothing about this series felt like it was a tale of a Superhero or even Marvel comic. This was like watching a lifetime flick. It was extremely raunchy, redundant, lacking any real positive characters and actually it felt like it took forever to end it was very boring. 12-13 episodes about finding one very uninteresting villain with a dull ending. I'm not even sure why the picked such an uninteresting dull marvel B comic character like Jessica Jones to make a series on to begin with when there's so many other characters in the Marvel line up with better more interesting stories and villains. They could of chosen X-23,Spider Woman, Betsy Braddock they all pretty much have the someone messed up my head story line of Jessica Jones but are all 3X as much interesting to read about not to mention watch if they made a movie. It's clear this was a move to empower strong female leads but seriously was Jessica Jones the one they had to pick out of the Marvel line up? Jessica Jones? They might as well have made a TV show about Squirrel Girl. I await to read replies from people who just watched the series and think they know everything but never cracked open a Marvel comic book in their lives. If you think Jessica Jones was a good series or is a good Marvel Character you seriously don't know anything about the Marvel Universe.

reply

luke cage is worse

reply

Yes, Luke Cage is WAY better than this thing.







http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9gCBiJ3QJnk&feature=player_embedded

reply

You clearly 100% have never read a Marvel Comic outside of anything mainstream before like Spiderman and alike, certainly not the defenders that is for sure, the series was great, something a little different, fit in perfectly with the daredevil series.

reply

Stick to your generic typical superhero shows mate, obviously anything outside of your comfort zone is "bad" and make those that enjoy it "not real comic fans" despite most of them liking it because they are comicbook fans who enjoyed the comics.... really not that hard to follow.

reply

Are you crazy? God, it's fantastic!

Up to a certain point. First few episodes and then it kind of dwindled. Maybe there were too many episodes in a season.

reply

Yes this show is garbage.
Never been a fan a Ritter and this show didn't change my mind.
I put watching this show off for so long for a reason but I loved Luke Cage and Daredevil so I thought I'd give it a chance.

I can't stand Rachel Taylor's character and I was filthy they didn't kill her off. Idk why, but I am a fan of Rachel Taylor as an actor but just the character rubs me the wrong way for some reason.

Overall the cast is not very good.

reply

This is certainly a very different series and very polarizing. Someone expecting "more Daredevil" type stuff or who really is into the more traditional vigilante type of show is likely at a disadvantage.

Someone who likes noir or psychological dramas or who is eager for a new take on the "get powers, become a hero" trope is more likely to like this series.

I know you're just stating your opinion and it's valid of course - and others have a similar take. But for me, I liked the way this show was very different from other shows in the genre. I watch nearly everything even loosely "comic book" and I'm getting a bit tired of the formula where someone gets powers, practices on a roof top, sews a costume and then fights crime like a boy scout.

Seeing Jessica first reject/hide her powers and then later on come to fear her own powers was a great new take. And honestly, as much as people day dream of getting bit by a radioactive spider and saving the world, if a teenage kid woke up to find their family dead and that they now have powers they can't explain, I think they would freak out much like Jessica did. Then add to that someone later in life abusing that person and their powers to the point of having them kill an innocent person - wow man.

Anyway, to each their own.

Reading my signature constitutes admission that I am correct. (Too late)

reply

The way I see it, I think some of those put off by Jessica Jones aren't put off by her being a woman, but the genre of the show. The Netflix protagonists are more like antiheroes in traditional detective-film noir works (Luke Cage is the MCU version of The Wire, Jessica Jones is a psychological thriller with horror elements, and Daredevil is a crime drama). And these antiheroes are flawed, not pure-hearted and godlike. And superpowers are more of a liability than a benefit. Matt Murdock gets beaten up to the point of needing medical treatment pretty regularly. Will Simpson's "Reds" make him stronger but also cause him to go insane. Luke Cage has durable skin, but it's a pain in the ass to treat him when something injures him like a shotgun at point-blank range or a Judas bullet. Mind control turns Kilgrave into a 21st century version of Gyp Rosetti. On and on.

reply

Then add to that someone later in life abusing that person and their powers to the point of having them kill an innocent person - wow man.


Well, "innocent". In light of learning Reva's complicity in the Seagate experiments and the cover-ups, I'd say "perceived innocent."

reply

Fair enough. Though I think the impact on Jessica is the same. Unless Jessica at some point discovers Reva's involvement (which is entirely possible). At that point it may help a bit in her dealing with it.

Reading my signature constitutes admission that I am correct. (Too late)

reply

Fair enough. Though I think the impact on Jessica is the same. Unless Jessica at some point discovers Reva's involvement (which is entirely possible). At that point it may help a bit in her dealing with it.


The Defenders speculation.....

reply

Yup.

If IGH is mentioned in any way at all during Iron Fist then that should seal it. I sure hope it's not "the source" of his (or Daredevil's) powers though.

Reading my signature constitutes admission that I am correct. (Too late)

reply

Luke Cage is far far far worse.

reply

Marvel definitely doesn't have the rights to X-23 or Psylocke. And one of the reasons I liked the idea of a Jessica Jones series so much was that she was such an obscure character. She brought less baggage to the table than characters that a lot of people know a bit about. And I disagree that X-23, Psylocke, or Spider-Woman are any more interesting than Jessica. Not to take anything away from those characters, who are all interesting in their own rights, but Jessica allows the writers to explore a dimension that has very rarely been touched upon...the "failed" hero and her redemption.

reply

And one of the reasons I liked the idea of a Jessica Jones series so much was that she was such an obscure character. She brought less baggage to the table than characters that a lot of people know a bit about.


Sorry I think your point is wrong here. You would have to rearrange "baggage" with a word like "Attachments" or "Priorities". As she has plenty of mental trauma which is highlighted and those kinds of issues are considered "baggage," same as things like having children or a troublesome ex can be.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9yPHzOZs44M

reply

Obviously I meant continuity baggage, which should have been apparent from the context.

reply

same as things like having children or a troublesome ex can be.


What continuity are you referring to exactly?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9yPHzOZs44M

reply

Sigh. He means a long history in the comics or in "common knowledge" about the character among non-comic fans. Like how many people know Daredevil is a blind vigilante or that Hulk is angry etc.

He (or she) is not saying the character doesn't have baggage in story - just that the fictional character's history is less complex than some of the comic characters that have been around since the 50s or 70s even.

Reading my signature constitutes admission that I am correct. (Too late)

reply

Well his apparent wasn't apparent to me lol.

Thanks for clarifying, but you didn't need the sigh.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9yPHzOZs44M

reply

FWIW I can't recall why I had that sigh in there. I can't imagine it was directed at you based on re-reading the thread.

Apologies if it came off that way.

Reading my signature constitutes admission that I am correct. (Too late)

reply