Deckard is not a replicant.
He's aged in the teaser trailer. He is in fact a man.
shareSure nuff. I guess we have to assume some of the alternate cuts take place in alternate dimensions.
"I said no camels, that's five camels, can't you count?"
Pics or it didn't happen.
sharePics or it didn't happen.
The replicants are organic. Perhaps Deckard wasn't given the 4-year lifespan failsafe. We can assume that as organic creations, they would age like other organisms.
I don't think an aged Deckard proves or disproves anything.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4FE9SLJ2Xoc
He was never a replicant. In the P.K. Dick's story he is not a replicant. It never made any sense in the film for him to be a replicant. It was always just Ridley misinterpreting things and fans running with that.
The entire premise of Blade Runner relies on Deckard being a human.
Agreed 100%
4 8 15 16 23 42
He is a replicant in the book, what are you talking about? He has always been a replicant and he will be in this sequel
shareVictorkalab .. did you even read the book/short story? He isn't a replicant- good lord people flap their gums without knowing facts. lol
shareHe is a replicant in the book, what are you talking about? He has always been a replicant and he will be in this sequel
Read it again pal.
4 8 15 16 23 42
No, he is not a replicant in the original story.
shareHis ageing doesn't prove it one way or the other.
shareThat old chestnut again... He's a Replicant, does he have a lifespan that's the question
shareJust because he's a replicant doesn't mean he has the four year lifespan. Tyrell mentioned that earlier models didn't have the four year lifespan.
shareHey may be the same design as Rachael, along with many others that Im sure we learn about in this movie. Racheal didn't even know she was a replicant at first and she had no "end date"
share