Muddled mess of a movie
Extremely disappointing movie with an ending that was so illogical it made me go “What the…?”
A company wants the Tasmanian Tiger so bad that they will (despite their own best interests and logic) kill an environmentalist because he MIGHT have seen one once a few years ago (according to his daughter) and will incinerate a mother and child (even though they were able to break in and steal the coordinates from Martin’s desk without waking anyone) will now respond to Martin’s final actions with “Oh, he found it’s den and killed it. That’s a wrap guys! Call off the hunt.” That’s just silly.
I have three major problems with this movie.
1.) Martin was a little bit of a loner in the beginning and not so much at the end. I love subtle but this arc was nearly non-existent, muddled and unnecessary.
2.) The company’s logic is stupefying. Why would anyone bother to kill the environmentalist or his family? It’s an unnecessary risk. It’s not like the Armstrong’s were keeping a pet Tazzy Tiger in the backyard and weren’t sharing it. To that point, if Martin decided he didn’t want to hunt it, then they just would hire another hunter. It’s not like he ran off with their money. Where’s the motivation for anything the company was doing?
3.) The ending; Martin decides to kill the last of the species to keep the company from getting it?!!?!? That’s nuts! Why not just have him go native out there protecting it from other hunters?!? How does he even know it’s the last one, that doesn’t make sense? Others have mentioned the possible medical benefits its body might provide, but what about just saving it for the sake of saving it?
And don’t get me started on Sam Neill’s muddled story line. Not his fault, great actor but was he friends with loggers, sexually interested in Ms. Armstrong, working for the company (and complicate)?!?!?!?
The story is just so busy making its point that it fails to tell a coherent story.