The casting of a black actor to play the role of Roland 'The Gun Slinger' Deschain is an absoulute joke. Political correctness once again at its finest. Im all for equal rights and all that mindless babble people of this day and age seem to bang on about but this is absoulutley just pathetic.
Idris Elba is a great actor, I wont dispute that. My issue is not with Idris Elba, my issue lies with a white main character being replace by a black man? I mean for these deluded fools that argue "where does it say he's white" read the actual books correctly and pay attention. Blue bombadier eyes. White. WHITE.. not black? I Mean what an absoulute joke? Whats next? Is Susannah going to be chinese on crutches? Is Eddie Dean going to he homosexual? Is Jake going to be 30 years old?
All the comments stating directors etc have said they arent interested in the complaints of the loyal fans to this amazing story such as myself should be ashamed! I wont be paying a penny towards the box office earnings of this film and I hope it flops massively to prevent any more being produced.
Heres an idea why not make a movie about queen elizabeth and give the role to a muslim? Or how about we make a movie about mike tyson with a german woman starring as tyson himself? Replace the titanic itself with a jet ski instead of the boat itself?
However this has been allowed is an absoulute joke! Totally deystroying the masterpiece of a story.
Dont waste your time or effort with the boring old cards and labels you PC Do-Gooders throw around either the whole racism, sexism whatever else you want to throw in the mix its boring and ineffective.
I can only hope people avoid the film as to avoid any further slaughter of this work and stick to the original books.
I think Elba would be a better man in black (No pun intended), than Roland. Also, I don't remember half the characters in the cast list. Who the he'll is jill?
I have little interest in even responding to you however as irony goes here I am replying. If the story was centered around a black main character and was scrapped and a white actor was cast there would be total outrage, theyd have protests and the whole shabang of *beep* all these nutcases go off doing these days. My points are valid, you disagree, youre entitled to that.
You are right. In fact, it is racist to change the race at all. So in other words, they are racist for forcing a black actor into this role. What kind of casting director would submit a picture of a black man where it says a white man with blue eyes? Simply does not compute. Obviously, they are pandering to racist SJWs who hate white men.
That's right, those who argue for changing a character's race or sex to fit the times are showing their racism. Why wouldn't they stick to honouring what was written that they see fit to use the name of in the first place for their PC project?
Haha to for the times... brah that *beep* doesn't even factor in for me. Dudes a badass actor certainly can have the attitude of a gunslinger(luther) so I don't gives a *beep* what color he is...but I guess that's just because the times we live in!!
So if this was 1950 you would be cool with them changing a black character to a white one so as not to offend the audiences? Ok, that's what I thought. You are a racist.
Thank you for enlightening me! I knew I was living a lie I just didn't know what it was now I do. Let's start a petition to go back to the 50's ya know the good ol days where change or equality wasn't even talked about nor accepted! Who needs that crap! What good has that ever done
its weird how you are blind to the fact that its not political correctness at all.
You cant see that your post is politically incorrect, that's the ionly issue here.
comparing Godzilla to a chicken.,...is the same as comparing one man to another man? NO, its comparing man to another species of animal, based on his colour. That kind of thinking died out in the America in the 19th century was slavery was abolished. Time to move on, General Lee.
The comment I made about godzilla being replaced by a chicken has nothing to do with any one at all thats just you trying to instigate some *beep* racism accusation you can throw at me? It means in a nutshell clearly as you are unable to read things in context that you cant go changing things as central and as important as roland being white. It messes with the entire story? I mean such as jake? It wouldnt make so much of a difference but obviously it would still have a big effect on the story obviously but roland however should not have been altered in any way! I mean fine they could have had roland with maybe ginger hair who knows minor changes wouldnt matter that greatly but to change the mans ethnicity is just way to extreme of an adjustment. First rule of any film,book or any sort of story in general in most cases anyways is "dont *beep* with the original".
Saul Coulson, I agree with you 100% I am an avid reader of Horror, Thrillers, and crime and mystery. I have read everything that King has wrote. I Deem The Dark Tower to be the best story ever told, in his genre. Read it twice over and prayed for the day to come when The Dark Tower is being showed on the big picture screen. I was excited as hell when the first rumors came around, then I hear there is a movie being made and to be ready in 2017. At this point, I can't sleep. Then my girlfriend reads me the latest as to who is playing Roland and the rest of the katet. I was floored! Stunned! Devastated to hear, call me a racist, if you must, that Idris Elba is going to be Roland. I just can not phathom as to why they would compromise an extremely important character and story of a fantastic fantasy novel, with who Roland is. His white skin and blue eyes are throughout the story. Also, the racial tension between Roland and Detta Walker is a very big part of the story. To me, this adaptation of one of my favorite stories has been changed so much, that I can not go into the theatre and expect to see what is etched into my mind. It will be a totally different fantasy journey that I will have to come to terms to accept, as just that, another fantasy movie.
My hopes for the adaptation I was hoping to see, are gone forever.
Mr. King! How could you let this happen??? It is bad enough the movie industry doesn't give you a decent budget and competent film makers, but to utterly change the main character and compromise the whole story, is just terrible. What else is changed? Is Roland's katet the same, otherwise? is their journey the same or totally changed? May as well be different, there is no Roland Deshain that I know of. Just some other guy. Pffft!
Sorry Captain, With the discussions I have had, over the years, the relationship between Roland and Detta Walker always came up. Everyone remembers these critical relationships. Just like everyone remembers what Roland looks like, per The Dark Tower. It is a shock of disappointment for those of us that were waiting for Roland to show up. I'm expecting to see another Django.
Let me ask you this and please answer honestly. What would you have thought, if the film makers decided to cast Mark Wahlberg as Ali? Wahlberg has a build, he could probably learn to box enough to get by. But would his color be a problem?
Yes, but, as I've stated in previous posts, that still doesn't mean it's not important to character development. It was only in a quarter of one book because it was something Detta had to overcome, as a person, and move past. A character trait doesn't have to extend its way through an entire franchise, and be continuously present, in order for it to be relevant to the character themself, so page count is not usually an accurate representation of relevance. I do get where you're coming from, but this isn't always necessary to define a character, in my experience.
For example, if a character experiences troubles with intimacy due to a past rape experience, but learns to become physically close to a person in the first quarter of a novel, does it cease to be relevant to the character, simply due to the lesser amount of pages dedicated to it? It's a quality over quantity thing, m'man. I mean, Roland's duel with Cort is a pretty small portion of the first book, but that doesn't mean it wasn't a defining moment for the character.
And I know the argument: "What, she couldn't hate Roland for other reasons?"
Yeah, she could... but, personally, I'm yet to hear a reason that is even fractionally as impactful as seething, ingrained racism. That's an extremely high hurdle for a character to overcome. The Uncle Tom defense is equally as weak, in my opinion, but that's just me. I may be a working screenwriter, but I'm definitely not writing Hollywood blockbusters yet, so what do I know? Haha.
Anyway, just how I feel, personally, not saying you're wrong in how you feel.
As always, I respect your opinion and you're entitled to it.
Man, I wish there were a way to exchange emails, or something of that ilk, through IMDb. I'd love to debate this with ya in a less public forum; you're one of the intelligent ones. I always enjoy our interactions. :)
Good to see you, jpfurlong79. You are one of the precious voices of sanity and maturity on this board that I always appreciate the opportunity to speak with.
Now, here comes a disagreement .
Detta Walker never got over anything...she was a grossly exaggerated stereotype of an American black woman from the 1960s that was essentially pushed aside thanks to magic which was made available to Odetta (the primary personality) via the final beach doorway. Ultimately, Odetta absorbed some of her assertiveness plus street smarts and, in the process, became Susannah. It was not as if Detta herself was the original woman that slowly and naturally came to grips with her ugliness in order to become a better person.
--- It is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing .
Heh, thankya. We may not see eye to eye on the whole Roland thing, but it's good to have a respectful debate on the subject.
You present a very good argument.
Personally, I found it very satisfying to see the melding of the two personalities in the books. I suppose "overcome" wasn't the right word, when I used it earlier, in regards to Susannah. In a sense, I guess I felt more like the defeat of a villain. Metaphorically, it could be viewed as victory over racism, too. Detta being the personification of that.
You raise a very interesting point about Detta being a stereotype of sorts. Thinking about that from a studio's point of view, that could definitely be something a studio might want to avoid. Very illuminating. Well-stated, sir.
Honestly, as long as they don't make her a white supremacist or use the Uncle Tom angle, they'll keep my attention. :P It's just very hard for me (and many others, it seems) to divorce myself from King's work, visually; he really solidified things in my mind's eye, unerringly, but we'll always have the novels and comics, regardless, won't we? :)
Thanks for the thoughtful reply, Cap. It's always appreciated.
Just wrote a whole response to a question you didn't ask, because I misread your post. Whoops! :P
I just feel like it's a copout, honestly. When someone treats someone as an Uncle Tom, it's usually used in the context of shame and disappointment, maybe even disgust, but not necessarily rage and fury. And there isn't necessarily anything that would make Detta think that Roland was sympathizing with the white man. I mean, what would make her assume that?
A white Roland embodied everything that Detta hated, as far as her character is concerned. Kindhearted Odetta was fighting for equal rights between black and white folk (all people, technically), so throwing an "Uncle Tom" into the mix just doesn't quite feel like something that would be at the very top of racist ol' Detta's proverbial *beep* list. Sure, she'd feel he was a "race traitor", but would she hate him with the fury of a thousand suns, the way she hates the white man who pushed her in front of a subway train and cost her her legs. The rage that she now projects onto other white men? I don't feel the two concepts are on par. :-/
It's definitely up for debate, though, I suppose. They could possibly have her say something like, "The only thing I hate worse than a honky is an Uncle Tom.", and it would work, but for me, I just feel like Goldsman painted himself into a corner, once the casting was locked in, and that was the best he could come up with to rectify the issue.
I dunno. We'll have to wait a long time to see how they address it. Right now, everything is just supposition.
A bit of a non sequitur: there is also the little bit in the books about Odetta herself almost being viewed as an Uncle (Aunt?) Tom of sorts, because her family is rather wealthy, and she is seen as not quite subject to the same hardships of other minorities. I believe there was some mention of how people treated her differently because of this. Wasn't a huge thing, and I'm sure it could be omitted for the sake of the film franchise, but I'm pretty sure it was there. Not really relevant to this debate, but whatever. :P
Anyways, for me, it just doesn't feel as strong. Not that it's awful or anything, just not quite as impactful.
I just feel like it's a copout, honestly. When someone treats someone as an Uncle Tom, it's usually used in the context of shame and disappointment, maybe even disgust, but not necessarily rage and fury.
Given the psychotic nature of this specific split personality, I really don't see a problem with her needlessly amplifying a misconstrued statement into a full-blown brawl. Remember that she sabotaged Roland and Eddie on countless occasions simply out of pure meanness.
And there isn't necessarily anything that would make Detta think that Roland was sympathizing with the white man. I mean, what would make her assume that?
Any number of things. Roland consoling Eddie in his own stoic way or providing practical survival advice. Polite conversation between both men could be interpreted as some conspiracy against her.
A white Roland embodied everything that Detta hated, as far as her character is concerned. Kindhearted Odetta was fighting for equal rights between black and white folk (all people, technically), so throwing an "Uncle Tom" into the mix just doesn't quite feel like something that would be at the very top of racist ol' Detta's proverbial *beep* list. Sure, she'd feel he was a "race traitor", but would she hate him with the fury of a thousand suns, the way she hates the white man who pushed her in front of a subway train and cost her her legs. The rage that she now projects onto other white men? I don't feel the two concepts are on par. :-/
Maybe a little less...at first...but remember that she likened his disembodied mind in her own head to a "raping" presence and he does keep her in bondage. On top of that, because he is a man from another world entirely (with alien mannerisms and vocabulary/idioms) that possesses a lawman's bearing and one who "colludes" with white man Eddie Dean to (in her eyes) restrict her every freedom, I can see her hate simmer until it boils, spills over, and scalds Elba-Roland.
--- It is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing .
reply share
I see where you're coming from, it just still feels like it requires too much exposition.
A white man took her legs, so that's technically the root of Detta's most aggressive hatred, psychologically. That was when she was truly "born". At least that's what I got from it.
You know what would be interesting, though? If Jack Mort was black. Dunno if that would work in the long run, but it could solidify an Uncle Tom viewpoint. Even better, though, it would actually subdue the racism element quite a bit and make it more about hating men. Hmmm.
I think a more apt representation would be Michael B. Jordan cast in the role of Derek Vinyard for a remake of American History X. Haha! I'd love to hear the rationalization of that casting. :P
What argument ya durned cullert! I was just proposing a good idea. I'm also for Jim parsons playing Shaft in the remake. hoi hoi hoi hoi hoi kabeebo dufffuuuuuu!
Oy would ye be having marbles in thee head, cully? Might as well make a reboot of The Magnificent Seven with Denzel Washington in the Yul Brynner...er...oh, wait...
I don't know if you're aware of this but I've already changed things. I killed Ben Linus. --Sayid
Roland is a made up character so changing the colour of his skin for a movie should not be such a big thing! Casting somebody racially different for a person who actually exists - that is wrong!
Yes, in the books, Roland was white and this held some importance to parts of the book. Initially I was shocked with Idris being cast, but I would prefer a great actor who is black than a mediocre actor who looks the part. I am looking forward to seeing what he can bring to the character.
Maybe you would be happier with Matt Damon or Ben Stiller playing Roland?
Wahlberg was actually great as Micky Ward, no need for him to bother with Ali.
But in all serious, i would like Detta to stay intact on all levels. Her racism, her interactions with Roland and Eddie, all of it. Some argue that Roland being black need not interfere with Detta's character arc but i disagree. Sure her Honky mahfah talk can just be directed towards Eddie and her base hatred in general can be directed to Roland. But Detta is a fleshed out character that i personally enjoyed reading, especially her interaction with Roland. I would even say i think the culmination of her and Odetta in forming Susannah is still more Detta than Odetta. Whenever there is gun play needed, demon rape to be had, plates to be thrown - Detta's our girl, perhaps the true gunslinger out of her 3 personalities.
“We may need Detta Walker,” he said. “Is she around?” “That bitch always around. The Wastelands
It's one thing to argue that a character's race can be changed as long as it doesn't change who they actually are in character development, but it's another to say that Detta's character won't be at least somewhat changed to make allowances for this decision.
I know you're tired of it, Cap, but the racial tension angle does come up a lot in these forums and it's not gonna go away. :-/ It did mean something to a lot of people. Gotta respect that much. I know there's nothing we can really do about it at this point, and maybe they have a very clever way of getting around it, but many people really did like that approach. It was there on the pages hen Mr. King wrote it, people remember it very keenly, so the argument will never die, unfortunately. :-/
Just gotta roll with it, m'man--always gonna be haters--But the movies will be what they will be regardless of how much anyone dislikes the decision. I'm definitely curious to see how Sussanah shakes out, once they get to her. Should be interesting, nomatter the outcome.