Natalie Portman doesn't deserve to have 2 Oscars
She's not Cate Blanchett or Meryl
She didn't even deserve the one she got for Black Swan
She's not Cate Blanchett or Meryl
She didn't even deserve the one she got for Black Swan
You're nuts
share
Especially, since she even deserve the first one...
'Ne cherchez plus mon coeur, les bêtes l'ont mangé.' Baudelaire
You're right. Portman does NOT deserve two Oscars. She deserves THREE Oscars. Maybe, four. Or five. Yes, FIVE!
shareI think Portman is a little overrated but she deserved it for Black Swan.
Who else deserved It that year?
I agree in principle. IMO she's not a terribly gifted actress and didn't deserve to win for Black Swan. That being said, she's really good in Jackie and it would just be another case of the timing being off if she loses chiefly because voters don't want to award her a second time. In a vacuum, she'd be a worthy winner this year.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=opcKTe7ePgk
I agree. She is so amateurish.
Her acting has changed little from when she was an adolescent/young adult.
Where the Heart is was on the other day and man she's terrible. Anywhere but here was bad too.
Black Swan was ok, but you can always tell that she's playing dress-up.
Folks, did you see Arrival? If Amy Adams wins for that, Jennifer Lawrence wins for Passengers. I think Viola Davis has it, personally. But cast your vote for Natalie because this was an amazing role and she knocked it out of the park.
shareI haven't seen "Jackie" yet, but I did see "Fences" and Viola Davis was SUPERB. If she's in the Best Actress Category, she will be a tough one to beat. Honestly, I think she deserves it.
But she will more than likely be in the Best-Supporting Category, in which case it will probably go to either Natalie or maybe Emma Stone. I don't think Amy Adams deserves it I'm sorry... Way too many stronger performances this year.