Seriously....


This was boring! Really boring! There was nothing! maybe the book was good but seriously...BORING! I've seen good films and this IMO does not deserve 7.5!

reply

It is unbearable.

reply

i decided to watch it with a mate although in separate locations...we kepts txting each other saying it has to get better...it didnt! dissaapoooiinting!

reply

[deleted]

HAHAHAHA!

reply

Character studies aren't boring per se.

THe problem s that you were in a hurry. I won't go conjecturing on Ad Hominem, but I have to guess that you're young, immature, and not ready for character studies... maybe not a fan of mockumentaries like Best in Show etc.

Again, not sure... and being young and immature is NOT an insult.

I'm just saying. I collect horror movies, yet one of my favorite flicks ever is Mystery, Alaska.


So to each their own.

However, anybody that throws down "BORING" in caps and can't logically/intelligently articulate their reasoning is going to be dismissed from any fruitful discussion regarding cinema. And anyone that is texting "OMG boring" needs to pay more attention, or... watch a romantic comedy. Your choice.

http://us.imdb.com/name/nm2339870/

reply

[deleted]

No he doesn't.

reply

LOL.....my thoughts exactly and very well said without being insulting. Reading this person's post that the movie was boring actually reminded me of my husbands interpretation of the movie because anytime he has to sit and actually "listen" or pay attention to a storyline rather than just watching a bunch of cars getting blown up or the like he thinks it's boring.....I always tell him that every now and then it's good to use your intellect to absorb a story rather than having everything just thrown in your face!!

reply

I'm worried some of you people might find this movie a little too much like real life. Personally I kept thinking how horrible it is that people actually live like this. I work for medicare/ medicaid and I know there really is this class of person that are living on the scraps of society. Call it what you want, but finding it boring must mean you have no sociological interest at all.

But sometimes, movies just don't click with you for whatever reason. It's not like you must like every movie others do.

reply

Yea, this kind of life is terrible, and yea it should have been griping & emotionally charged, but it just wasn't. It was boring & executed poorly. Maybe it was the mediocre actors/acting. Maybe it was the direction. Who knows... It just plain didn't work, and it has nothing to do with the subject matter.



IMDB Film Ratings: http://www.imdb.com/mymovies/list?l=22271274

reply

[deleted]

Yea, that's what I said. I completely saw through all of the acting. That's right! I happen to be extremely perceptive. I had no real emotional connection to any part except for the scene where she had to help cut her fathers hands off. That was chilling & extremely emotional.

Ok, well you can get mad all you like & insult me. I have impeccable taste in films & music, I create both, and I'm sorry if this just didn't work for me.

Just because a film is nominated doesn't make it good or the best. Alice in Wonderland is nominated, so is 127 Hours. Movies are nominated for a myriad of reasons, like someone didn't win the year before, or they feel like throwing someone a bone. Whatever... I guarantee this film won't win any awards. Hit me back if it does, but I won't be holding my breath.


IMDB Film Ratings: http://www.imdb.com/mymovies/list?l=22271274

reply

[deleted]

Honestly, there must be something wrong with you. I don't mean any offense, but your comment about the Social Network is ridiculous. Snoozefest??!! Whatever. It's clearly one of the most gripping dramas of the past few years, and contains the best rapid-fire dialogue since His Girl Friday. On the other hand, Winter's Bone is terribly paced and never gains enough momentum too be truly engaging. It was extremely weak filmmaking. Talk about snoozefest!

reply

[deleted]

I said what I said. Pulp Fiction is gay.

reply

Pulp Fiction is attracted to other movies of the same sex?

For relaxing times, make it Suntory time.

reply

I said what I said. Pulp Fiction is gay.


Pulp Fiction is attracted to other movies of the same sex?


No...Pulp Fiction is attracted to other movies of the same genre.

...and it loves tight bicycle shorts.

reply

Gay as in the adjective, happy/fun, or as in the noun, as in a homosexual, really well dressed, funny, wealthy & good looking?

IMDB Film Ratings: http://www.imdb.com/mymovies/list?l=22271274

reply

I think you've been brainwashed by hollywood if you think most gays are well dressed, funny, wealthy and good looking. That is a myth just like hot lesbians.

reply

Listsen honey, I live in New York City. I dunno where you reside, but here, people look good.

xxo

My Ratings: http://www.imdb.com/user/ur10767293/ratings

reply

[deleted]

"The Social Network" is one of the worst films of all time. A total piece of crap from start to finish.

reply

[deleted]

My advice to you, son: don't try a career as a movie critic.

reply

Thanks for the advice! ;-)

IMDB Film Ratings: http://www.imdb.com/mymovies/list?l=22271274

reply

It's better than a lot of the big studio movies that are floating around.

Alison Lohman for Supergirl

reply

[deleted]

"correction, it didn't work for YOU."

Which suggests it DID work for you. So all you're saying is that the guy above saw through the movie, based on their own experiences, and you, with less experience of the situations represented, were drawn in or fooled by it.

Honestly, it's not an either/or thing, but to suggest that the movie is good, provided you're unfamiliar with the lifestyle depicted, is self-defeating. You want people to see this great movie that says so much... unless they're already familiar with the lifestyle portrayed, in which case they better butt out...

Like the launching of many best intentions it has nowhere good to land.

We all see the same thing, but we get to choose how we interpret it.

reply

"Yea, this kind of life is terrible, and yea it should have been griping & emotionally charged, but it just wasn't. It was boring & executed poorly. Maybe it was the mediocre actors/acting. Maybe it was the direction. Who knows... It just plain didn't work, and it has nothing to do with the subject matter."

Summer blockbusters are coming soon.Then you will be entertained again ;)

reply

Don't be stupid... this guy is clearly into intelligent filmmaking and isn't saying he needed a summer blockbuster. I agree with him, Winter's Bone is lame. I like slower, thought-provoking films, but it was weak filmmaking and has been grossly over-rated. Get a clue.

reply

@raydazur

Yes, that's right, when all else fails, resort to insults. That will surely prove your point. Sticks & stones my friend.


I like all types of films if they're executed well, even summer blockbusters. :-)


IMDB Film Ratings: http://www.imdb.com/mymovies/list?l=22271274

reply

He has a point. I wouldn't be surprised of those who heavily preferred summer blockbusters couldn't stand and discuss such a film like "WB."

reply

I kept thinking that this is a side of America that not many people outside of America know about...

reply

If you had to think about how poor they live then obviuosly the movie didnt raise those feelingsi nside you by itself, and in essence, failed. I personally wanted to get touched by the movie, but it just didnt get me involved. It wasnt boring per se, but it wasnt something i would watch and forget about other things.

----------
"Common sense is not so common."
- Voltaire

reply

This was a case study of Republican voters.

Honestly. These are the type of people who vote Republicans; scared of everything and everyone, and tricked into thinking there is some other class of people coming to "take from them what is theirs."

reply

[deleted]

Or it just means that they didn't care for the movie.

And I now I ask you: would you give a fvck what pants the son of a b!tch who shot you was wearing?

reply

That's exactly right. If I was a sheltered 15 year old teen I wouldn't understand this movie, I would think it was "boring".

But I have known drug addicts, criminals, people who have been in domestic violence situations. So characters like teardrop resonate.

I think Lawrence was outstanding and she deserves all of the Hollywood success she gets, because the talent is clearly there (even though subsequent roles may not use it).

John Hawkes also deserves a lot of recognition for this film. The direction and production are great, the writing is great, a high quality (and creepy) film.

reply

Winter's Bone is a powerful movie that gets you thinking. Lawrence shines in every scene and really makes the movie memorable.


------- __@
----- _`\<,_
---- (*)/ (*)------- ----__@
--------------------- _`\<,_
---- -----------------(*)/ (*)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~:*•.. ¤°.¸¸.•´¯`»nec spe,nec metu :*•.. ¤°.¸¸.•´¯`»

reply

The movie showed simple rural life which really isn't all bad. In fact, in the movie they showed how close knit and neighborly the people often were, even the ones who were in conflict. The horrible part was the very active, open, and dangerous, drug culture portrayed: cooking, dealing, and using drugs. That's the lure of fast money and it's an outside influence - you don't cook meth with farm and forest rural ingredients.

I assume you haven't lived in the country and you think living without the comforts and conveniences of city life and culture is a terrible evil forced on people. I grew up on a farm and I still live in a state with LOTS of people who, by choice, raise or hunt their own food and, by your standards, are poorer than poor. But they quite happily live "on the scraps of society", a society and a lifestyle they reject as much as you would theirs. This summer I might be one of them, moving from the city to build an isolated cabin and micro-farm far out of town.

Personally, I found the movie well-acted but harsh and painful to watch. And it WAS a bit too much like real life; we have an unhealthy number of drug cookers popping up here; city folks will pay big money for their "conveniences".

reply

This movie requires the viewer to have an iq and an attention span. If you have neither, then stick with movies like Twilight or Pirates of the Caribbean. This movie is spectacular and the acting peerless. So get a life.

reply

Don't be so ignorant. If there are people who aren't impressed by Winter's Bone, it doesn't mean they're all morons who only like eye candy. I'm a film-maker and have studied film for more than two decades. I like thought-provoking films, and this was just plain awful. The writing was half-baked, so was the direction, and the acting was average. Even good actors like John Hawkes can only do so much with weak material. I'll go out on a limb here and say that I have a stellar IQ and attention span; you clearly think highly of yourself as well, but that doesn't mean that the many people who were unimpressed with this film have no intelligence. Peerless acting? Hardly. Lawrence was decent. But none of the performances were memorable. If you want to know what acting is, look at Beatrice Straight's Oscar-winning performance (mainly, the divorce scene) in Network. That's peerless acting. Go watch that, then watch Winter's Bone again and get back to me.

reply

You may need a few more decades of studying film then, to see why this movie is so good. IQ doesn't equate maturity.

reply

Is your argument: it's good? If you can't tell me why it's good, after I made my case, then it's pretty clear who has made a mature argument. If you like the film, that's different from offering a critical response. I don't like it, but aside from my personal feelings, I think it was flawed filmmaking. That's what I have to say about it... a paragraph with substance. Now you try.

reply

[deleted]

stellar IQ? studying film for decades? film maker? argument of substance?

Why would your opinion carry more wait than others? I want to see your wiki and IMDd page, honey. Show and tell.

reply

First, I didn't care for this flick.

Second, "evolman123" has got to be the biggest douchebag on the internet. That is saying a lot.

"I'm a filmmaker and musician, and my IQ is stellar."

Add "Total Douchebag" to your resume. You laughable nitwit.

reply

I disagree.

reply

I agree.

reply

Look. I staved off the expectation early on that this movie was going to be highly sensory stimulating. I could tell during the first scene that it wasn't going to send my emotions up, down, and around on a roller-coaster. So I put my mind in the right perspective and watched the movie, enjoying it to the end.

It was like being on a field trip to that part of Missouri, and your tour guide was Ree. You see life in the backwoods AS IS. Not Hollywoodized up and overexaggerated just to satisfy viewers' fancy. The story is filmed in a way that would occur REALISTICALLY. I wouldn't be surprised if no setting preparation was done. They could have just filmed right on location and paid the people who really lived there to 'leave things as is.'

The movie is told from Ree's point of view, and her perspective is all you're meant to know. (Which is how it would be if you were really there following her in real life. If you understand that, you understand why some questions aren't answered.

That's what makes it good.

reply

You don't have a stellar IQ. People who say that aren't as smart as they think they are.

reply

[deleted]

i also found this movie unbelievably boring

i liked Lost In Translation and Somewhere a lot more, so i do like slower paced films. Just not this one....i really tried but this movie did not work for me at all.

reply

I didn't care for lost in translation, but I did like this one. To each their own.

reply

the OP stated he/she was watching it with a "mate". so i assume that means he/she is not american. so i doubt the social eliments of mountain people translate very well to other countries. it worked for me because i have lived in areas like this setting and so the characters and the story was very realistic to me. i guess it just depends on whether you can relate and get attacted to the characters or not.

reply

What you said must be right.

I'm from Brazil and I disliked this movie.
It was boring to me too.

Here in the south we are poor. Not the miserable poor, but poor. I make my life with 5k dollars a year.

All I could think while watching this was "you people are in the fc.king USA! How can you be that miserable???"

So the movie was geting boring, and boring, and boring...And I was like "no complains about my life anymore...At least i'm happy here in Brazil"

I don't know...the movie just didn't worked for me, as a foreign.
6/10 for the acting.


Sorry for my english. As I said, i'm from Brazil.

reply

The people in this movie were not miserable because they were poor. They were miserable because they had a crappy family life; a teenage girl was forced to hunt down her meth-cooking father because his selfish ass couldn't even provide his family a home...

The movie was pretty slow and boring but it hit close to home with me because I come into contact with people just like this every day :(

reply

Where you are and how much money you have has very little to do with how happy you are.

reply

I don't think this is a good point at all. It's the story, and the slow, droning way it is told that's boring. This could just as easily have been set in New York City and would have been just as boring.

Nothing you have to say is anywhere near as useful or important as you think it is.

reply

It's valid reason since it's culture. If you transfer the story to NYC it'll take on a different, tone, vibe, and pace. NYC isn't the Ozarks. The issues dealt in "WB" aren't universal. You're comparing apples to oranges. I don't necessarily get intimidated by concrete jungles (unless it's Tokyo) and rural, isolated poverty is different from urban poverty. People in urban poverty usually don't listen to country music or play a banjo. You see no social worker aid the Dollys. The only thing that parallels directly in such a case is drugs.

reply

Should have been obvious that I was disagreeing overall. I don't think it has anything to do with culture. I think you can fully understand and relate to the "culture" this movie tries to represent and still find it agonizingly boring.

Nothing you have to say is anywhere near as useful or important as you think it is.

reply

[deleted]

As it goes, there are many many movies out there that aren't what you might be used to. Movies that don't follow a linear plot, or have a clear resolution to the plot, what you might call unconventional.

Sounds like you haven't really seen many independently produced 'art' movies. You 'boring' is another person's 'riveting'. That you can't articulate what made it so boring in your opinion suggests that you don't have the film knowledge or experience to fully appreciate a movie like Winter's Bone.

Can you perhaps list the movies you did enjoy this past year?

reply


I didn't like the film too much and did find it boring. I thought it was directed well, but nothing extraordinary. I also liked Jennifer Lawrence's performance. I definitely think this film was overrated, but still probably one of the better films of 2010, which I thought was a pretty poor year for film.

Trash Humpers and A Prophet were a couple of my favorites from 2010. I like many slow-paced or subjectively boring films...it's just that Winter's Bone wasn't that great of a neo noir story. It was hard for me to believe Merab Milton would help Ree in the end.

reply

There's subtle hints that Merab has an affinity for Ree. In fact, several character's do throughout the film- watch the bondsman's slight change of demeanor after he asks Ree how old she is. The area is just so poverty-stricken that all of them have their own problems to sort out, much less help a stranger's.

Merab's actions were pretty much dictated by Thump... once "word" started spreading about the Milton drama, the situation pretty much needed to get squashed. It wasn't just an act of decency, but it made sense to the operation of things.

And Trash Humpers was the most boring hour and fourteen minutes of my life. Harmony Korine is on some good drugs.

Winter's Bone: Best film of 2010. Jennifer Lawrence is the next big thing.

reply

[deleted]

2010 was a stellar year for film. Many years from now, The Social Network, Black Swan, True Grit, The Fighter, Toy Story 3, Enter the Void, Dogtooth, Inception, Carlos, The King's Speech, etc. will all be remembered quite well. It was certainly a better year than the previous one, when Avatar and The Hurt Locker were the only films that won any awards, and both of those are just average.

reply

[deleted]

Hey man, it's an opinion. I get it, you didn't like the movie.
No need to work so hard to try and convince me or anyone else of it.


reply

Sorry for over-doing it. I had too much coffee. :) But, yes, I was disappointed in the movie. And not b/c I'm unable to think or pay attention or appreciate movies that aren't action-packed, as some people are suggesting about anyone who isn't into Winter's Bone. I like good filmmaking; this one just wasn't good, to me. I do know some people who love it, so clearly people are having different reactions to it. But I don't agree with all the hype.

reply

I don't understand how anyone could think this movie was boring. I was riveted. Here's a 17-year-old who apparently has had to drop out of school to take care of her younger brother and sister because their meth-making father has disappeared and their mother has had a mental breakdown. She's got to find her father or they'll lose their house, but really, there's nothing she can do except hope for a lucky break or someone to feel sorry for her, without her having to beg, which her sense of honor won't let her do. The scene where she tried to join the army to get the $40,000 recruiting fee was heartbreaking. And you thought it was boring when the main gangster family beat her up? And when the women from that gangster family want to take her out on a lake, claiming they'll take her to her father's body? You didn't think that she might think they were going to drown her to shut her up after they've already beaten her up and presumably know who killed her father, maybe killed him themselves? That was boring??!!

reply

Well, yes.

reply

@sjr1991:I was riveted also. It wasn't immediate, but it only took about ten minutes. That movie pulled me right into it, it was very emotional for me. I watched it the next day with my husband. His standard fare is traditional westerns with John Wayne, but I asked him to give WB a chance. He got into it. I'm surprised at the amount of negative posts, but I'm all for diversity of opinion. Boring to me would be everyone having the same opinion, and that would make a very dull message board.

reply

Give me an example of a good movie then, hiren_vekaria ?

reply

[deleted]

yeah, her performance was rigid but it was supposed to be, but at the same time i wasnt entirely invested in her. i cared about the kids, though. that one scene where they both crawl into bed with her after she got beat up tugged at the heart strings a lil bit. i thought the guy who played teardrop did a great job.

ON A SEPARATE NOTE,

it is important to ask oneself why he or she didn't like a character in a movie. Part of the reason that so many people are interested in movies is because of the characters. We see parts of ourselves or parts of others that we know personally in these characters. And when we dislike a character, it may be because they remind us of someone we actually know and dislike. Or something in ourselves that we dislike.

Or it may be because they're crappy actors and the script was written terribly.

regardless, I enjoyed this film. The ending bothered me because in my head I was saying "okay, what now? Nothing changed." But that was the whole point, I think. Nothing changed. She still is stuck taking care of her siblings in this crappy situation in this crappy community. Teardrop should maybe get an oscar nomination.

Two lines that made me cringe (should have been cut):

"Here's a doobie for the walk."

and

[paraphrasing)

the protagonist to her friend after she says she got the keys to her husband's truck: "You're everything I ever thought you were darlin'. I mean that"


my 2 cents.



I am me, you are you. http://www.imdb.com/mymovies/list?l=42036194

reply

_________________________________________________________________________
Two lines that made me cringe (should have been cut):

"Here's a doobie for the walk."

and

[paraphrasing)

the protagonist to her friend after she says she got the keys to her husband's truck: "You're everything I ever thought you were darlin'. I mean that"

___________________________________________________________________________


I agree with the first line, it really wasn't necessary

but

I liked the 2nd line, it showed that her friend wasn't going to just accept a "No" answer from her husband and Ree knew that her friend at one time would not have accepted to just be the dutiful wife and accept anything her husband said.

reply

I think it was among the best movies I saw last year

reply

...the best American movie of the year.

Go watch the commercial multi-plex fodder you're capable of understanding and don't troll here.

reply

besides the great acting, writing, scenery, plot, and acting.....i agree this movie was boring

reply

Hey Rackon...chill the *beep* out. People are voicing their opinions. That's what these message boards exist for. So if you don't like a film that someone else likes, and you voice that opinion, I guess that makes you a troll too then, right? No. It makes you opinionated. Jesus.
I personally found this feature tremendously dull. It wasn't terrible, but it took me two viewings to finish it (the first time I fell asleep, and I NEVER pass out while watching movies). I didn't find that it had much going for it outside of the intended atmosphere, and that wasn't enough for me. I'd rather just go back and watch "127 Hours," "Blue Valentine," or yes even the commercially successful mult-plex fodder that I suppose was and is "Inception."

reply

It's too bad people can't back up their statements when they dislike a film. Besides "it was boring" and "it sucked" usually they don't tell reasons on why they thought it was boring or what contributed to its suckage. If these boards are meant to be used to voice opinions, then it should at least contain dialogue that moves the discussion forward.

reply

[deleted]

BUT for those that find it boring, perhaps they should have included:

4 wheelers roaring through the forest while the riders were firing at each other with their firearms; Pickup trucks chasing and crashing into each other with one blowing up and bodies flying out before they wrecked; show an actual meth lab blowing up and burning/killing people with screams; a extremely loud soundtrack excluding the type of music shown in the film which was lifelike. This WASN'T an action adventure film, thank goodness


How come when you say a film like this is boring as all hell, someone assumes your tastes are suited for Hollywood explosions and stupidity?

Why can't it just be this film is literally "unbearably" boring because the characters are just uninteresting and bland?

Exciting and intriguing films/characters usually try to keep the moviegoer awake...news flash...

reply

Because most people in real life aren't "exciting and intriguing."

The characters in Winter's Bone are real. The situation, however, is intriguing. That's what makes this film so great.

Winter's Bone: Best film of 2010. Jennifer Lawrence is the next big thing.

reply

Just because a film is realistic doesn't make it compelling. I live half an hour outside of St. Louis, Missouri in Wentzville and can confirm that people do live like this, most notably in the southern portions of the state. So what?
There are far better character study films, and far superior mystery dramas as well.
I mean one half of this entire flick is the lead character walking. Brilliant.

reply

Who said this was a character study? Winter's Bone was a plot-driven script (adaptation), if I've ever seen one. The story unfolds at a perfect pace.

The film is as close to real as you can get. Most "superior" mystery dramas are Hollywood-ized with caricaturized players and over-the-top turns. I loved the fact that Winter's Bone doesn't spoon feed you its cultural mores, blood-ties and themes of reputation. Little details like her using the neighbor's wood chopper, only after "it was offered" (consistent script writing that's easily missed and under-appreciated).

If all you got out of WB was Ree walking around, you missed out on quite a bit. You think a small film like this can be boring if it's nominated for both Golden Globes and Oscars (never mind how much the Oscars have lost their luster)? Look at the BP category this year: Inception, Social Network, King's Speech, 127 Hours, The Kids Are All Right, Black Swan, True Grit. Huge names behind all of them: Sorkin, Fincher, Nolan, DiCapprio, Benning, Boyle, Coens, Firth, etc.

And then you have Winter's Bone.

Winter's Bone: Best film of 2010. Jennifer Lawrence is the next big thing.

reply

I love it when people use the Golden Globes and the Oscars as some sort of anchor to prove that a film is great, when it truth, it doesn't mean $hit. *cough* "Titanic" "The English Patient" "Crash" *cough*
You liked it, I didn't. That doesn't make you smart, and it doesn't make me stupid.
However, to say this wasn't at all a character study is a bit off, I believe. You had a plot that is in NO way one of a kind, driven by the CHARACTERS in the created world and their reactions to one another.
I can appreciate slow films that set up one goal for the protagonist to achieve, and then subsequently have them reach that through the help or hindrance (thus showing their unflinching determination) of others, but this one didn't do it for me. I found it dull. That's my opinion, and it doesn't make me wrong.

reply

Everything else aside, I never called you stupid or wrong. If you interpreted my responses as such, that's a hangup you should work out before joining a forum.

Winter's Bone: Best film of 2010. Jennifer Lawrence is the next big thing.

reply

Actually those noms do mean something when its deserved. I bet if one of your favorite movies was nominated you would be wanking how legit it was since it was nominated and/or won.

reply

I saw it last night. I thought the acting was good, but the story/script was *beep* All she did was walk the whole movie and knock on a few doors.

reply

[deleted]

[deleted]


Saying people really live like this is a valid point. This isn't a documentary. There's nothing wrong with critiquing the story and pace of the film. It doesn't mean it's a bad film. Boring doesn't have to mean "bad". Come on, just think outside of the box and respect peoples' opinions.

reply