Calling Mia crazy or evil does NOT prove Allen Innocent!

>As even some pro-Farrow/anti-Allen critics point out, this one undermines Dylan's experience by using the worst techniques of the genre.

That's interesting. Do you really think people who are psychologically "wedged" in the pro-Farrow/anti-Allen position would care about subtle techniques of the genre. I mean, I can see it. I agree with you, but it's funny as I watch it I feel I know better but that many will be even more convinced by the histrionics in this fake-u-mentary. Careful, you might get me to build up some hope for the American people.

I will say I do not believe the Farrow's charges against Woody with respect to Dylan.
I think Dylan is a very disturbed person who has a lot of rage towards Woody, and
anger at her mother that Mia's authoritarian domination will not allow to come out
or be acknowledged or discussed. Somehow Mia knows how to direct this and project
it out into the public as this charge against Woody.

But, on the other hand who knows what Woody's really personal like is like. After all
in his 40's he had secret trysts with two very young girls, that may have been sexual
for their legal ages of consent. One stated in an interview that Woody introduced Mia
to her as his girlfriend, and that they had threesomes. She said that this was part of
her life and she would not change a thing.

My point is that we cannot know or judge the character of Woody Allen because there
is very little data, but the data that is out there tends to point to him doing whatever
he wants with whomever he wants and getting his way because of his charm and power.
But this is life, and it is not a crime, and even if it was it is a very small crime, that is
not child molestation, not nearly close to it.

She definitely turned all the children against Woody

According to copies of the COURT DOCUMENTS, which can be found at the link below, it was WOODY (NOT Mia) who turns the KIDS AGAINST each other and it also makes it CLEAR that MIA didn't COACH DYLAN:

https://moviechat.org/tt13990468/Allen-v-Farrow/603e603e9185a41a2ca872a9/Heres-The-1993-Woody-Allen-Custody-Ruling-In-Its-Damning-Detailed-Entirety

the ruling by Justice Elliott Wilk paints a particularly damning portrayal of Allen the father, describing him as “self-absorbed, untrustworthy and insensitive,” and undercuts the claims that Farrow was “brainwashed” by her mother into inventing the tale of her sexual molestation.


3. Mia Farrow was “not faultless as a parent,” but, “ironically,” her “principal shortcoming with respect to responsible parenting appears to have been her continued relationship with Mr. Allen.”

2014-02-07-mianotfaultless.png

4. Allen’s “self-absorption” and “lack of judgment and his commitment to the continuation of his divisive assault...warrant a careful monitoring of his future contact with the children.”

Mr. Allen's response to Dylan's claim of sexual abuse was an attack upon Ms. Farrow,
whose parenting ability and emotional stability he impugned without the support of any
significant credible evidence.

His trial strategy has been to separate his children from
their brothers and sisters; to turn the children against their mother; to divide adopted
children from biological children; to incite the family against their household help; and to
set household employees against each other.

His SELF-ABSORPTION, his LACK of JUDGEMENT, and his commitment to the continuation of his divisive assault, thereby impeding the healing of the injuries that he has already caused, warrant a careful monitoring of his future contact with the children.


2014-02-07-selfabsorption.png