MovieChat Forums > Orphan (2009) Discussion > Would You Let Your 10 Year Old Daughter ...

Would You Let Your 10 Year Old Daughter Play Esther?


I just saw this film last night, I enjoyed it throughly. However I felt that it was a quite shocking to see such a young girl be so muderous and provocative. My question for you all is if your daughter was offered the part of Eshter, would you let her? I know its acting but I don't think I would let my daughter do such risque and violent scenes. I feel that children these days grow up so fast being exposed to such sexual and violent matters and I would try to shield them from it as much as I could until they are able to handle it. Discuss.

reply

I agree with you I wouldn't let my ten year old daughter play this part, they probably shouldhave used an older actress for it and made her look younger which with the special effects they have these days is entirely possible.
Oh and just as a side note regarding Isabelle's age she was actually 12 when the film was released so I assume she may have been 11 going on 12 when she made it but thats still to young for this part in my eyes.

"I'll set my course by you my northern star"

reply

[deleted]

Yup, she's a well-balanced and happy-as-a-clam young girl. Her parents are vigilant, and don't even let her see R-films :P

reply

[deleted]

No absolutely not cookie crumb. When people act, they become and they have to completely believe they are that character and see things from their perspective. It can be quite hard to shake off. A 10 or 12 year old are too innocent for this sort of role and the complex and dark issues. I wouldn't want my child playing a psychopath. I wouldn't mind at 16 or 17 though.

reply

Hard to shake off, lol. You apparently haven't seen her.

reply

Isn't she a crackhead now?

"IMdB; where 14 year olds can act like jaded 40 year old critics...'

reply

Obviously she doesn't.

reply

[deleted]

This is not true and I'm guessing you don't have personal experience with acting. Some actors are character actors and choose to stay in role through the duration of filming, but most actors do not do that. Movie/television acting requires much less time in character than being in plays because as previously mentioned, many segments are filmed for just a few minutes and pieced together at the end. Sometimes an actor might only deliver one line and then filming is cut. There are many breaks in between.

Also, many middle school-aged kids aren't as innocent as you would think. I remember closely following the OJ trial when I was in middle school. I loved horror movies and had seen several by that age. You are not destroying a child's innocence at that age. They have slowly been learning about the ways of the world at that point.

~The internet? Is that thing still around?~

reply

I would if they wanted to sign up for the part. Isabelle Fuhrman did a truly terrifying job as Esther, but she's as nice a person as you'd ever meet in real life. Although she can scare the sh*t out of you with one good glare.

reply

This would depend on my child's comprehension of the world around her. Does she know the difference between reality and acting as many people simply do not. There is a difference and some can handle it and some cannot.

This is not real but can my child tell the difference. That is the question. Also does she want to play the part? If yes then I would support her dreams. Not try and protect her from what I perceive as a threat.

reply

[deleted]

Good for you ^.^

reply

[deleted]

Well, maybe. If she really, really, wanted it, than yes. But if it was " I guess" than no.

reply

The part where she comes on to the dad made me consider that a pre-adolescent girl was necking a 30+ man on film; acting or not, it's disturbing.

reply

Her character was 9 but in real life she was 11 when it was filmed. By that age she would know the "facts of life" and the actors were not really nude/humping when this was filmed (it's not a porno)... if Isabelle was even really in the room at that point. And wearing the black dress or getting changed like in a locker room shot from a distance and not much detail was seen aren't really all that much. Filmmakers are generally very careful about that kind of stuff.

As for the violence, that would have also been toned down. Isabelle obviously didn't actually kill anyone. It was just shot to make it look like she did. We do haunted house stuff with fake blood every year for Halloween. She probably had fun pretending to be a serial killer.

BOT- Would I let my daughter play Esther? It depends on the kid. Every child is different and develops at different rates. Some kids would be really afraid any kind of scary thing and no way would they want fake blood. My sister Emily is Isabelle's age and I don't think she would do a role like this even at her current age of 15. My sister Jessica has always loved all kinds of scary movies even when she was a little girl and nothing bothered her (she loves making haunted houses), so if she was interested in doing a movie at 11 I don't think it would be that big of a deal.

I don't know how Isabelle managed to do a film like this when I heard she doesn't like scary movies, but her acting was great and they probably added a lot of stuff in later.

reply

Because when you're part of it, you constantly see the people who get "killed" in the film and the fake blood. WATCHING a film you're not a part of, though, it all looks real and terrifying.

reply

I don't think I would want my child to play a psycho killer. It's hard to tell, though, because so many horror films have behind the scenes interviews where directors state that scenes are manipulated in such a way that child actors don't see what we see on screen. They compile footage and add sound and CGI effects afterwards, so a child might just see a dummy lying on the floor with maybe a little red paint, or maybe they are in front of a green screen and then the scary background is added in later. Filming such scenes probably isn't too scary for children. I doubt that the parents of children who act in scary movies allow their kids to watch the final film.

I definitely wouldn't want my child acting in a sexual scene, such as depicted in Orphan. Esther was really trying to interact in an inappropriate way and you can't CGI that. Plus, even if they could CGI such a scene, I would be concerned that creeps would think of my child in an inappropriate way.

My child is only in 2nd grade. Perhaps Isabelle was more mature. She was eleven years old, right? She may have been better mentally prepared for bloody scenes and cursing.

reply

It was awful cute, but Isabelle was actually really scared/nervous about swearing, so the director lessened the amount of takes for that scene; in fact, up until the end, she kept saying "fudge". She was brought up properly :)

reply

Wow, I've sparked a big discussion here! After reading all the responses, I now think that I would let my daughter play Esther if she had a clear understanding of real and make believe and if she really wanted to the do the role. Based on how the story is written, the only possible way to execute (pardon the pun) the role is to have a child play Esther. Isabelle Fuhrman based on the interview that I've seen of her is a bright, happy kid. She obviously wasn't scared for life. It was a dirty job, but somebody had to do it!

reply

Like others it would have to depend on the child. I think that by age 10, children should have begun learning about the world around them. I know that some would argue that maybe I grew up too fast, but by 10 I had a very clear understanding of the world, and 7 years later my world view has changed very little. Its unfair to shelter a child from the world as they begin to grow up, otherwise they will never understand issues such as abuse, war, the dangers around them, etc. I know 17 year olds that were so sheltered that they didn't know what the holocaust was, did know what molestation meant, and I had a friend who thought the film Titanic was made up and whose parents edited out all the violence from Saving Private Ryan.

I think we underestimate children. Parents have no idea what their child is actually like when they aren't around. I know when I was 10 at home, I was the perfect son, I never did anything wrong. But at school, I swore atrociously, knew all about sex and could put together some quite witty innuendos and pretty much anyone over the age of 9 was the same as me. Granted, I grew up in the UK, so maybe its different in other parts of the world, but I think kids nowadays just grow up fast whether you like it or not. We have so much access to things such as the internet, it doesn't take two seconds to sneakily check something out.

All these people saying that it would corrupt a childs innocence obviously didn't grow up in the early 2000's. A role like this would be difficult, but I think if my child was prepared to take on the role then I would support them, but only if they understood the issues being handled.

I like pigs. Dogs look up to you, cats down on you. Pigs treat you as equals.

reply