Like others it would have to depend on the child. I think that by age 10, children should have begun learning about the world around them. I know that some would argue that maybe I grew up too fast, but by 10 I had a very clear understanding of the world, and 7 years later my world view has changed very little. Its unfair to shelter a child from the world as they begin to grow up, otherwise they will never understand issues such as abuse, war, the dangers around them, etc. I know 17 year olds that were so sheltered that they didn't know what the holocaust was, did know what molestation meant, and I had a friend who thought the film Titanic was made up and whose parents edited out all the violence from Saving Private Ryan.
I think we underestimate children. Parents have no idea what their child is actually like when they aren't around. I know when I was 10 at home, I was the perfect son, I never did anything wrong. But at school, I swore atrociously, knew all about sex and could put together some quite witty innuendos and pretty much anyone over the age of 9 was the same as me. Granted, I grew up in the UK, so maybe its different in other parts of the world, but I think kids nowadays just grow up fast whether you like it or not. We have so much access to things such as the internet, it doesn't take two seconds to sneakily check something out.
All these people saying that it would corrupt a childs innocence obviously didn't grow up in the early 2000's. A role like this would be difficult, but I think if my child was prepared to take on the role then I would support them, but only if they understood the issues being handled.
I like pigs. Dogs look up to you, cats down on you. Pigs treat you as equals.
reply
share