The age could have been any unnatural age they wanted. 180 OR 118 could be considered eye rolling ages, but either helps reinforce that it is a coming of age moment. In the movie she mentions "I'm not 83 anymore." If in their world 118 is considered 18 and vampires age at a proportional rate to humans until adulthood, then 83 would be around 12.5 years old which would be close to the 13 I think DisturbedPixie was referencing.
Now I agree that the music doesn't really fit with the feel of the monsters who are out of touch with the modern world or the mostly laid back backpacker (Jonathan). Also there shouldn't have been technology to synthesize their voices at the hotel, and Dracula most likely wasn't a rapper when he sang in the late 1800s which is supposedly when he last sang before he started busting out at the end.
The end human town was more than a bit too friendly and surreal, and there could have been a more romantic name for the moment when monsters meet their soul mates. I also thought the plot could have been more streamlined to spend more time developing the relationships between Dracula, Mavis, and Jonathan and less time with simple jokes, showing how uncool things are, and Quasimodo.
I did enjoy the half of the movie that did develop the characters. I particularly enjoyed the start when Dracula was raising Mavis, Mavis showing up in the graveyard with Jonathan and sharing the sunrise with him on the roof, the table moving 'game' Dracula and Jonathan share, and the discussions Dracula has with Mavis and soon after with Jonathan that involve his late wife (though the former is unfortunately interspersed with Quasimodo). The reveal that had to happen near the end could have just as easily been accidental without Quasimodo too, but I digress.
As with any post about likes and dislikes, they are just my opinion of the film. I can't say it is my favorite, but for the parts I liked, I'm glad I got to experience those endearing moments.
reply
share