Just AWFUL


This movie was painful to watch from beginning to lame, predictable end. Not even a quarter of the way through, and I was already hoping for the main character to "off" himself. That would've been a small, glimmering light cast upon this completely in-the-dark movie. Instead, I will just have to settle for Robert Downey Jr.'s performance.

This movie was completely pointless and contrived. Think "Ferris Bueller's Day Off", then detach all realism and common sense and you will have "Charlie Bartlett". It would be a run-of-the-mill teen movie if not for the total lack of a story, enormous plotholes, and the ridiculously incomprehensible devotion to the main character as the focus.

Anton Yelchin shows absolutely no range as an actor in this movie. He expresses sadness by giving us a kind of "puppy-dog" look and slumping his head over and happiness by over-the-top smiling. His voice is like that of a pre-pubescent boy and is basically a monotone throughout the movie. They were likely trying to emphasize his calm, cool, and collected nature but instead it ended up seeming very unnatural and forced. On top of that, the character had no depth whatsoever, but that is no fault of the actor.

So, Charlie gets kicked out of private school and enlisted into a vastly different public school resulting in the "fish-out-of-water". Charlie is sent to a shrink for his misdeeds, and is prescribed with Ritalin. He gets high and decides to peddle it at school. Here's the funny part: he becomes an overnight sensation because of it. Every student gets high off of Ritalin at a school dance and mayhem ensues. All of a sudden, all of the kids at school want to see him because he's the guy that's got the goods. Charlie manages to somehow not be discovered by the principal (Downey Jr.) and continues to peddle meds to way too many kids out of the school bathroom for two weeks or so. When he is finally discovered to have been nearly liable for the death of a fellow student (unsuccessful suicide attempt) he is suspended for a whole three days. No jail time necessary, not even an expulsion. In the end, the problem and solution to everybody's problem is within Charlie Bartlett. I'm going to cut this short because I'm not looking to do a monologue.

2/10

reply

I loved this movie so much! I'm a sucker for the predictable teen movies. They are just so entertaining. Some of the parts in the film were cringe-worthing because of the bad acting, I will admit that. But I do think Anton Yelchin is a pretty good actor. He's done better films, but he was, at times, really funny in this movie. It's an enjoyable film if you don't take it too seriously.

reply

i thought the film along with yelchin and downey jr's performances was good. some of you people need to lighten up, the fact that you come on here and pour out essays is just frightening. if you didnt like a movie once..dont watch it again? i dont know..try that out.

reply

[deleted]

Awful. Waste of my life

reply

> When he is finally discovered to have been nearly liable for the death of a fellow student (unsuccessful suicide attempt) he is suspended for a whole three days. No jail time necessary, not even an expulsion.

Keep in mind that the principal said, "Now, if we could prove any of this it would be a completely different story." He was suspended for three days because he was selling the DVDs. That's all they could hang on him, although they deeply suspected him of selling drugs too.

--
What Would Jesus Do For A Klondike Bar (WWJDFAKB)?

reply

you're opinion is awful...


just AWFUL!!!

reply

I'm not going to go into a essay about how everyone else is a moron or whatever, but I do want to clarify some plot points. (And these are just my interpretations of the movie).

- Charlie became popular not just by distributing drugs, but by giving kids a kick ass dance where they could get high and have a lot of fun. He wasn't cheered for down the hallway for being a drug dealer-- it was the experience that they all got from him and his Ritalin. He later became even more popular for being a good listener and really helping the kids who wouldn't get help anywhere else. He really listened to the other students and didn't just classify them as overdramatic teenagers as many adults would. He was there for them as a good leader and a good friend, though his popularity did become his downfall later in the movie.
- Charlie doesn't just punch Robert Downing Jr.'s character just for asking to know what's in the bag. He punches him because he grabs Charlie's girlfriend's arm and jerks her away, probably causing some pain for her. He was just defending his girlfriend, even if it was from her own father.
- High schools across the country are different. I agree that the bully character was very much too extreme (along with the swirlies), but many of the other stereotypes still do exist, but many simply don't notice them. I know at my school, there are punk rockers, theatre kids, preps/ cheerleaders, the isolated, depressed kids people probably should pay more attention to, and so on. It may seem exaggerated to some people, but when you think about it, they didn't extinguish stereotypes very clearly anyway. The only characters very stereotypical, in my opinion, were the bully and the cheerleader who slept with everyone on the football team. Everyone else was just simply... there. They had their style and that's about all.
- Charlie always did have good intentions, but his quest for popularity did get in the way, as displayed by the drug dealing. But his good heart is shown when he still gives advice free of charge and flushes all of the meds away so they can't hurt anyone else.

I personally love this movie, and I'm sorry not everyone could enjoy it as much as I did. I really do think it's witty and has some elements of truth in it (but not everything). If all movies were exactly as real life is, then it wouldn't nearly be as interesting, anyway.

Does anyone have any other opinions as to who could have played the role of Charlie better than Anton?

reply

Yes....

Charlie would have been better by:

Kid from 'I am David'
Kid from 'Hallam Foe'
Kid (Russian) from 'Running Scared'
The young Kulkin from 'Dangerous Lives of Altar Boys'

...in my humble opinion.

I did not love Charlie Bartlett. It had a feel of spoiled, upper-class, whiny, indecisive, blah. My mind is still not totally made up. I am still digesting it. I only saw it because we were doing "a day at the movies."

reply

*beep* this movie

reply

Anton Yelchin shows absolutely no range as an actor in this movie. He expresses sadness by giving us a kind of "puppy-dog" look and slumping his head over and happiness by over-the-top smiling. His voice is like that of a pre-pubescent boy and is basically a monotone throughout the movie. They were likely trying to emphasize his calm, cool, and collected nature but instead it ended up seeming very unnatural and forced.


Agreed. This is the first lead role I've seen him in and I gotta ask: "Why all the hype?!"






Do you like having sex? Then DON'T buy a Nintendo!

reply

[deleted]

You're one of those people who like to suck the fun out of everything, aren't you?

reply

[deleted]